Theorem notnotrALTVD 44267

Description: The following User's Proof is a Natural Deduction Sequent Calculus transcription of the Fitch-style Natural Deduction proof of Theorem 5 of Section 14 of [Margaris] p. 59 (which is notnotr 130). The same proof may also be interpreted as a Virtual Deduction Hilbert-style axiomatic proof. It was completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. notnotrALT 43881 is notnotrALTVD 44267 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from notnotrALTVD 44267. Step i of the User's Proof corresponds to step i of the Fitch-style proof.

1::	⊢ (   ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶   ¬ ¬ 𝜑   )
2::	⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → (¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ ¬ 𝜑))
3:1:	⊢ (   ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶   (¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ ¬ 𝜑)   )
4::	⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ ¬ 𝜑) → (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑))
5:3:	⊢ (   ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶   (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)   )
6:5,1:	⊢ (   ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶   𝜑   )
qed:6:	⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
notnotrALTVD	⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)

Proof of Theorem notnotrALTVD

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		idn1 43926	. . . . 5 ⊢ (    ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶    ¬ ¬ 𝜑   )
2		pm2.21 123	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → (¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ ¬ 𝜑))
3	1, 2	e1a 43979	. . . 4 ⊢ (    ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶   (¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ ¬ 𝜑)   )
4		con4 113	. . . 4 ⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ ¬ 𝜑) → (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑))
5	3, 4	e1a 43979	. . 3 ⊢ (    ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶   (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)   )
6		id 22	. . 3 ⊢ ((¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑) → (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑))
7	5, 1, 6	e11 44040	. 2 ⊢ (    ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶   𝜑   )
8	7	in1 43923	1 ⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-vd1 43922

This theorem is referenced by: (None)