P. 28 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 2701-2800   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	r19.35-1 2701	Restricted quantifier version of 19.35-1 1677. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Jun-2018.)
|- ( E. x e. A ( ph -> ps ) -> ( A. x e. A ph -> E. x e. A ps ) )
Theorem	r19.36av 2702*	One direction of a restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.36 of [Margaris] p. 90. In classical logic, the converse would hold if A has at least one element, but in intuitionistic logic, that is not a sufficient condition. (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2003.)
|- ( E. x e. A ( ph -> ps ) -> ( A. x e. A ph -> ps ) )
Theorem	r19.37 2703	Restricted version of one direction of Theorem 19.37 of [Margaris] p. 90. In classical logic the converse would hold if A has at least one element, but that is not sufficient in intuitionistic logic. (Contributed by FL, 13-May-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Dec-2016.)
|- F/ x ph   =>    |- ( E. x e. A ( ph -> ps ) -> ( ph -> E. x e. A ps ) )
Theorem	r19.37av 2704*	Restricted version of one direction of Theorem 19.37 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2004.)
|- ( E. x e. A ( ph -> ps ) -> ( ph -> E. x e. A ps ) )
Theorem	r19.40 2705	Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.40 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2004.)
|- ( E. x e. A ( ph /\ ps ) -> ( E. x e. A ph /\ E. x e. A ps ) )
Theorem	r19.41 2706	Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.41 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2010.)
|- F/ x ps   =>    |- ( E. x e. A ( ph /\ ps ) <-> ( E. x e. A ph /\ ps ) )
Theorem	r19.41v 2707*	Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.41 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2003.)
|- ( E. x e. A ( ph /\ ps ) <-> ( E. x e. A ph /\ ps ) )
Theorem	r19.42v 2708*	Restricted version of Theorem 19.42 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.)
|- ( E. x e. A ( ph /\ ps ) <-> ( ph /\ E. x e. A ps ) )
Theorem	r19.43 2709	Restricted version of Theorem 19.43 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 5-Jun-2018.)
|- ( E. x e. A ( ph \/ ps ) <-> ( E. x e. A ph \/ E. x e. A ps ) )
Theorem	r19.44av 2710*	One direction of a restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.44 of [Margaris] p. 90. The other direction doesn't hold when A is empty. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2004.)
|- ( E. x e. A ( ph \/ ps ) -> ( E. x e. A ph \/ ps ) )
Theorem	r19.45av 2711*	Restricted version of one direction of Theorem 19.45 of [Margaris] p. 90. (The other direction doesn't hold when A is empty.) (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2004.)
|- ( E. x e. A ( ph \/ ps ) -> ( ph \/ E. x e. A ps ) )
Theorem	ralcomf 2712*	Commutation of restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ y A   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B ph <-> A. y e. B A. x e. A ph )
Theorem	rexcomf 2713*	Commutation of restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ y A   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- ( E. x e. A E. y e. B ph <-> E. y e. B E. x e. A ph )
Theorem	ralcom 2714*	Commutation of restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B ph <-> A. y e. B A. x e. A ph )
Theorem	rexcom 2715*	Commutation of restricted quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 14-Oct-2016.)
|- ( E. x e. A E. y e. B ph <-> E. y e. B E. x e. A ph )
Theorem	ralrot3 2716*	Rotate three restricted universal quantifiers. (Contributed by AV, 3-Dec-2021.)
|- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B A. z e. C ph <-> A. z e. C A. x e. A A. y e. B ph )
Theorem	rexcom13 2717*	Swap 1st and 3rd restricted existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2015.)
|- ( E. x e. A E. y e. B E. z e. C ph <-> E. z e. C E. y e. B E. x e. A ph )
Theorem	rexrot4 2718*	Rotate existential restricted quantifiers twice. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2015.)
|- ( E. x e. A E. y e. B E. z e. C E. w e. D ph <-> E. z e. C E. w e. D E. x e. A E. y e. B ph )
Theorem	ralcom3 2719	A commutative law for restricted quantifiers that swaps the domain of the restriction. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2004.)
|- ( A. x e. A ( x e. B -> ph ) <-> A. x e. B ( x e. A -> ph ) )
Theorem	reean 2720*	Rearrange existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 27-Oct-2010.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   =>    |- ( E. x e. A E. y e. B ( ph /\ ps ) <-> ( E. x e. A ph /\ E. y e. B ps ) )
Theorem	reeanv 2721*	Rearrange existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-1999.)
|- ( E. x e. A E. y e. B ( ph /\ ps ) <-> ( E. x e. A ph /\ E. y e. B ps ) )
Theorem	3reeanv 2722*	Rearrange three existential quantifiers. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 11-Jun-2010.)
|- ( E. x e. A E. y e. B E. z e. C ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) <-> ( E. x e. A ph /\ E. y e. B ps /\ E. z e. C ch ) )
Theorem	nfreu1 2723	x is not free in E! x e. A ph. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1997.)
|- F/ x E! x e. A ph
Theorem	nfrmo1 2724	x is not free in E* x e. A ph. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
|- F/ x E* x e. A ph
Theorem	nfreudxy 2725*	Not-free deduction for restricted uniqueness. This is a version where x and y are distinct. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Jun-2018.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- ( ph -> F/_ x A )   &    |- ( ph -> F/ x ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> F/ x E! y e. A ps )
Theorem	nfreuw 2726*	Not-free for restricted uniqueness. This is a version where x and y are distinct. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Jun-2018.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/ x ph   =>    |- F/ x E! y e. A ph
Theorem	rabid 2727	An "identity" law of concretion for restricted abstraction. Special case of Definition 2.1 of [Quine] p. 16. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.)
|- ( x e. { x e. A | ph } <-> ( x e. A /\ ph ) )
Theorem	reqabi 2728	Inference from equality of a class variable and a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 16-Feb-2004.)
|- A = { x e. B | ph }   =>    |- ( x e. A <-> ( x e. B /\ ph ) )
Theorem	rabid2 2729*	An "identity" law for restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.)
|- ( A = { x e. A | ph } <-> A. x e. A ph )
Theorem	rabbi 2730	Equivalent wff's correspond to equal restricted class abstractions. Closed theorem form of rabbidva 2809. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2013.)
|- ( A. x e. A ( ps <-> ch ) <-> { x e. A | ps } = { x e. A | ch } )
Theorem	rabswap 2731	Swap with a membership relation in a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-2005.)
|- { x e. A | x e. B } = { x e. B | x e. A }
Theorem	nfrab1 2732	The abstraction variable in a restricted class abstraction isn't free. (Contributed by NM, 19-Mar-1997.)
|- F/_ x { x e. A | ph }
Theorem	nfrabw 2733*	A variable not free in a wff remains so in a restricted class abstraction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Jul-2018.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- F/_ x A   =>    |- F/_ x { y e. A | ph }
Theorem	reubida 2734	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Nov-2016.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E! x e. A ps <-> E! x e. A ch ) )
Theorem	cbvrmow 2735*	Change the bound variable of a restricted at-most-one quantifier using implicit substitution. Version of cbvrmo 2785 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.) (Revised by GG, 23-May-2024.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E* x e. A ph <-> E* y e. A ps )
Theorem	reubidva 2736*	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-2004.)
|- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E! x e. A ps <-> E! x e. A ch ) )
Theorem	reubidv 2737*	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-1996.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E! x e. A ps <-> E! x e. A ch ) )
Theorem	reubiia 2738	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2004.)
|- ( x e. A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E! x e. A ph <-> E! x e. A ps )
Theorem	reubii 2739	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-1999.)
|- ( ph <-> ps )   =>    |- ( E! x e. A ph <-> E! x e. A ps )
Theorem	rmobida 2740	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E* x e. A ps <-> E* x e. A ch ) )
Theorem	rmobidva 2741*	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
|- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E* x e. A ps <-> E* x e. A ch ) )
Theorem	rmobidv 2742*	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E* x e. A ps <-> E* x e. A ch ) )
Theorem	rmobiia 2743	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
|- ( x e. A -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E* x e. A ph <-> E* x e. A ps )
Theorem	rmobii 2744	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier (inference form). (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
|- ( ph <-> ps )   =>    |- ( E* x e. A ph <-> E* x e. A ps )
Theorem	raleqf 2745	Equality theorem for restricted universal quantifier, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2004.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- ( A = B -> ( A. x e. A ph <-> A. x e. B ph ) )
Theorem	rexeqf 2746	Equality theorem for restricted existential quantifier, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- ( A = B -> ( E. x e. A ph <-> E. x e. B ph ) )
Theorem	reueq1f 2747	Equality theorem for restricted unique existential quantifier, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Andrew Salmon, 11-Jul-2011.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- ( A = B -> ( E! x e. A ph <-> E! x e. B ph ) )
Theorem	rmoeq1f 2748	Equality theorem for restricted at-most-one quantifier, with bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable restrictions. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- ( A = B -> ( E* x e. A ph <-> E* x e. B ph ) )
Theorem	raleq 2749*	Equality theorem for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-1995.)
|- ( A = B -> ( A. x e. A ph <-> A. x e. B ph ) )
Theorem	rexeq 2750*	Equality theorem for restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-1995.)
|- ( A = B -> ( E. x e. A ph <-> E. x e. B ph ) )
Theorem	reueq1 2751*	Equality theorem for restricted unique existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.)
|- ( A = B -> ( E! x e. A ph <-> E! x e. B ph ) )
Theorem	rmoeq1 2752*	Equality theorem for restricted at-most-one quantifier. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.)
|- ( A = B -> ( E* x e. A ph <-> E* x e. B ph ) )
Theorem	raleqi 2753*	Equality inference for restricted universal qualifier. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 22-Jun-2011.)
|- A = B   =>    |- ( A. x e. A ph <-> A. x e. B ph )
Theorem	rexeqi 2754*	Equality inference for restricted existential qualifier. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2015.)
|- A = B   =>    |- ( E. x e. A ph <-> E. x e. B ph )
Theorem	raleqdv 2755*	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-2005.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x e. A ps <-> A. x e. B ps ) )
Theorem	rexeqdv 2756*	Equality deduction for restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2007.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x e. A ps <-> E. x e. B ps ) )
Theorem	raleqtrdv 2757*	Substitution of equal classes into a restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by Matthew House, 21-Jul-2025.)
|- ( ph -> A. x e. A ps )   &    |- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> A. x e. B ps )
Theorem	rexeqtrdv 2758*	Substitution of equal classes into a restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by Matthew House, 21-Jul-2025.)
|- ( ph -> E. x e. A ps )   &    |- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. x e. B ps )
Theorem	raleqtrrdv 2759*	Substitution of equal classes into a restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by Matthew House, 21-Jul-2025.)
|- ( ph -> A. x e. A ps )   &    |- ( ph -> B = A )   =>    |- ( ph -> A. x e. B ps )
Theorem	rexeqtrrdv 2760*	Substitution of equal classes into a restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by Matthew House, 21-Jul-2025.)
|- ( ph -> E. x e. A ps )   &    |- ( ph -> B = A )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. x e. B ps )
Theorem	raleqbi1dv 2761*	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-1995.)
|- ( A = B -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A = B -> ( A. x e. A ph <-> A. x e. B ps ) )
Theorem	rexeqbi1dv 2762*	Equality deduction for restricted existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-1997.)
|- ( A = B -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A = B -> ( E. x e. A ph <-> E. x e. B ps ) )
Theorem	reueqd 2763*	Equality deduction for restricted unique existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.)
|- ( A = B -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A = B -> ( E! x e. A ph <-> E! x e. B ps ) )
Theorem	rmoeqd 2764*	Equality deduction for restricted at-most-one quantifier. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.)
|- ( A = B -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A = B -> ( E* x e. A ph <-> E* x e. B ps ) )
Theorem	raleqbidv 2765*	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2007.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x e. A ps <-> A. x e. B ch ) )
Theorem	rexeqbidv 2766*	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2007.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x e. A ps <-> E. x e. B ch ) )
Theorem	raleqbidva 2767*	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x e. A ps <-> A. x e. B ch ) )
Theorem	rexeqbidva 2768*	Equality deduction for restricted universal quantifier. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x e. A ps <-> E. x e. B ch ) )
Theorem	mormo 2769	Unrestricted "at most one" implies restricted "at most one". (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
|- ( E* x ph -> E* x e. A ph )
Theorem	reu5 2770	Restricted uniqueness in terms of "at most one". (Contributed by NM, 23-May-1999.) (Revised by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
|- ( E! x e. A ph <-> ( E. x e. A ph /\ E* x e. A ph ) )
Theorem	reurex 2771	Restricted unique existence implies restricted existence. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-1999.)
|- ( E! x e. A ph -> E. x e. A ph )
Theorem	reurmo 2772	Restricted existential uniqueness implies restricted "at most one." (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
|- ( E! x e. A ph -> E* x e. A ph )
Theorem	rmo5 2773	Restricted "at most one" in term of uniqueness. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
|- ( E* x e. A ph <-> ( E. x e. A ph -> E! x e. A ph ) )
Theorem	nrexrmo 2774	Nonexistence implies restricted "at most one". (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-2017.)
|- ( -. E. x e. A ph -> E* x e. A ph )
Theorem	cbvralfw 2775*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvralf 2777 with a disjoint variable condition. Although we don't do so yet, we expect this disjoint variable condition will allow us to remove reliance on ax-i12 1560 and ax-bndl 1562 in the proof. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2004.) (Revised by GG, 23-May-2024.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ y A   &    |- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A ph <-> A. y e. A ps )
Theorem	cbvrexfw 2776*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvrexf 2778 with a disjoint variable condition. Although we don't do so yet, we expect this disjoint variable condition will allow us to remove reliance on ax-i12 1560 and ax-bndl 1562 in the proof. (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.) (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ y A   &    |- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. A ph <-> E. y e. A ps )
Theorem	cbvralf 2777	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Oct-2016.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ y A   &    |- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A ph <-> A. y e. A ps )
Theorem	cbvrexf 2778	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by FL, 27-Apr-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 9-Oct-2016.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jun-2018.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ y A   &    |- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. A ph <-> E. y e. A ps )
Theorem	cbvralw 2779*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvral 2782 with a disjoint variable condition. Although we don't do so yet, we expect this disjoint variable condition will allow us to remove reliance on ax-i12 1560 and ax-bndl 1562 in the proof. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2003.) (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A ph <-> A. y e. A ps )
Theorem	cbvrexw 2780*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvrexfw 2776 with more disjoint variable conditions. Although we don't do so yet, we expect the disjoint variable conditions will allow us to remove reliance on ax-i12 1560 and ax-bndl 1562 in the proof. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2003.) (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. A ph <-> E. y e. A ps )
Theorem	cbvreuw 2781*	Change the bound variable of a restricted unique existential quantifier using implicit substitution. Version of cbvreu 2784 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.) (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 10-Dec-2024.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E! x e. A ph <-> E! y e. A ps )
Theorem	cbvral 2782*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2003.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A ph <-> A. y e. A ps )
Theorem	cbvrex 2783*	Rule used to change bound variables, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-2003.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 8-Jun-2011.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. A ph <-> E. y e. A ps )
Theorem	cbvreu 2784*	Change the bound variable of a restricted unique existential quantifier using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E! x e. A ph <-> E! y e. A ps )
Theorem	cbvrmo 2785*	Change the bound variable of restricted "at most one" using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2017.)
|- F/ y ph   &    |- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E* x e. A ph <-> E* y e. A ps )
Theorem	cbvralv 2786*	Change the bound variable of a restricted universal quantifier using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-1997.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A ph <-> A. y e. A ps )
Theorem	cbvrexv 2787*	Change the bound variable of a restricted existential quantifier using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-1998.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. A ph <-> E. y e. A ps )
Theorem	cbvreuv 2788*	Change the bound variable of a restricted unique existential quantifier using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Oct-2016.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E! x e. A ph <-> E! y e. A ps )
Theorem	cbvrmov 2789*	Change the bound variable of a restricted at-most-one quantifier using implicit substitution. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 17-Jun-2017.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E* x e. A ph <-> E* y e. A ps )
Theorem	cbvralvw 2790*	Version of cbvralv 2786 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by GG, 10-Jan-2024.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by GG, 25-Aug-2024.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A ph <-> A. y e. A ps )
Theorem	cbvrexvw 2791*	Version of cbvrexv 2787 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by GG, 10-Jan-2024.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by GG, 25-Aug-2024.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. A ph <-> E. y e. A ps )
Theorem	cbvreuvw 2792*	Version of cbvreuv 2788 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by GG, 10-Jan-2024.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by GG, 25-Aug-2024.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E! x e. A ph <-> E! y e. A ps )
Theorem	cbvraldva2 2793*	Rule used to change the bound variable in a restricted universal quantifier with implicit substitution which also changes the quantifier domain. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( ( ph /\ x = y ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x = y ) -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x e. A ps <-> A. y e. B ch ) )
Theorem	cbvrexdva2 2794*	Rule used to change the bound variable in a restricted existential quantifier with implicit substitution which also changes the quantifier domain. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( ( ph /\ x = y ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x = y ) -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x e. A ps <-> E. y e. B ch ) )
Theorem	cbvraldva 2795*	Rule used to change the bound variable in a restricted universal quantifier with implicit substitution. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( ( ph /\ x = y ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x e. A ps <-> A. y e. A ch ) )
Theorem	cbvrexdva 2796*	Rule used to change the bound variable in a restricted existential quantifier with implicit substitution. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|- ( ( ph /\ x = y ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x e. A ps <-> E. y e. A ch ) )
Theorem	cbvral2vw 2797*	Change bound variables of double restricted universal quantification, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvral2v 2799 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2211. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2004.) (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)
|- ( x = z -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( y = w -> ( ch <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B ph <-> A. z e. A A. w e. B ps )
Theorem	cbvrex2vw 2798*	Change bound variables of double restricted universal quantification, using implicit substitution. Version of cbvrex2v 2800 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2211. (Contributed by FL, 2-Jul-2012.) (Revised by GG, 10-Jan-2024.)
|- ( x = z -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( y = w -> ( ch <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. A E. y e. B ph <-> E. z e. A E. w e. B ps )
Theorem	cbvral2v 2799*	Change bound variables of double restricted universal quantification, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2004.)
|- ( x = z -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( y = w -> ( ch <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x e. A A. y e. B ph <-> A. z e. A A. w e. B ps )
Theorem	cbvrex2v 2800*	Change bound variables of double restricted universal quantification, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by FL, 2-Jul-2012.)
|- ( x = z -> ( ph <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( y = w -> ( ch <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( E. x e. A E. y e. B ph <-> E. z e. A E. w e. B ps )