| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > pm2.24nel | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: A contradiction concerning membership implies anything. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jan-2018.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| pm2.24nel | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∉ 𝐵 → 𝜑)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | df-nel 3038 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∉ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) | |
| 2 | pm2.24 124 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜑)) | |
| 3 | 1, 2 | biimtrid 242 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∉ 𝐵 → 𝜑)) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 → wi 4 ∈ wcel 2109 ∉ wnel 3037 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-nel 3038 |
| This theorem is referenced by: xnn0lenn0nn0 13266 ge2nprmge4 16725 afv2orxorb 47224 isubgr3stgrlem6 47950 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |