Theorem abbi 2828

Description: Equivalent formulas yield equal class abstractions (closed form). This is the backward implication of abbib 2832, proved from fewer axioms, and hence is independently named. (Contributed by BJ and WL and SN, 20-Aug-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
abbi	⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓})

Proof of Theorem abbi

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		spsbbi 2111	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
2		df-clab 2742	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
3		df-clab 2742	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)
4	1, 2, 3	3bitr4g 317	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}))
5	4	eqrdv 2761	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓})

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209  ∀wal 1567   = wceq 1569  [wsb 2100   ∈ wcel 2146  {cab 2741

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1944  ax-6 2001  ax-7 2042  ax-9 2156  ax-ext 2735

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-ex 1812  df-sb 2101  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755

This theorem is used by:  abbidv  2829  abbii  2830  abbid  2831  eqab  2902  sbcbi2  3800  iuneq12df  4981  axrep6g  5246  iotabi  6514  uniabio  6515  iotaval  6519  iotain  6520  iotanul  6526  iuneq12daf  33208  bj-abv  37948  bj-cleq  38005  abbi1sn  43420