Theorem bj-mpgs 35943

Description: From a closed form theorem (the major premise) with an antecedent in the "strong necessity" modality (in the language of modal logic), deduce the inference ⊢ 𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ 𝜓. Strong necessity is stronger than necessity, and equivalent to it when sp 2168 (modal T) is available. Therefore, this theorem is stronger than mpg 1791 when sp 2168 is not available. (Contributed by BJ, 1-Nov-2023.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bj-mpgs.min	⊢ 𝜑
bj-mpgs.maj	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥𝜑) → 𝜓)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-mpgs	⊢ 𝜓

Proof of Theorem bj-mpgs

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bj-mpgs.min	. 2 ⊢ 𝜑
2	1	ax-gen 1789	. 2 ⊢ ∀𝑥𝜑
3		bj-mpgs.maj	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥𝜑) → 𝜓)
4	1, 2, 3	mp2an 689	1 ⊢ 𝜓

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1531

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1789

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-nnfbii  36061  bj-nnfth  36076