P. 31 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 3001-3100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	neeqtrri 3001	Substitution of equal classes into an inequality. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶
Theorem	neeqtrrd 3002	Substitution of equal classes into an inequality. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶)
Theorem	eqnetrrid 3003	A chained equality inference for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-2012.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 19-Nov-2019.)
⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐴    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶)
Theorem	3netr3d 3004	Substitution of equality into both sides of an inequality. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2012.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 19-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)
Theorem	3netr4d 3005	Substitution of equality into both sides of an inequality. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2012.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 21-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)
Theorem	3netr3g 3006	Substitution of equality into both sides of an inequality. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐶    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = 𝐷    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)
Theorem	3netr4g 3007	Substitution of equality into both sides of an inequality. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2012.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐴    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)
Theorem	nebi 3008	Contraposition law for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 28-Dec-2008.)
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ↔ 𝐶 = 𝐷) ↔ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷))
Theorem	pm13.18 3009	Theorem *13.18 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 178. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 29-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)
Theorem	pm13.181 3010	Theorem *13.181 in [WhiteheadRussell] p. 178. (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 30-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶)
Theorem	pm2.61ine 3011	Inference eliminating an inequality in an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
Theorem	pm2.21ddne 3012	A contradiction implies anything. Equality/inequality deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 28-Feb-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	pm2.61ne 3013	Deduction eliminating an inequality in an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	pm2.61dne 3014	Deduction eliminating an inequality in an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2007.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	pm2.61dane 3015	Deduction eliminating an inequality in an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	pm2.61da2ne 3016	Deduction eliminating two inequalities in an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷) → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	pm2.61da3ne 3017	Deduction eliminating three inequalities in an antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-2013.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷) → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐸 = 𝐹) → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐸 ≠ 𝐹)) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	pm2.61iine 3018	Equality version of pm2.61ii 183. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 13-Jun-2013.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐷) → 𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐶 → 𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝐵 = 𝐷 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
Theorem	mteqand 3019	A modus tollens deduction for inequality. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 1-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	neor 3020	Logical OR with an equality. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝜓))
Theorem	neanior 3021	A De Morgan's law for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷) ↔ ¬ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐶 = 𝐷))
Theorem	ne3anior 3022	A De Morgan's law for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2013.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷 ∧ 𝐸 ≠ 𝐹) ↔ ¬ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∨ 𝐶 = 𝐷 ∨ 𝐸 = 𝐹))
Theorem	neorian 3023	A De Morgan's law for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 18-May-2007.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐶 ≠ 𝐷) ↔ ¬ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷))
Theorem	nemtbir 3024	An inference from an inequality, related to modus tollens. (Contributed by NM, 13-Apr-2007.)
⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵    &   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝜑
Theorem	nelne1 3025	Two classes are different if they don't contain the same element. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2012.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 14-May-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)
Theorem	nelne2 3026	Two classes are different if they don't belong to the same class. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jun-2012.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 14-May-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	nelelne 3027	Two classes are different if they don't belong to the same class. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 17-Oct-2010.) (Proof shortened by AV, 10-May-2020.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐶 ≠ 𝐴))
Theorem	neneor 3028	If two classes are different, a third class must be different of at least one of them. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 8-Aug-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶))
Theorem	nfne 3029	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵
Theorem	nfned 3030	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for inequality. (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	nabbib 3031	Not equivalent wff's correspond to not equal class abstractions. (Contributed by AV, 7-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-Nov-2019.) Definitial form. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 5-Mar-2025.)
⊢ ({𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ≠ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓))
2.1.4.2  Negated membership
Syntax	wnel 3032	Extend wff notation to include negated membership.
wff 𝐴 ∉ 𝐵
Definition	df-nel 3033	Define negated membership. (Contributed by NM, 7-Aug-1994.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∉ 𝐵 ↔ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	neli 3034	Inference associated with df-nel 3033. (Contributed by BJ, 7-Jul-2018.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∉ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵
Theorem	nelir 3035	Inference associated with df-nel 3033. (Contributed by BJ, 7-Jul-2018.)
⊢ ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∉ 𝐵
Theorem	nelcon3d 3036	Contrapositive law deduction for negated membership. (Contributed by AV, 28-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∉ 𝐷 → 𝐴 ∉ 𝐵))
Theorem	neleq12d 3037	Equality theorem for negated membership. (Contributed by FL, 10-Aug-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∉ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ∉ 𝐷))
Theorem	neleq1 3038	Equality theorem for negated membership. (Contributed by NM, 20-Nov-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∉ 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵 ∉ 𝐶))
Theorem	neleq2 3039	Equality theorem for negated membership. (Contributed by NM, 20-Nov-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 ∉ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐶 ∉ 𝐵))
Theorem	nfnel 3040	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for negated membership. (Contributed by David Abernethy, 26-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ∉ 𝐵
Theorem	nfneld 3041	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for negated membership. (Contributed by David Abernethy, 26-Jun-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝐴 ∉ 𝐵)
Theorem	nnel 3042	Negation of negated membership, analogous to nne 2932. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 18-Jan-2018.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∉ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	elnelne1 3043	Two classes are different if they don't contain the same element. (Contributed by AV, 28-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∉ 𝐶) → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)
Theorem	elnelne2 3044	Two classes are different if they don't belong to the same class. (Contributed by AV, 28-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∉ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	pm2.24nel 3045	A contradiction concerning membership implies anything. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-Jan-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∉ 𝐵 → 𝜑))
Theorem	pm2.61danel 3046	Deduction eliminating an elementhood in an antecedent. (Contributed by AV, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐴 ∉ 𝐵) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)
2.1.5  Restricted quantification
2.1.5.1  Restricted universal and existential quantification
Syntax	wral 3047	Extend wff notation to include restricted universal quantification.
wff ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Definition	df-ral 3048	Define restricted universal quantification. Special case of Definition 4.15(3) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. Note: This notation is most often used to express that 𝜑 holds for all elements of a given class 𝐴. For this reading Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 is required, though, for example, asserted when 𝑥 and 𝐴 are disjoint. Should instead 𝐴 depend on 𝑥, you rather focus on those 𝑥 that happen to be contained in the corresponding 𝐴(𝑥). This hardly used interpretation could still occur naturally. For some examples, look at ralndv1 47135 or ralndv2 47136, courtesy of AV. So be careful to either keep 𝐴 independent of 𝑥, or adjust your comments to include such exotic cases. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-1993.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑))
Theorem	rgen 3049	Generalization rule for restricted quantification. (Contributed by NM, 19-Nov-1994.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Theorem	ralel 3050	All elements of a class are elements of the class. (Contributed by AV, 30-Oct-2020.)
⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴
Theorem	rgenw 3051	Generalization rule for restricted quantification. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Theorem	rgen2w 3052	Generalization rule for restricted quantification. Note that 𝑥 and 𝑦 needn't be distinct. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑
Theorem	mprg 3053	Modus ponens combined with restricted generalization. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-2004.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜓
Theorem	mprgbir 3054	Modus ponens on biconditional combined with restricted generalization. (Contributed by NM, 21-Mar-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝜑
Theorem	raln 3055	Restricted universally quantified negation expressed as a universally quantified negation. (Contributed by BJ, 16-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ¬ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
Syntax	wrex 3056	Extend wff notation to include restricted existential quantification.
wff ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑
Definition	df-rex 3057	Define restricted existential quantification. Special case of Definition 4.15(4) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 22. Note: This notation is most often used to express that 𝜑 holds for at least one element of a given class 𝐴. For this reading Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 is required, though, for example, asserted when 𝑥 and 𝐴 are disjoint. Should instead 𝐴 depend on 𝑥, you rather assert at least one 𝑥 fulfilling 𝜑 happens to be contained in the corresponding 𝐴(𝑥). This interpretation is rarely needed (see also df-ral 3048). (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	ralnex 3058	Relationship between restricted universal and existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1997.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 16-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	dfrex2 3059	Relationship between restricted universal and existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1997.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 26-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	nrex 3060	Inference adding restricted existential quantifier to negated wff. (Contributed by NM, 16-Oct-2003.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓
Theorem	alral 3061	Universal quantification implies restricted quantification. (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2006.)
⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	rexex 3062	Restricted existence implies existence. (Contributed by NM, 11-Nov-1995.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	rextru 3063	Two ways of expressing that a class has at least one element. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 23-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ⊤)
Theorem	ralimi2 3064	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2004.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	reximi2 3065	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent, based on Theorem 19.22 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2004.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	ralimia 3066	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-1996.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	reximia 3067	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1997.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 31-Oct-2024.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	ralimiaa 3068	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent. (Contributed by NM, 4-Aug-2007.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	ralimi 3069	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent, with strong hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-1997.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	reximi 3070	Inference quantifying both antecedent and consequent. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-1996.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	ral2imi 3071	Inference quantifying antecedent, nested antecedent, and consequent, with a strong hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2006.) Allow shortening of ralim 3072. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 1-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	ralim 3072	Distribution of restricted quantification over implication. (Contributed by NM, 9-Feb-1997.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 1-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	rexim 3073	Theorem 19.22 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Restricted quantifier version.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	ralbii2 3074	Inference adding different restricted universal quantifiers to each side of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 15-Aug-2005.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	rexbii2 3075	Inference adding different restricted existential quantifiers to each side of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2004.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)
Theorem	ralbiia 3076	Inference adding restricted universal quantifier to both sides of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 26-Nov-2000.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	rexbiia 3077	Inference adding restricted existential quantifier to both sides of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-1999.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	ralbii 3078	Inference adding restricted universal quantifier to both sides of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	rexbii 3079	Inference adding restricted existential quantifier to both sides of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 17-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)
Theorem	ralanid 3080	Cancellation law for restricted universal quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Dec-2018.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 29-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	rexanid 3081	Cancellation law for restricted existential quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-May-2018.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 8-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	ralcom3 3082	A commutation law for restricted universal quantifiers that swaps the domains of the restriction. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜑) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑))
Theorem	dfral2 3083	Relationship between restricted universal and existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1997.) Allow shortening of rexnal 3084. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 9-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	rexnal 3084	Relationship between restricted universal and existential quantifiers. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1997.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 9-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑)
Theorem	ralinexa 3085	A transformation of restricted quantifiers and logical connectives. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2005.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	rexanali 3086	A transformation of restricted quantifiers and logical connectives. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2005.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 27-Dec-2019.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	ralbi 3087	Distribute a restricted universal quantifier over a biconditional. Restricted quantification version of albi 1819. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2003.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 17-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	rexbi 3088	Distribute restricted quantification over a biconditional. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Aug-2024.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 3-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	ralrexbid 3089	Formula-building rule for restricted existential quantifier, using a restricted universal quantifier to bind the quantified variable in the antecedent. (Contributed by AV, 21-Oct-2023.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by SN, 13-Nov-2023.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜃))
Theorem	r19.35 3090	Restricted quantifier version of 19.35 1878. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2003.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Dec-2024.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.26m 3091	Version of 19.26 1871 and r19.26 3092 with restricted quantifiers ranging over different classes. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-2004.)
⊢ (∀𝑥((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝜓)) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.26 3092	Restricted quantifier version of 19.26 1871. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-1997.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.26-3 3093	Version of r19.26 3092 with three quantifiers. (Contributed by FL, 22-Nov-2010.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒))
Theorem	ralbiim 3094	Split a biconditional and distribute quantifier. Restricted quantifier version of albiim 1890. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2012.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 → 𝜑)))
Theorem	r19.29 3095	Restricted quantifier version of 19.29 1874. See also r19.29r 3096. (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 22-Dec-2024.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.29r 3096	Restricted quantifier version of 19.29r 1875; variation of r19.29 3095. (Contributed by NM, 31-Aug-1999.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 29-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ((∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.29imd 3097	Theorem 19.29 of [Margaris] p. 90 with an implication in the hypothesis containing the generalization, deduction version. (Contributed by AV, 19-Jan-2019.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	r19.40 3098	Restricted quantifier version of Theorem 19.40 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-2004.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.30 3099	Restricted quantifier version of 19.30 1882. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Feb-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))
Theorem	r19.43 3100	Restricted quantifier version of 19.43 1883. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 30-May-2011.)
⊢ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) ↔ (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ∨ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓))