Theorem notnotrALTVD 45651

Description: The following User's Proof is a Natural Deduction Sequent Calculus transcription of the Fitch-style Natural Deduction proof of Theorem 5 of Section 14 of [Margaris] p. 59 (which is notnotr 131). The same proof may also be interpreted as a Virtual Deduction Hilbert-style axiomatic proof. It was completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. notnotrALT 45266 is notnotrALTVD 45651 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from notnotrALTVD 45651. Step i of the User's Proof corresponds to step i of the Fitch-style proof.

1::	⊢ (   ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶   ¬ ¬ 𝜑   )
2::	⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → (¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ ¬ 𝜑))
3:1:	⊢ (   ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶   (¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ ¬ 𝜑)   )
4::	⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ ¬ 𝜑) → (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑))
5:3:	⊢ (   ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶   (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)   )
6:5,1:	⊢ (   ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶   𝜑   )
qed:6:	⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
notnotrALTVD	⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)

Proof of Theorem notnotrALTVD

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		idn1 45311	. . . . 5 ⊢ (    ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶    ¬ ¬ 𝜑   )
2		pm2.21 124	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → (¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ ¬ 𝜑))
3	1, 2	e1a 45364	. . . 4 ⊢ (    ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶   (¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ ¬ 𝜑)   )
4		con4 114	. . . 4 ⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ ¬ 𝜑) → (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑))
5	3, 4	e1a 45364	. . 3 ⊢ (    ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶   (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)   )
6		id 23	. . 3 ⊢ ((¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑) → (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑))
7	5, 1, 6	e11 45425	. 2 ⊢ (    ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶   𝜑   )
8	7	in1 45308	1 ⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-vd1 45307

This theorem is used by: (None)