| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > exalim | GIF version | ||
| Description: One direction of a classical definition of existential quantification. One direction of Definition of [Margaris] p. 49. For a decidable proposition, this is an equivalence, as seen as dfexdc 1515. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jul-2018.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| exalim | ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 → ¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | alnex 1513 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥𝜑) | |
| 2 | 1 | biimpi 120 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ∃𝑥𝜑) |
| 3 | 2 | con2i 628 | 1 ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 → ¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑) |
| Colors of variables: wff set class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ∀wal 1362 ∃wex 1506 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-ia1 106 ax-ia2 107 ax-ia3 108 ax-in1 615 ax-in2 616 ax-5 1461 ax-gen 1463 ax-ie2 1508 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 117 df-tru 1367 df-fal 1370 |
| This theorem is referenced by: n0rf 3463 ax9vsep 4156 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |