| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 360 of 506) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31248) |
(31249-32771) |
(32772-50582) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | prv1n 35901 | No wff encoded as a Godel-set of membership is true in a model with only one element. (Contributed by AV, 19-Nov-2023.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ω ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → ¬ {𝑋}⊧(𝐼∈𝑔𝐽)) | ||
| Syntax | cgon 35902 | The Godel-set of negation. (Note that this is not a wff.) |
| class ¬𝑔𝑈 | ||
| Syntax | cgoa 35903 | The Godel-set of conjunction. |
| class ∧𝑔 | ||
| Syntax | cgoi 35904 | The Godel-set of implication. |
| class →𝑔 | ||
| Syntax | cgoo 35905 | The Godel-set of disjunction. |
| class ∨𝑔 | ||
| Syntax | cgob 35906 | The Godel-set of equivalence. |
| class ↔𝑔 | ||
| Syntax | cgoq 35907 | The Godel-set of equality. |
| class =𝑔 | ||
| Syntax | cgox 35908 | The Godel-set of existential quantification. (Note that this is not a wff.) |
| class ∃𝑔𝑁𝑈 | ||
| Definition | df-gonot 35909 | Define the Godel-set of negation. Here the argument 𝑈 is also a Godel-set corresponding to smaller formulas. Note that this is a class expression, not a wff. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ ¬𝑔𝑈 = (𝑈⊼𝑔𝑈) | ||
| Definition | df-goan 35910* | Define the Godel-set of conjunction. Here the arguments 𝑈 and 𝑉 are also Godel-sets corresponding to smaller formulas. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ ∧𝑔 = (𝑢 ∈ V, 𝑣 ∈ V ↦ ¬𝑔(𝑢⊼𝑔𝑣)) | ||
| Definition | df-goim 35911* | Define the Godel-set of implication. Here the arguments 𝑈 and 𝑉 are also Godel-sets corresponding to smaller formulas. Note that this is a class expression, not a wff. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ →𝑔 = (𝑢 ∈ V, 𝑣 ∈ V ↦ (𝑢⊼𝑔¬𝑔𝑣)) | ||
| Definition | df-goor 35912* | Define the Godel-set of disjunction. Here the arguments 𝑈 and 𝑉 are also Godel-sets corresponding to smaller formulas. Note that this is a class expression, not a wff. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ ∨𝑔 = (𝑢 ∈ V, 𝑣 ∈ V ↦ (¬𝑔𝑢 →𝑔 𝑣)) | ||
| Definition | df-gobi 35913* | Define the Godel-set of equivalence. Here the arguments 𝑈 and 𝑉 are also Godel-sets corresponding to smaller formulas. Note that this is a class expression, not a wff. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ ↔𝑔 = (𝑢 ∈ V, 𝑣 ∈ V ↦ ((𝑢 →𝑔 𝑣)∧𝑔(𝑣 →𝑔 𝑢))) | ||
| Definition | df-goeq 35914* | Define the Godel-set of equality. Here the arguments 𝑥 = 〈𝑁, 𝑃〉 correspond to vN and vP , so (∅=𝑔1o) actually means v0 = v1 , not 0 = 1. Here we use the trick mentioned in ax-ext 2735 to introduce equality as a defined notion in terms of ∈𝑔. The expression suc (𝑢 ∪ 𝑣) = max (𝑢, 𝑣) + 1 here is a convenient way of getting a dummy variable distinct from 𝑢 and 𝑣. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ =𝑔 = (𝑢 ∈ ω, 𝑣 ∈ ω ↦ ⦋suc (𝑢 ∪ 𝑣) / 𝑤⦌∀𝑔𝑤((𝑤∈𝑔𝑢) ↔𝑔 (𝑤∈𝑔𝑣))) | ||
| Definition | df-goex 35915 | Define the Godel-set of existential quantification. Here 𝑁 ∈ ω corresponds to vN , and 𝑈 represents another formula, and this expression is [∃𝑥𝜑] = ∃𝑔𝑁𝑈 where 𝑥 is the 𝑁-th variable, 𝑈 = [𝜑] is the code for 𝜑. Note that this is a class expression, not a wff. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ ∃𝑔𝑁𝑈 = ¬𝑔∀𝑔𝑁¬𝑔𝑈 | ||
| Syntax | cgze 35916 | The Axiom of Extensionality. |
| class AxExt | ||
| Syntax | cgzr 35917 | The Axiom Scheme of Replacement. |
| class AxRep | ||
| Syntax | cgzp 35918 | The Axiom of Power Sets. |
| class AxPow | ||
| Syntax | cgzu 35919 | The Axiom of Unions. |
| class AxUn | ||
| Syntax | cgzg 35920 | The Axiom of Regularity. |
| class AxReg | ||
| Syntax | cgzi 35921 | The Axiom of Infinity. |
| class AxInf | ||
| Syntax | cgzf 35922 | The set of models of ZF. |
| class ZF | ||
| Definition | df-gzext 35923 | The Godel-set version of the Axiom of Extensionality. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ AxExt = (∀𝑔2o((2o∈𝑔∅) ↔𝑔 (2o∈𝑔1o)) →𝑔 (∅=𝑔1o)) | ||
| Definition | df-gzrep 35924 | The Godel-set version of the Axiom Scheme of Replacement. Since this is a scheme and not a single axiom, it manifests as a function on wffs, each giving rise to a different axiom. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ AxRep = (𝑢 ∈ (Fmla‘ω) ↦ (∀𝑔3o∃𝑔1o∀𝑔2o(∀𝑔1o𝑢 →𝑔 (2o=𝑔1o)) →𝑔 ∀𝑔1o∀𝑔2o((2o∈𝑔1o) ↔𝑔 ∃𝑔3o((3o∈𝑔∅)∧𝑔∀𝑔1o𝑢)))) | ||
| Definition | df-gzpow 35925 | The Godel-set version of the Axiom of Power Sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ AxPow = ∃𝑔1o∀𝑔2o(∀𝑔1o((1o∈𝑔2o) ↔𝑔 (1o∈𝑔∅)) →𝑔 (2o∈𝑔1o)) | ||
| Definition | df-gzun 35926 | The Godel-set version of the Axiom of Unions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ AxUn = ∃𝑔1o∀𝑔2o(∃𝑔1o((2o∈𝑔1o)∧𝑔(1o∈𝑔∅)) →𝑔 (2o∈𝑔1o)) | ||
| Definition | df-gzreg 35927 | The Godel-set version of the Axiom of Regularity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ AxReg = (∃𝑔1o(1o∈𝑔∅) →𝑔 ∃𝑔1o((1o∈𝑔∅)∧𝑔∀𝑔2o((2o∈𝑔1o) →𝑔 ¬𝑔(2o∈𝑔∅)))) | ||
| Definition | df-gzinf 35928 | The Godel-set version of the Axiom of Infinity. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ AxInf = ∃𝑔1o((∅∈𝑔1o)∧𝑔∀𝑔2o((2o∈𝑔1o) →𝑔 ∃𝑔∅((2o∈𝑔∅)∧𝑔(∅∈𝑔1o)))) | ||
| Definition | df-gzf 35929* | Define the class of all (transitive) models of ZF. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2013.) |
| ⊢ ZF = {𝑚 ∣ ((Tr 𝑚 ∧ 𝑚⊧AxExt ∧ 𝑚⊧AxPow) ∧ (𝑚⊧AxUn ∧ 𝑚⊧AxReg ∧ 𝑚⊧AxInf) ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ (Fmla‘ω)𝑚⊧(AxRep‘𝑢))} | ||
This is a formalization of Appendix C of the Metamath book, which describes the mathematical representation of a formal system, of which set.mm (this file) is one. | ||
| Syntax | cmcn 35930 | The set of constants. |
| class mCN | ||
| Syntax | cmvar 35931 | The set of variables. |
| class mVR | ||
| Syntax | cmty 35932 | The type function. |
| class mType | ||
| Syntax | cmvt 35933 | The set of variable typecodes. |
| class mVT | ||
| Syntax | cmtc 35934 | The set of typecodes. |
| class mTC | ||
| Syntax | cmax 35935 | The set of axioms. |
| class mAx | ||
| Syntax | cmrex 35936 | The set of raw expressions. |
| class mREx | ||
| Syntax | cmex 35937 | The set of expressions. |
| class mEx | ||
| Syntax | cmdv 35938 | The set of distinct variables. |
| class mDV | ||
| Syntax | cmvrs 35939 | The variables in an expression. |
| class mVars | ||
| Syntax | cmrsub 35940 | The set of raw substitutions. |
| class mRSubst | ||
| Syntax | cmsub 35941 | The set of substitutions. |
| class mSubst | ||
| Syntax | cmvh 35942 | The set of variable hypotheses. |
| class mVH | ||
| Syntax | cmpst 35943 | The set of pre-statements. |
| class mPreSt | ||
| Syntax | cmsr 35944 | The reduct of a pre-statement. |
| class mStRed | ||
| Syntax | cmsta 35945 | The set of statements. |
| class mStat | ||
| Syntax | cmfs 35946 | The set of formal systems. |
| class mFS | ||
| Syntax | cmcls 35947 | The closure of a set of statements. |
| class mCls | ||
| Syntax | cmpps 35948 | The set of provable pre-statements. |
| class mPPSt | ||
| Syntax | cmthm 35949 | The set of theorems. |
| class mThm | ||
| Definition | df-mcn 35950 | Define the set of constants in a Metamath formal system. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mCN = Slot 1 | ||
| Definition | df-mvar 35951 | Define the set of variables in a Metamath formal system. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mVR = Slot 2 | ||
| Definition | df-mty 35952 | Define the type function in a Metamath formal system. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mType = Slot 3 | ||
| Definition | df-mtc 35953 | Define the set of typecodes in a Metamath formal system. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mTC = Slot 4 | ||
| Definition | df-mmax 35954 | Define the set of axioms in a Metamath formal system. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mAx = Slot 5 | ||
| Definition | df-mvt 35955 | Define the set of variable typecodes in a Metamath formal system. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mVT = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ ran (mType‘𝑡)) | ||
| Definition | df-mrex 35956 | Define the set of "raw expressions", which are expressions without a typecode attached. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mREx = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ Word ((mCN‘𝑡) ∪ (mVR‘𝑡))) | ||
| Definition | df-mex 35957 | Define the set of expressions, which are strings of constants and variables headed by a typecode constant. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mEx = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ ((mTC‘𝑡) × (mREx‘𝑡))) | ||
| Definition | df-mdv 35958 | Define the set of distinct variable conditions, which are pairs of distinct variables. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mDV = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (((mVR‘𝑡) × (mVR‘𝑡)) ∖ I )) | ||
| Definition | df-mvrs 35959* | Define the set of variables in an expression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mVars = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (𝑒 ∈ (mEx‘𝑡) ↦ (ran (2nd ‘𝑒) ∩ (mVR‘𝑡)))) | ||
| Definition | df-mrsub 35960* | Define a substitution of raw expressions given a mapping from variables to expressions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mRSubst = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∈ ((mREx‘𝑡) ↑pm (mVR‘𝑡)) ↦ (𝑒 ∈ (mREx‘𝑡) ↦ ((freeMnd‘((mCN‘𝑡) ∪ (mVR‘𝑡))) Σg ((𝑣 ∈ ((mCN‘𝑡) ∪ (mVR‘𝑡)) ↦ if(𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑓, (𝑓‘𝑣), 〈“𝑣”〉)) ∘ 𝑒))))) | ||
| Definition | df-msub 35961* | Define a substitution of expressions given a mapping from variables to expressions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mSubst = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∈ ((mREx‘𝑡) ↑pm (mVR‘𝑡)) ↦ (𝑒 ∈ (mEx‘𝑡) ↦ 〈(1st ‘𝑒), (((mRSubst‘𝑡)‘𝑓)‘(2nd ‘𝑒))〉))) | ||
| Definition | df-mvh 35962* | Define the mapping from variables to their variable hypothesis. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mVH = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (𝑣 ∈ (mVR‘𝑡) ↦ 〈((mType‘𝑡)‘𝑣), 〈“𝑣”〉〉)) | ||
| Definition | df-mpst 35963* | Define the set of all pre-statements. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mPreSt = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (({𝑑 ∈ 𝒫 (mDV‘𝑡) ∣ ◡𝑑 = 𝑑} × (𝒫 (mEx‘𝑡) ∩ Fin)) × (mEx‘𝑡))) | ||
| Definition | df-msr 35964* | Define the reduct of a pre-statement. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mStRed = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (𝑠 ∈ (mPreSt‘𝑡) ↦ ⦋(2nd ‘(1st ‘𝑠)) / ℎ⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑠) / 𝑎⦌〈((1st ‘(1st ‘𝑠)) ∩ ⦋∪ ((mVars‘𝑡) “ (ℎ ∪ {𝑎})) / 𝑧⦌(𝑧 × 𝑧)), ℎ, 𝑎〉)) | ||
| Definition | df-msta 35965 | Define the set of all statements. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mStat = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ ran (mStRed‘𝑡)) | ||
| Definition | df-mfs 35966* | Define the set of all formal systems. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mFS = {𝑡 ∣ ((((mCN‘𝑡) ∩ (mVR‘𝑡)) = ∅ ∧ (mType‘𝑡):(mVR‘𝑡)⟶(mTC‘𝑡)) ∧ ((mAx‘𝑡) ⊆ (mStat‘𝑡) ∧ ∀𝑣 ∈ (mVT‘𝑡) ¬ (◡(mType‘𝑡) “ {𝑣}) ∈ Fin))} | ||
| Definition | df-mcls 35967* | Define the closure of a set of statements relative to a set of disjointness constraints. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mCls = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (𝑑 ∈ 𝒫 (mDV‘𝑡), ℎ ∈ 𝒫 (mEx‘𝑡) ↦ ∩ {𝑐 ∣ ((ℎ ∪ ran (mVH‘𝑡)) ⊆ 𝑐 ∧ ∀𝑚∀𝑜∀𝑝(〈𝑚, 𝑜, 𝑝〉 ∈ (mAx‘𝑡) → ∀𝑠 ∈ ran (mSubst‘𝑡)(((𝑠 “ (𝑜 ∪ ran (mVH‘𝑡))) ⊆ 𝑐 ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑚𝑦 → (((mVars‘𝑡)‘(𝑠‘((mVH‘𝑡)‘𝑥))) × ((mVars‘𝑡)‘(𝑠‘((mVH‘𝑡)‘𝑦)))) ⊆ 𝑑)) → (𝑠‘𝑝) ∈ 𝑐)))})) | ||
| Definition | df-mpps 35968* | Define the set of provable pre-statements. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mPPSt = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ {〈〈𝑑, ℎ〉, 𝑎〉 ∣ (〈𝑑, ℎ, 𝑎〉 ∈ (mPreSt‘𝑡) ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (𝑑(mCls‘𝑡)ℎ))}) | ||
| Definition | df-mthm 35969 | Define the set of theorems. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ mThm = (𝑡 ∈ V ↦ (◡(mStRed‘𝑡) “ ((mStRed‘𝑡) “ (mPPSt‘𝑡)))) | ||
| Theorem | mvtval 35970 | The set of variable typecodes. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVT‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (mType‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ 𝑉 = ran 𝑌 | ||
| Theorem | mrexval 35971 | The set of "raw expressions", which are expressions without a typecode, that is, just sequences of constants and variables. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCN‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝑅 = Word (𝐶 ∪ 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mexval 35972 | The set of expressions, which are pairs whose first element is a typecode, and whose second element is a raw expression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = (mTC‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐾 × 𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | mexval2 35973 | The set of expressions, which are pairs whose first element is a typecode, and whose second element is a list of constants and variables. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐾 = (mTC‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCN‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐾 × Word (𝐶 ∪ 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mdvval 35974 | The set of disjoint variable conditions, which are pairs of distinct variables. (This definition differs from appendix C, which uses unordered pairs instead. We use ordered pairs, but all sets of disjoint variable conditions of interest will be symmetric, so it does not matter.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (mDV‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐷 = ((𝑉 × 𝑉) ∖ I ) | ||
| Theorem | mvrsval 35975 | The set of variables in an expression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (mVars‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐸 → (𝑊‘𝑋) = (ran (2nd ‘𝑋) ∩ 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mvrsfpw 35976 | The set of variables in an expression is a finite subset of 𝑉. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑊 = (mVars‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐸 → (𝑊‘𝑋) ∈ (𝒫 𝑉 ∩ Fin)) | ||
| Theorem | mrsubffval 35977* | The substitution of some variables for expressions in a raw expression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCN‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (freeMnd‘(𝐶 ∪ 𝑉)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝑆 = (𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑pm 𝑉) ↦ (𝑒 ∈ 𝑅 ↦ (𝐺 Σg ((𝑣 ∈ (𝐶 ∪ 𝑉) ↦ if(𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑓, (𝑓‘𝑣), 〈“𝑣”〉)) ∘ 𝑒))))) | ||
| Theorem | mrsubfval 35978* | The substitution of some variables for expressions in a raw expression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCN‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (freeMnd‘(𝐶 ∪ 𝑉)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑉) → (𝑆‘𝐹) = (𝑒 ∈ 𝑅 ↦ (𝐺 Σg ((𝑣 ∈ (𝐶 ∪ 𝑉) ↦ if(𝑣 ∈ 𝐴, (𝐹‘𝑣), 〈“𝑣”〉)) ∘ 𝑒)))) | ||
| Theorem | mrsubval 35979* | The substitution of some variables for expressions in a raw expression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCN‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (freeMnd‘(𝐶 ∪ 𝑉)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑅) → ((𝑆‘𝐹)‘𝑋) = (𝐺 Σg ((𝑣 ∈ (𝐶 ∪ 𝑉) ↦ if(𝑣 ∈ 𝐴, (𝐹‘𝑣), 〈“𝑣”〉)) ∘ 𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | mrsubcv 35980 | The value of a substituted singleton. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCN‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝐶 ∪ 𝑉)) → ((𝑆‘𝐹)‘〈“𝑋”〉) = if(𝑋 ∈ 𝐴, (𝐹‘𝑋), 〈“𝑋”〉)) | ||
| Theorem | mrsubvr 35981 | The value of a substituted variable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝑆‘𝐹)‘〈“𝑋”〉) = (𝐹‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | mrsubff 35982 | A substitution is a function from 𝑅 to 𝑅. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝑆:(𝑅 ↑pm 𝑉)⟶(𝑅 ↑m 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | mrsubrn 35983 | Although it is defined for partial mappings of variables, every partial substitution is a substitution on some complete mapping of the variables. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ ran 𝑆 = (𝑆 “ (𝑅 ↑m 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | mrsubff1 35984 | When restricted to complete mappings, the substitution-producing function is one-to-one. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝑆 ↾ (𝑅 ↑m 𝑉)):(𝑅 ↑m 𝑉)–1-1→(𝑅 ↑m 𝑅)) | ||
| Theorem | mrsubff1o 35985 | When restricted to complete mappings, the substitution-producing function is bijective to the set of all substitutions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝑆 ↾ (𝑅 ↑m 𝑉)):(𝑅 ↑m 𝑉)–1-1-onto→ran 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | mrsub0 35986 | The value of the substituted empty string. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ ran 𝑆 → (𝐹‘∅) = ∅) | ||
| Theorem | mrsubf 35987 | A substitution is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ ran 𝑆 → 𝐹:𝑅⟶𝑅) | ||
| Theorem | mrsubccat 35988 | Substitution distributes over concatenation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ ran 𝑆 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑅) → (𝐹‘(𝑋 ++ 𝑌)) = ((𝐹‘𝑋) ++ (𝐹‘𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | mrsubcn 35989 | A substitution does not change the value of constant substrings. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCN‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ ran 𝑆 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝑉)) → (𝐹‘〈“𝑋”〉) = 〈“𝑋”〉) | ||
| Theorem | elmrsubrn 35990* | Characterization of the substitutions as functions from expressions to expressions that distribute under concatenation and map constants to themselves. (The constant part uses (𝐶 ∖ 𝑉) because we don't know that 𝐶 and 𝑉 are disjoint until we get to ismfs 36019.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐶 = (mCN‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝐹 ∈ ran 𝑆 ↔ (𝐹:𝑅⟶𝑅 ∧ ∀𝑐 ∈ (𝐶 ∖ 𝑉)(𝐹‘〈“𝑐”〉) = 〈“𝑐”〉 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑅 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑅 (𝐹‘(𝑥 ++ 𝑦)) = ((𝐹‘𝑥) ++ (𝐹‘𝑦))))) | ||
| Theorem | mrsubco 35991 | The composition of two substitutions is a substitution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ ran 𝑆 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ ran 𝑆) → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ∈ ran 𝑆) | ||
| Theorem | mrsubvrs 35992* | The set of variables in a substitution is the union, indexed by the variables in the original expression, of the variables in the substitution to that variable. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ ran 𝑆 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑅) → (ran (𝐹‘𝑋) ∩ 𝑉) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ (ran 𝑋 ∩ 𝑉)(ran (𝐹‘〈“𝑥”〉) ∩ 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | msubffval 35993* | A substitution applied to an expression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mSubst‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝑆 = (𝑓 ∈ (𝑅 ↑pm 𝑉) ↦ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 ↦ 〈(1st ‘𝑒), ((𝑂‘𝑓)‘(2nd ‘𝑒))〉))) | ||
| Theorem | msubfval 35994* | A substitution applied to an expression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mSubst‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑉) → (𝑆‘𝐹) = (𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 ↦ 〈(1st ‘𝑒), ((𝑂‘𝐹)‘(2nd ‘𝑒))〉)) | ||
| Theorem | msubval 35995 | A substitution applied to an expression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mSubst‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐸) → ((𝑆‘𝐹)‘𝑋) = 〈(1st ‘𝑋), ((𝑂‘𝐹)‘(2nd ‘𝑋))〉) | ||
| Theorem | msubrsub 35996 | A substitution applied to an expression. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mSubst‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐸) → (2nd ‘((𝑆‘𝐹)‘𝑋)) = ((𝑂‘𝐹)‘(2nd ‘𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | msubty 35997 | The type of a substituted expression is the same as the original type. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mSubst‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑅 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐸) → (1st ‘((𝑆‘𝐹)‘𝑋)) = (1st ‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | elmsubrn 35998* | Characterization of substitution in terms of raw substitution, without reference to the generating functions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (mRSubst‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mSubst‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ ran 𝑆 = ran (𝑓 ∈ ran 𝑂 ↦ (𝑒 ∈ 𝐸 ↦ 〈(1st ‘𝑒), (𝑓‘(2nd ‘𝑒))〉)) | ||
| Theorem | msubrn 35999 | Although it is defined for partial mappings of variables, every partial substitution is a substitution on some complete mapping of the variables. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mSubst‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ ran 𝑆 = (𝑆 “ (𝑅 ↑m 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | msubff 36000 | A substitution is a function from 𝐸 to 𝐸. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Jul-2016.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (mVR‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (mREx‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (mSubst‘𝑇) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (mEx‘𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝑆:(𝑅 ↑pm 𝑉)⟶(𝐸 ↑m 𝐸)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |