Theorem iscgrgd 26299

Description: The property for two sequences 𝐴 and 𝐵 of points to be congruent. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 3-Apr-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
iscgrg.p	⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
iscgrg.m	⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)
iscgrg.e	⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺)
iscgrgd.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)
iscgrgd.d	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ⊆ ℝ)
iscgrgd.a	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴:𝐷⟶𝑃)
iscgrgd.b	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵:𝐷⟶𝑃)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
iscgrgd	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∼ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐴∀𝑗 ∈ dom 𝐴((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑗)) = ((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑗))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑖,𝑗,𝐺   𝐴,𝑖,𝑗   𝐵,𝑖,𝑗

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑖,𝑗)   𝐷(𝑖,𝑗)   𝑃(𝑖,𝑗)   ∼ (𝑖,𝑗)   − (𝑖,𝑗)   𝑉(𝑖,𝑗)

Proof of Theorem iscgrgd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		iscgrgd.a	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴:𝐷⟶𝑃)
2		iscgrgd.d	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ⊆ ℝ)
3		iscgrg.p	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
4	3	fvexi 6684	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑃 ∈ V
5		reex 10628	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ℝ ∈ V
6		elpm2r 8424	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑃 ∈ V ∧ ℝ ∈ V) ∧ (𝐴:𝐷⟶𝑃 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ ℝ)) → 𝐴 ∈ (𝑃 ↑pm ℝ))
7	4, 5, 6	mpanl12 700	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴:𝐷⟶𝑃 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ ℝ) → 𝐴 ∈ (𝑃 ↑pm ℝ))
8	1, 2, 7	syl2anc 586	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝑃 ↑pm ℝ))
9		iscgrgd.b	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵:𝐷⟶𝑃)
10		elpm2r 8424	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝑃 ∈ V ∧ ℝ ∈ V) ∧ (𝐵:𝐷⟶𝑃 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ ℝ)) → 𝐵 ∈ (𝑃 ↑pm ℝ))
11	4, 5, 10	mpanl12 700	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐵:𝐷⟶𝑃 ∧ 𝐷 ⊆ ℝ) → 𝐵 ∈ (𝑃 ↑pm ℝ))
12	9, 2, 11	syl2anc 586	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝑃 ↑pm ℝ))
13	8, 12	jca 514	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ (𝑃 ↑pm ℝ) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝑃 ↑pm ℝ)))
14	13	biantrurd 535	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((dom 𝐴 = dom 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐴∀𝑗 ∈ dom 𝐴((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑗)) = ((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑗))) ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝑃 ↑pm ℝ) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝑃 ↑pm ℝ)) ∧ (dom 𝐴 = dom 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐴∀𝑗 ∈ dom 𝐴((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑗)) = ((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑗))))))
15	1	fdmd 6523	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝐴 = 𝐷)
16	9	fdmd 6523	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝐵 = 𝐷)
17	15, 16	eqtr4d 2859	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝐴 = dom 𝐵)
18	17	biantrurd 535	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐴∀𝑗 ∈ dom 𝐴((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑗)) = ((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑗)) ↔ (dom 𝐴 = dom 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐴∀𝑗 ∈ dom 𝐴((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑗)) = ((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑗)))))
19		iscgrgd.g	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)
20		iscgrg.m	. . . 4 ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)
21		iscgrg.e	. . . 4 ⊢ ∼ = (cgrG‘𝐺)
22	3, 20, 21	iscgrg 26298	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∼ 𝐵 ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝑃 ↑pm ℝ) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝑃 ↑pm ℝ)) ∧ (dom 𝐴 = dom 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐴∀𝑗 ∈ dom 𝐴((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑗)) = ((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑗))))))
23	19, 22	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∼ 𝐵 ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝑃 ↑pm ℝ) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝑃 ↑pm ℝ)) ∧ (dom 𝐴 = dom 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐴∀𝑗 ∈ dom 𝐴((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑗)) = ((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑗))))))
24	14, 18, 23	3bitr4rd 314	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∼ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑖 ∈ dom 𝐴∀𝑗 ∈ dom 𝐴((𝐴‘𝑖) − (𝐴‘𝑗)) = ((𝐵‘𝑖) − (𝐵‘𝑗))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2114  ∀wral 3138  Vcvv 3494   ⊆ wss 3936   class class class wbr 5066  dom cdm 5555  ⟶wf 6351  ‘cfv 6355  (class class class)co 7156   ↑_pm cpm 8407  ℝcr 10536  Basecbs 16483  distcds 16574  cgrGccgrg 26296

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2793  ax-sep 5203  ax-nul 5210  ax-pow 5266  ax-pr 5330  ax-un 7461  ax-cnex 10593  ax-resscn 10594

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2622  df-eu 2654  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-nfc 2963  df-ne 3017  df-ral 3143  df-rex 3144  df-rab 3147  df-v 3496  df-sbc 3773  df-dif 3939  df-un 3941  df-in 3943  df-ss 3952  df-nul 4292  df-if 4468  df-pw 4541  df-sn 4568  df-pr 4570  df-op 4574  df-uni 4839  df-br 5067  df-opab 5129  df-mpt 5147  df-id 5460  df-xp 5561  df-rel 5562  df-cnv 5563  df-co 5564  df-dm 5565  df-rn 5566  df-iota 6314  df-fun 6357  df-fn 6358  df-f 6359  df-fv 6363  df-ov 7159  df-oprab 7160  df-mpo 7161  df-pm 8409  df-cgrg 26297

This theorem is referenced by:  iscgrglt  26300  trgcgrg  26301  motcgrg  26330