Theorem notnotr 130

Description: Double negation elimination. Converse of notnot 142 and one implication of notnotb 315. Theorem *2.14 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 102. This was the fifth axiom of Frege, specifically Proposition 31 of [Frege1879] p. 44. In classical logic (our logic) this is always true. In intuitionistic logic this is not always true, and formulas for which it is true are called "stable". (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-1992.) (Proof shortened by David Harvey, 5-Sep-1999.) (Proof shortened by Josh Purinton, 29-Dec-2000.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
notnotr	⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)

Proof of Theorem notnotr

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		pm2.18 128	. 2 ⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑) → 𝜑)
2	1	jarli 126	1 ⊢ (¬ ¬ 𝜑 → 𝜑)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This theorem is referenced by:  notnotrd  133  con2d  134  con3d  152  notnotb  315  ecase3adOLD  1036  necon1ad  2958  necon4bd  2961  noetasuplem4  27239  eulercrct  29495  notornotel1  36963  mpobi123f  37030  mptbi12f  37034  oexpreposd  41212  axfrege31  42584  clsk1independent  42797  con3ALT2  43291  zfregs2VD  43602  con3ALTVD  43677  notnotrALT2  43688  suplesup  44049