Theorem equid1 38922

Description: Proof of equid 2012 from our older axioms. This is often an axiom of equality in textbook systems, but we don't need it as an axiom since it can be proved from our other axioms (although the proof, as you can see below, is not as obvious as you might think). This proof uses only axioms without distinct variable conditions and requires no dummy variables. A simpler proof, similar to Tarski's, is possible if we make use of ax-5 1910; see the proof of equid 2012. See equid1ALT 38948 for an alternate proof. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-1993.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
equid1	⊢ 𝑥 = 𝑥

Proof of Theorem equid1

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax-c4 38907	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥(∀𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑥 → (𝑥 = 𝑥 → ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑥)) → (∀𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑥 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑥 → ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑥)))
2		ax-c5 38906	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑥 → ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑥)
3		ax-c9 38913	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑥 → (¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑥 → (𝑥 = 𝑥 → ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑥)))
4	2, 2, 3	sylc 65	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑥 → (𝑥 = 𝑥 → ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑥))
5	1, 4	mpg 1797	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑥 → ∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑥 → ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑥))
6		ax-c10 38909	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑥 → ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑥)
7	5, 6	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑥 → 𝑥 = 𝑥)
8		ax-c7 38908	. 2 ⊢ (¬ ∀𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑥 → 𝑥 = 𝑥)
9	7, 8	pm2.61i 182	1 ⊢ 𝑥 = 𝑥

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4  ∀wal 1538

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-c5 38906  ax-c4 38907  ax-c7 38908  ax-c10 38909  ax-c9 38913

This theorem is referenced by:  equcomi1  38923