Theorem abbi 2834

Description: Equivalent formulas yield equal class abstractions (closed form). This is the backward implication of abbib 2838, proved from fewer axioms, and hence is independently named. (Contributed by BJ and WL and SN, 20-Aug-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
abbi	⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓})

Proof of Theorem abbi

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		spsbbi 2113	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
2		df-clab 2748	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
3		df-clab 2748	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)
4	1, 2, 3	3bitr4g 317	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}))
5	4	eqrdv 2767	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓})

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209  ∀wal 1565   = wceq 1567  [wsb 2097   ∈ wcel 2149  {cab 2747

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1822  ax-4 1836  ax-5 1937  ax-6 1994  ax-7 2035  ax-9 2159  ax-ext 2741

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-ex 1807  df-sb 2098  df-clab 2748  df-cleq 2761

This theorem is referenced by:  abbidv  2835  abbii  2836  abbid  2837  eqab  2907  sbcbi2  3811  iuneq12df  4987  axrep6g  5255  iotabi  6506  uniabio  6507  iotaval  6511  iotanul  6517  iuneq12daf  32842  bj-abv  37430  bj-cleq  37486  abbi1sn  42884  iotain  45019