Theorem abbi 2826

Description: Equivalent formulas yield equal class abstractions (closed form). This is the backward implication of abbib 2830, proved from fewer axioms, and hence is independently named. (Contributed by BJ and WL and SN, 20-Aug-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
abbi	⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓})

Proof of Theorem abbi

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		spsbbi 2105	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
2		df-clab 2740	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
3		df-clab 2740	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)
4	1, 2, 3	3bitr4g 316	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}))
5	4	eqrdv 2759	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208  ∀wal 1557   = wceq 1559  [wsb 2089   ∈ wcel 2141  {cab 2739

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1814  ax-4 1828  ax-5 1929  ax-6 1986  ax-7 2027  ax-9 2151  ax-ext 2733

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-ex 1799  df-sb 2090  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753

This theorem is referenced by:  abbidv  2827  abbii  2828  abbid  2829  eqab  2899  sbcbi2  3802  iuneq12df  4975  axrep6g  5239  iotabi  6484  uniabio  6485  iotaval  6489  iotanul  6495  iuneq12daf  32703  bj-abv  37344  bj-cleq  37400  abbi1sn  42795  iotain  44946