MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  ecase33d Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem ecase33d 1501
Description: Deduction for elimination by cases. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 5-Jul-2026.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
ecase33d.1 (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)
ecase33d.2 (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜒)
ecase33d.3 (𝜑 → (𝜓𝜒𝜃))
Assertion
Ref Expression
ecase33d (𝜑𝜃)

Proof of Theorem ecase33d
StepHypRef Expression
1 ecase33d.3 . . 3 (𝜑 → (𝜓𝜒𝜃))
2 df-3or 1102 . . 3 ((𝜓𝜒𝜃) ↔ ((𝜓𝜒) ∨ 𝜃))
31, 2sylib 221 . 2 (𝜑 → ((𝜓𝜒) ∨ 𝜃))
4 ecase33d.1 . . 3 (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)
5 ecase33d.2 . . 3 (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜒)
6 ioran 999 . . 3 (¬ (𝜓𝜒) ↔ (¬ 𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜒))
74, 5, 6sylanbrc 594 . 2 (𝜑 → ¬ (𝜓𝜒))
83, 7orcnd 891 1 (𝜑𝜃)
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3  wi 4  wo 860  w3o 1100
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3or 1102
This theorem is referenced by:  nhpmirhp  29034
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator