Theorem rspcedv 3608

Description: Restricted existential specialization, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by FL, 17-Apr-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
rspcdv.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
rspcdv.2	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
rspcedv	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵   𝜑,𝑥   𝜒,𝑥

Allowed substitution hint:   𝜓(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem rspcedv

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		rspcdv.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
2		rspcdv.2	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
3	2	biimprd 250	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐴) → (𝜒 → 𝜓))
4	1, 3	rspcimedv 3606	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2114  ∃wrex 3139

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-ext 2793

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-ex 1781  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-ral 3143  df-rex 3144

This theorem is referenced by:  rspcebdv  3609  rspcev  3615  rspcedvd  3618  0csh0  14140  gcdcllem1  15831  nn0gsumfz  19087  pmatcollpw3lem  21374  pmatcollpw3fi1lem2  21378  pm2mpfo  21405  f1otrg  26643  cusgrfilem2  27224  wwlksnredwwlkn  27659  wwlksnextprop  27676  clwwlknun  27875  cusconngr  27954  xrofsup  30478  esum2d  31359  rexzrexnn0  39493  ov2ssiunov2  40135  requad2  43873  lcoel0  44568  lcoss  44576  el0ldep  44606  ldepspr  44613  islindeps2  44623  isldepslvec2  44625  affinecomb1  44774