Theorem con3ALTVD 46087

Description: The following User's Proof is a Natural Deduction Sequent Calculus transcription of the Fitch-style Natural Deduction proof of Theorem 7 of Section 14 of [Margaris] p. 60 (which is con3 154). The same proof may also be interpreted to be a Virtual Deduction Hilbert-style axiomatic proof. It was completed automatically by the tools program completeusersproof.cmd, which invokes Mel L. O'Cat's mmj2 and Norm Megill's Metamath Proof Assistant. con3ALT2 45702 is con3ALTVD 46087 without virtual deductions and was automatically derived from con3ALTVD 46087. Step i of the User's Proof corresponds to step i of the Fitch-style proof.

1::	⊢ (   (𝜑 → 𝜓)   ▶   (𝜑 → 𝜓)   )
2::	⊢ (   (𝜑 → 𝜓)   ,   ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶   ¬ ¬ 𝜑   )
3::	⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)
4:2:	⊢ (   (𝜑 → 𝜓)   ,   ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶   𝜑   )
5:1,4:	⊢ (   (𝜑 → 𝜓)   ,   ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶   𝜓   )
6::	⊢ (𝜓 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓)
7:6,5:	⊢ (   (𝜑 → 𝜓)   ,   ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶   ¬ ¬ 𝜓   )
8:7:	⊢ (   (𝜑 → 𝜓)   ▶   (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓 )   )
9::	⊢ ((¬ ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑))
10:8:	⊢ (   (𝜑 → 𝜓)   ▶   (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑)   )
qed:10:	⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑))

(Contributed by Alan Sare, 21-Apr-2013.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
con3ALTVD	⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑))

Proof of Theorem con3ALTVD

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		idn1 45746	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (   (𝜑 → 𝜓)   ▶   (𝜑 → 𝜓)   )
2		idn2 45785	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (   (𝜑 → 𝜓)   ,    ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶    ¬ ¬ 𝜑   )
3		notnotr 131	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)
4	2, 3	e2 45803	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (   (𝜑 → 𝜓)   ,    ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶   𝜑   )
5		id 23	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
6	1, 4, 5	e12 45895	. . . . 5 ⊢ (   (𝜑 → 𝜓)   ,    ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶   𝜓   )
7		notnot 143	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜓 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓)
8	6, 7	e2 45803	. . . 4 ⊢ (   (𝜑 → 𝜓)   ,    ¬ ¬ 𝜑   ▶    ¬ ¬ 𝜓   )
9	8	in2 45777	. . 3 ⊢ (   (𝜑 → 𝜓)   ▶   (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓)   )
10		con4 114	. . 3 ⊢ ((¬ ¬ 𝜑 → ¬ ¬ 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑))
11	9, 10	e1a 45799	. 2 ⊢ (   (𝜑 → 𝜓)   ▶   (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑)   )
12	11	in1 45743	1 ⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-vd1 45742  df-vd2 45750

This theorem is used by: (None)