Theorem r2exlem 3240

Description: Lemma factoring out common proof steps in r2exf 3241 an r2ex 3242. Introduced to reduce dependencies on axioms. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 10-Jan-2020.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
r2exlem.1	⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ 𝜑))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
r2exlem	⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑))

Proof of Theorem r2exlem

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		exnal 1922	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ 𝜑) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ 𝜑))
2		r2exlem.1	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ 𝜑))
3	1, 2	xchbinxr 327	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ 𝜑) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝜑)
4		alinexa 1940	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ 𝜑) ↔ ¬ ∃𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑))
5	4	con2bii 349	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ 𝜑))
6	5	exbii 1944	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥 ¬ ∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ 𝜑))
7		ralnex2 3226	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑)
8	7	con2bii 349	. 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ¬ 𝜑)
9	3, 6, 8	3bitr4ri 296	1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜑))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 198   ∧ wa 385  ∀wal 1651  ∃wex 1875   ∈ wcel 2157  ∀wral 3089  ∃wrex 3090

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1891  ax-4 1905

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 199  df-an 386  df-ex 1876  df-ral 3094  df-rex 3095

This theorem is referenced by:  r2exf  3241  r2ex  3242