Theorem invffval 17011

Description: Value of the inverse relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
invfval.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)
invfval.n	⊢ 𝑁 = (Inv‘𝐶)
invfval.c	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
invfval.x	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)
invfval.y	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)
invfval.s	⊢ 𝑆 = (Sect‘𝐶)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
invffval	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ((𝑥𝑆𝑦) ∩ ◡(𝑦𝑆𝑥))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐵   𝜑,𝑥,𝑦   𝑥,𝑋,𝑦   𝑥,𝑌,𝑦   𝑥,𝐶,𝑦   𝑥,𝑆,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑁(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem invffval

Dummy variable 𝑐 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		invfval.n	. 2 ⊢ 𝑁 = (Inv‘𝐶)
2		invfval.c	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
3		fveq2 6656	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝐶 → (Base‘𝑐) = (Base‘𝐶))
4		invfval.b	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)
5	3, 4	syl6eqr 2874	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝐶 → (Base‘𝑐) = 𝐵)
6		fveq2 6656	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝐶 → (Sect‘𝑐) = (Sect‘𝐶))
7		invfval.s	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑆 = (Sect‘𝐶)
8	6, 7	syl6eqr 2874	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝐶 → (Sect‘𝑐) = 𝑆)
9	8	oveqd 7159	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝐶 → (𝑥(Sect‘𝑐)𝑦) = (𝑥𝑆𝑦))
10	8	oveqd 7159	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝐶 → (𝑦(Sect‘𝑐)𝑥) = (𝑦𝑆𝑥))
11	10	cnveqd 5732	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝐶 → ◡(𝑦(Sect‘𝑐)𝑥) = ◡(𝑦𝑆𝑥))
12	9, 11	ineq12d 4178	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝐶 → ((𝑥(Sect‘𝑐)𝑦) ∩ ◡(𝑦(Sect‘𝑐)𝑥)) = ((𝑥𝑆𝑦) ∩ ◡(𝑦𝑆𝑥)))
13	5, 5, 12	mpoeq123dv 7215	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝐶 → (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑐), 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑐) ↦ ((𝑥(Sect‘𝑐)𝑦) ∩ ◡(𝑦(Sect‘𝑐)𝑥))) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ((𝑥𝑆𝑦) ∩ ◡(𝑦𝑆𝑥))))
14		df-inv 17001	. . . 4 ⊢ Inv = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑐), 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑐) ↦ ((𝑥(Sect‘𝑐)𝑦) ∩ ◡(𝑦(Sect‘𝑐)𝑥))))
15	4	fvexi 6670	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V
16	15, 15	mpoex 7763	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ((𝑥𝑆𝑦) ∩ ◡(𝑦𝑆𝑥))) ∈ V
17	13, 14, 16	fvmpt 6754	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → (Inv‘𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ((𝑥𝑆𝑦) ∩ ◡(𝑦𝑆𝑥))))
18	2, 17	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Inv‘𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ((𝑥𝑆𝑦) ∩ ◡(𝑦𝑆𝑥))))
19	1, 18	syl5eq 2868	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ((𝑥𝑆𝑦) ∩ ◡(𝑦𝑆𝑥))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2114   ∩ cin 3923  ^◡ccnv 5540  ‘cfv 6341  (class class class)co 7142   ∈ cmpo 7144  Basecbs 16466  Catccat 16918  Sectcsect 16997  Invcinv 16998

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2793  ax-rep 5176  ax-sep 5189  ax-nul 5196  ax-pow 5252  ax-pr 5316  ax-un 7447

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2622  df-eu 2654  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-nfc 2963  df-ne 3017  df-ral 3143  df-rex 3144  df-reu 3145  df-rab 3147  df-v 3488  df-sbc 3764  df-csb 3872  df-dif 3927  df-un 3929  df-in 3931  df-ss 3940  df-nul 4280  df-if 4454  df-pw 4527  df-sn 4554  df-pr 4556  df-op 4560  df-uni 4825  df-iun 4907  df-br 5053  df-opab 5115  df-mpt 5133  df-id 5446  df-xp 5547  df-rel 5548  df-cnv 5549  df-co 5550  df-dm 5551  df-rn 5552  df-res 5553  df-ima 5554  df-iota 6300  df-fun 6343  df-fn 6344  df-f 6345  df-f1 6346  df-fo 6347  df-f1o 6348  df-fv 6349  df-ov 7145  df-oprab 7146  df-mpo 7147  df-1st 7675  df-2nd 7676  df-inv 17001

This theorem is referenced by:  invfval  17012  isoval  17018