![]() |
Intuitionistic Logic Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > ILE Home > Th. List > exalim | GIF version |
Description: One direction of a classical definition of existential quantification. One direction of Definition of [Margaris] p. 49. For a decidable proposition, this is an equivalence, as seen as dfexdc 1442. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Jul-2018.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
exalim | ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 → ¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | alnex 1440 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥𝜑) | |
2 | 1 | biimpi 119 | . 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ∃𝑥𝜑) |
3 | 2 | con2i 595 | 1 ⊢ (∃𝑥𝜑 → ¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ 𝜑) |
Colors of variables: wff set class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ∀wal 1294 ∃wex 1433 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-1 5 ax-2 6 ax-mp 7 ax-ia1 105 ax-ia2 106 ax-ia3 107 ax-in1 582 ax-in2 583 ax-5 1388 ax-gen 1390 ax-ie2 1435 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 116 df-tru 1299 df-fal 1302 |
This theorem is referenced by: n0rf 3314 ax9vsep 3983 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |