Theorem abbi 2826

Description: Equivalent formulas yield equal class abstractions (closed form). This is the backward implication of abbib 2830, proved from fewer axioms, and hence is independently named. (Contributed by BJ and WL and SN, 20-Aug-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
abbi	⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓})

Proof of Theorem abbi

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		spsbbi 2110	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
2		df-clab 2740	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
3		df-clab 2740	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)
4	1, 2, 3	3bitr4g 317	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}))
5	4	eqrdv 2759	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓})

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209  ∀wal 1568   = wceq 1570  [wsb 2099   ∈ wcel 2145  {cab 2739

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-9 2155  ax-ext 2733

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753

This theorem is used by:  abbidv  2827  abbii  2828  abbid  2829  eqab  2899  sbcbi2  3797  iuneq12df  4978  axrep6g  5243  iotabi  6507  uniabio  6508  iotaval  6512  iotanul  6518  iuneq12daf  33151  bj-abv  37818  bj-cleq  37875  abbi1sn  43277  iotain  45400