P. 31 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 3001-3100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	eqnetrri 3001	Substitution of equal classes into an inequality. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶
Theorem	neeqtri 3002	Substitution of equal classes into an inequality. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶
Theorem	neeqtrri 3003	Substitution of equal classes into an inequality. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶
Theorem	neeqtrrd 3004	Substitution of equal classes into an inequality. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶)
Theorem	eqnetrrid 3005	A chained equality inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-2012.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 19-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐴    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶)
Theorem	3netr3d 3006	Substitution of equality into both sides of an inequality. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2012.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 19-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)
Theorem	3netr4d 3007	Substitution of equality into both sides of an inequality. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2012.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 21-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)
Theorem	3netr3g 3008	Substitution of equality into both sides of an inequality. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐷    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)
Theorem	3netr4g 3009	Substitution of equality into both sides of an inequality. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)
Theorem	nebi 3010	Contraposition law for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 28-Dec-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))
Theorem	pm13.18 3011	Theorem *13.18 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 178. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 29-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)
Theorem	pm13.181 3012	Theorem *13.181 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 178. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 30-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶)
Theorem	pm13.181OLD 3013	Obsolete version of pm13.181 3012 as of 30-Oct-2024. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶)
Theorem	pm2.61ine 3014	Inference eliminating an inequality in an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
Theorem	pm2.21ddne 3015	A contradiction implies anything. Equality/inequality deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	pm2.61ne 3016	Deduction eliminating an inequality in an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	pm2.61dne 3017	Deduction eliminating an inequality in an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	pm2.61dane 3018	Deduction eliminating an inequality in an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	pm2.61da2ne 3019	Deduction eliminating two inequalities in an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷) → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	pm2.61da3ne 3020	Deduction eliminating three inequalities in an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2013.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷) → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐸 = 𝐹) → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐸 ≠ 𝐹)) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	pm2.61iine 3021	Equality version of pm2.61ii 183. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2013.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) → 𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐶 → 𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐷 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
Theorem	mteqand 3022	A modus tollens deduction for inequality. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 1-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	neor 3023	Logical OR with an equality. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝜓))
Theorem	neanior 3024	A De Morgan's law for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷) ↔ ¬ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐶 = 𝐷))
Theorem	ne3anior 3025	A De Morgan's law for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐸 ≠ 𝐹) ↔ ¬ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐶 = 𝐷 ∨ 𝐸 = 𝐹))
Theorem	neorian 3026	A De Morgan's law for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷) ↔ ¬ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷))
Theorem	nemtbir 3027	An inference from an inequality, related to modus tollens. (Contributed by NM, 13-Apr-2007.)
⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝜑
Theorem	nelne1 3028	Two classes are different if they don't contain the same element. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2012.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 14-May-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)
Theorem	nelne2 3029	Two classes are different if they don't belong to the same class. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-2012.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 14-May-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	nelelne 3030	Two classes are different if they don't belong to the same class. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 17-Oct-2010.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-May-2020.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐴))
Theorem	neneor 3031	If two classes are different, a third class must be different of at least one of them. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶))
Theorem	nfne 3032	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵
Theorem	nfned 3033	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	nabbib 3034	Not equivalent wff's correspond to not equal class abstractions. (Contributed by AV, 7-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-Nov-2019.) Definitial form. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 5-Mar-2025.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ≠ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓))
2.1.4.2  Negated membership
Syntax	wnel 3035	Extend wff notation to include negated membership.
wff 𝐴 ∉ 𝐵
Definition	df-nel 3036	Define negated membership. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∉ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	neli 3037	Inference associated with df-nel 3036. (Contributed by BJ, 7-Jul-2018.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∉ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵
Theorem	nelir 3038	Inference associated with df-nel 3036. (Contributed by BJ, 7-Jul-2018.)
⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∉ 𝐵
Theorem	nelcon3d 3039	Contrapositive law deduction for negated membership. (Contributed by AV, 28-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∉ 𝐷 → 𝐴 ∉ 𝐵))
Theorem	neleq12d 3040	Equality theorem for negated membership. (Contributed by FL, 10-Aug-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∉ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ∉ 𝐷))
Theorem	neleq1 3041	Equality theorem for negated membership. (Contributed by NM, 20-Nov-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∉ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ∉ 𝐶))
Theorem	neleq2 3042	Equality theorem for negated membership. (Contributed by NM, 20-Nov-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∉ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ∉ 𝐵))
Theorem	nfnel 3043	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for negated membership. (Contributed by David Abernethy, 26-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ∉ 𝐵
Theorem	nfneld 3044	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for negated membership. (Contributed by David Abernethy, 26-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ∉ 𝐵)
Theorem	nnel 3045	Negation of negated membership, analogous to nne 2933. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 18-Jan-2018.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∉ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	elnelne1 3046	Two classes are different if they don't contain the same element. (Contributed by AV, 28-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∉ 𝐶) → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)
Theorem	elnelne2 3047	Two classes are different if they don't belong to the same class. (Contributed by AV, 28-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∉ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	pm2.24nel 3048	A contradiction concerning membership implies anything. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∉ 𝐵 → 𝜑))
Theorem	pm2.61danel 3049	Deduction eliminating an elementhood in an antecedent. (Contributed by AV, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∉ 𝐵) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
2.1.5  Restricted quantification
2.1.5.1  Restricted universal and existential quantification
Syntax	wral 3050	Extend wff notation to include restricted universal quantification.
wff ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Definition	df-ral 3051	Define restricted universal quantification. Special case of Definition 4.15(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. Note: This notation is most often used to express that 𝜑 holds for all elements of a given class 𝐴. For this reading Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 is required, though, for example, asserted when 𝑥 and 𝐴 are disjoint. Should instead 𝐴 depend on 𝑥, you rather focus on those 𝑥 that happen to be contained in the corresponding 𝐴(𝑥). This hardly used interpretation could still occur naturally. For some examples, look at ralndv1 46623 or ralndv2 46624, courtesy of AV. So be careful to either keep 𝐴 independent of 𝑥, or adjust your comments to include such exotic cases. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-1993.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑))
Theorem	rgen 3052	Generalization rule for restricted quantification. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-1994.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Theorem	ralel 3053	All elements of a class are elements of the class. (Contributed by AV, 30-Oct-2020.)
⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
Theorem	rgenw 3054	Generalization rule for restricted quantification. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Theorem	rgen2w 3055	Generalization rule for restricted quantification. Note that 𝑥 and 𝑦 needn't be distinct. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑
Theorem	mprg 3056	Modus ponens combined with restricted generalization. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜓
Theorem	mprgbir 3057	Modus ponens on biconditional combined with restricted generalization. (Contributed by NM, 21-Mar-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
Theorem	raln 3058	Restricted universally quantified negation expressed as a universally quantified negation. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
Syntax	wrex 3059	Extend wff notation to include restricted existential quantification.
wff ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Definition	df-rex 3060	Define restricted existential quantification. Special case of Definition 4.15(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. Note: This notation is most often used to express that 𝜑 holds for at least one element of a given class 𝐴. For this reading Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 is required, though, for example, asserted when 𝑥 and 𝐴 are disjoint. Should instead 𝐴 depend on 𝑥, you rather assert at least one 𝑥 fulfilling 𝜑 happens to be contained in the corresponding 𝐴(𝑥). This interpretation is rarely needed (see also df-ral 3051). (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	ralnex 3061	Relationship between restricted universal and existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1997.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 16-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	dfrex2 3062	Relationship between restricted universal and existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1997.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 26-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	nrex 3063	Inference adding restricted existential quantifier to negated wff. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓
Theorem	alral 3064	Universal quantification implies restricted quantification. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2006.)
⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	rexex 3065	Restricted existence implies existence. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1995.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	rextru 3066	Two ways of expressing that a class has at least one element. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 23-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ⊤)
Theorem	ralimi2 3067	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2004.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	reximi2 3068	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent, based on Theorem 19.22 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2004.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	ralimia 3069	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-1996.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	reximia 3070	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1997.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 31-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	ralimiaa 3071	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2007.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	ralimi 3072	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent, with strong hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-1997.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	reximi 3073	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-1996.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	ral2imi 3074	Inference quantifying antecedent, nested antecedent, and consequent, with a strong hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2006.) Allow shortening of ralim 3075. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 1-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	ralim 3075	Distribution of restricted quantification over implication. (Contributed by NM, 9-Feb-1997.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 1-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	rexim 3076	Theorem 19.22 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	reximiaOLD 3077	Obsolete version of reximia 3070 as of 31-Oct-2024. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1997.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	ralbii2 3078	Inference adding different restricted universal quantifiers to each side of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-2005.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	rexbii2 3079	Inference adding different restricted existential quantifiers to each side of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2004.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	ralbiia 3080	Inference adding restricted universal quantifier to both sides of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 26-Nov-2000.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	rexbiia 3081	Inference adding restricted existential quantifier to both sides of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-1999.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	ralbii 3082	Inference adding restricted universal quantifier to both sides of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	rexbii 3083	Inference adding restricted existential quantifier to both sides of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	ralanid 3084	Cancellation law for restricted universal quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Dec-2018.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 29-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	rexanid 3085	Cancellation law for restricted existential quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-May-2018.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 8-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	ralcom3 3086	A commutation law for restricted universal quantifiers that swaps the domains of the restriction. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑))
Theorem	ralcom3OLD 3087	Obsolete version of ralcom3 3086 as of 22-Dec-2024. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2004.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑))
Theorem	dfral2 3088	Relationship between restricted universal and existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1997.) Allow shortening of rexnal 3089. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 9-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	rexnal 3089	Relationship between restricted universal and existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1997.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 9-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	ralinexa 3090	A transformation of restricted quantifiers and logical connectives. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	rexanali 3091	A transformation of restricted quantifiers and logical connectives. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2005.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 27-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	ralbi 3092	Distribute a restricted universal quantifier over a biconditional. Restricted quantification version of albi 1812. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2003.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 17-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	rexbi 3093	Distribute restricted quantification over a biconditional. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Aug-2024.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 3-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	rexbiOLD 3094	Obsolete version of rexbi 3093 as of 31-Oct-2024. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Aug-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	ralrexbid 3095	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier, using a restricted universal quantifier to bind the quantified variable in the antecedent. (Contributed by AV, 21-Oct-2023.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by SN, 13-Nov-2023.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜃))
Theorem	ralrexbidOLD 3096	Obsolete version of ralrexbid 3095 as of 4-Nov-2024. (Contributed by AV, 21-Oct-2023.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by SN, 13-Nov-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜃))
Theorem	r19.35 3097	Restricted quantifier version of 19.35 1872. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2003.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.35OLD 3098	Obsolete version of 19.35 1872 as of 22-Dec-2024. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2003.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.26m 3099	Version of 19.26 1865 and r19.26 3100 with restricted quantifiers ranging over different classes. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2004.)
⊢ (∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜓)) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.26 3100	Restricted quantifier version of 19.26 1865. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-1997.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))