Theorem bj-mpgs 36567

Description: From a closed form theorem (the major premise) with an antecedent in the "strong necessity" modality (in the language of modal logic), deduce the inference ⊢ 𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ 𝜓. Strong necessity is stronger than necessity, and equivalent to it when sp 2184 (modal T) is available. Therefore, this theorem is stronger than mpg 1795 when sp 2184 is not available. (Contributed by BJ, 1-Nov-2023.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bj-mpgs.min	⊢ 𝜑
bj-mpgs.maj	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥𝜑) → 𝜓)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-mpgs	⊢ 𝜓

Proof of Theorem bj-mpgs

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bj-mpgs.min	. 2 ⊢ 𝜑
2	1	ax-gen 1793	. 2 ⊢ ∀𝑥𝜑
3		bj-mpgs.maj	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥𝜑) → 𝜓)
4	1, 2, 3	mp2an 691	1 ⊢ 𝜓

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1535

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-nnfbii  36685  bj-nnfth  36700