Theorem exnalimn 1867

Description: Existential quantification of a conjunction expressed with only primitive symbols (→, ¬, ∀). (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1993.) State the most general instance. (Revised by BJ, 29-Sep-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
exnalimn	⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓))

Proof of Theorem exnalimn

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		alinexa 1866	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
2	1	con2bii 360	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400  ∀wal 1561  ∃wex 1802

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1818  ax-4 1832

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-ex 1803

This theorem is referenced by:  ax12ev2  2218  r2exlem  3154  regsfromsetind  36912  mh-prprimbi  36916  mh-infprim1bi  36919