Theorem sylnibr 296

Description: A mixed syllogism inference from an implication and a biconditional. Useful for substituting a consequent with a definition. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 16-Dec-2013.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
sylnibr.1	|- (ph -> -. ps)
sylnibr.2	|- (ch <-> ps)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
sylnibr	|- (ph -> -. ch)

Proof of Theorem sylnibr

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		sylnibr.1	. 2 |- (ph -> -. ps)
2		sylnibr.2	. . 3 |- (ch <-> ps)
3	2	bicomi 193	. 2 |- (ps <-> ch)
4	1, 3	sylnib 295	1 |- (ph -> -. ch)

Syntax hints:  -. wn 3   -> wi 4   <-> wb 176

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-3 7  ax-mp 8

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 177

This theorem is referenced by:  ncfinraise  4481  tfinltfin  4501  sfindbl  4530  tfinnn  4534  vfinncvntsp  4549  nnc3n3p1  6278  nnc3n3p2  6279  nnc3p1n3p2  6280  nchoicelem2  6290