Theorem bj-mpgs 35953

Description: From a closed form theorem (the major premise) with an antecedent in the "strong necessity" modality (in the language of modal logic), deduce the inference ⊢ 𝜑 ⇒ ⊢ 𝜓. Strong necessity is stronger than necessity, and equivalent to it when sp 2175 (modal T) is available. Therefore, this theorem is stronger than mpg 1798 when sp 2175 is not available. (Contributed by BJ, 1-Nov-2023.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bj-mpgs.min	⊢ 𝜑
bj-mpgs.maj	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥𝜑) → 𝜓)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-mpgs	⊢ 𝜓

Proof of Theorem bj-mpgs

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bj-mpgs.min	. 2 ⊢ 𝜑
2	1	ax-gen 1796	. 2 ⊢ ∀𝑥𝜑
3		bj-mpgs.maj	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥𝜑) → 𝜓)
4	1, 2, 3	mp2an 689	1 ⊢ 𝜓

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1538

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-nnfbii  36071  bj-nnfth  36086