![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > iseqsetv-cleq | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Alternate proof of iseqsetv-clel 2823. The expression ∃𝑥𝑥 = 𝐴 does
not depend on a particular choice of the set variable. The proof here
avoids df-clab 2718, df-clel 2819 and ax-8 2110, but instead is based on
ax-9 2118, ax-ext 2711 and df-cleq 2732. In particular it still accepts
𝑥
∈ 𝐴 being a
primitive syntax term, not assuming any specific
semantics (like elementhood in some form).
Use it in contexts where you want to avoid df-clab 2718, or you need df-cleq 2732 anyway. See the alternative version , not using df-cleq 2732 or ax-ext 2711 or ax-9 2118. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 6-Aug-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
iseqsetv-cleq | ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐴) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | iseqsetvlem 2808 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑧 𝑧 = 𝐴) | |
2 | iseqsetvlem 2808 | . 2 ⊢ (∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑧 𝑧 = 𝐴) | |
3 | 1, 2 | bitr4i 278 | 1 ⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑦 = 𝐴) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ↔ wb 206 = wceq 1537 ∃wex 1777 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1793 ax-4 1807 ax-5 1909 ax-6 1967 ax-7 2007 ax-9 2118 ax-ext 2711 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-ex 1778 df-cleq 2732 |
This theorem is referenced by: clelab 2890 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |