Theorem notnotr 130

Description: Double negation elimination. Converse of notnot 142 and one implication of notnotb 314. Theorem *2.14 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 102. This was the fifth axiom of Frege, specifically Proposition 31 of [Frege1879] p. 44. In classical logic (our logic) this is always true. In intuitionistic logic this is not always true, and formulas for which it is true are called "stable". (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1992.) (Proof shortened by David Harvey, 5-Sep-1999.) (Proof shortened by Josh Purinton, 29-Dec-2000.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
notnotr	⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)

Proof of Theorem notnotr

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		pm2.18 128	. 2 ⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑) → 𝜑)
2	1	jarli 126	1 ⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This theorem is referenced by:  notnotrd  133  con2d  134  con3d  152  notnotb  314  ecase3adOLD  1033  necon1ad  2955  necon4bd  2958  noetasuplem4  27475  eulercrct  29762  notornotel1  37266  mpobi123f  37333  mptbi12f  37337  oexpreposd  41514  axfrege31  42886  clsk1independent  43099  con3ALT2  43593  zfregs2VD  43904  con3ALTVD  43979  notnotrALT2  43990  suplesup  44347