Theorem ceqsal 2649

Description: A representation of explicit substitution of a class for a variable, inferred from an implicit substitution hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ceqsal.1	|- F/ x ps
ceqsal.2	|- A e. _V
ceqsal.3	|- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ceqsal	|- ( A. x ( x = A -> ph ) <-> ps )

Distinct variable group:   x, A

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x)   ps( x)

Proof of Theorem ceqsal

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ceqsal.2	. 2 |- A e. _V
2		ceqsal.1	. . 3 |- F/ x ps
3		ceqsal.3	. . 3 |- ( x = A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
4	2, 3	ceqsalg 2648	. 2 |- ( A e. _V -> ( A. x ( x = A -> ph ) <-> ps ) )
5	1, 4	ax-mp 7	1 |- ( A. x ( x = A -> ph ) <-> ps )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   <-> wb 104   A.wal 1288   = wceq 1290   F/wnf 1395   e. wcel 1439   _Vcvv 2620

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-5 1382  ax-gen 1384  ax-ie1 1428  ax-ie2 1429  ax-8 1441  ax-4 1446  ax-17 1465  ax-i9 1469  ax-ial 1473  ax-ext 2071

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1396  df-sb 1694  df-clab 2076  df-cleq 2082  df-clel 2085  df-v 2622

This theorem is referenced by:  ceqsalv  2650