Theorem abbi 2830

Description: Equivalent formulas yield equal class abstractions (closed form). This is the backward implication of abbib 2834, proved from fewer axioms, and hence is independently named. (Contributed by BJ and WL and SN, 20-Aug-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
abbi	⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓})

Proof of Theorem abbi

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		spsbbi 2110	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓))
2		df-clab 2744	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑)
3		df-clab 2744	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ [𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜓)
4	1, 2, 3	3bitr4g 317	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓}))
5	4	eqrdv 2763	1 ⊢ (∀𝑥(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} = {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓})

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209  ∀wal 1568   = wceq 1570  [wsb 2099   ∈ wcel 2146  {cab 2743

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-9 2156  ax-ext 2737

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-ex 1813  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757

This theorem is used by:  abbidv  2831  abbii  2832  abbid  2833  eqab  2903  sbcbi2  3804  iuneq12df  4985  axrep6g  5253  iotabi  6509  uniabio  6510  iotaval  6514  iotanul  6520  iuneq12daf  32976  bj-abv  37602  bj-cleq  37659  abbi1sn  43056  iotain  45204