Theorem re1luk3 1716

Description: luk-3 1661 derived from the Tarski-Bernays-Wajsberg axioms.

This theorem, along with re1luk1 1714 and re1luk2 1715 proves that tbw-ax1 1704, tbw-ax2 1705, tbw-ax3 1706, and tbw-ax4 1707, with ax-mp 5 can be used as a complete axiom system for all of propositional calculus. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 16-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
re1luk3	⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓))

Proof of Theorem re1luk3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tbw-negdf 1703	. . 3 ⊢ (((¬ 𝜑 → (𝜑 → ⊥)) → (((𝜑 → ⊥) → ¬ 𝜑) → ⊥)) → ⊥)
2		tbwlem5 1713	. . 3 ⊢ ((((¬ 𝜑 → (𝜑 → ⊥)) → (((𝜑 → ⊥) → ¬ 𝜑) → ⊥)) → ⊥) → (¬ 𝜑 → (𝜑 → ⊥)))
3	1, 2	ax-mp 5	. 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → (𝜑 → ⊥))
4		tbw-ax4 1707	. . . 4 ⊢ (⊥ → 𝜓)
5		tbw-ax1 1704	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 → ⊥) → ((⊥ → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜓)))
6		tbwlem1 1709	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝜑 → ⊥) → ((⊥ → 𝜓) → (𝜑 → 𝜓))) → ((⊥ → 𝜓) → ((𝜑 → ⊥) → (𝜑 → 𝜓))))
7	5, 6	ax-mp 5	. . . 4 ⊢ ((⊥ → 𝜓) → ((𝜑 → ⊥) → (𝜑 → 𝜓)))
8	4, 7	ax-mp 5	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 → ⊥) → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
9		tbwlem1 1709	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝜑 → ⊥) → (𝜑 → 𝜓)) → (𝜑 → ((𝜑 → ⊥) → 𝜓)))
10	8, 9	ax-mp 5	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜑 → ⊥) → 𝜓))
11		tbw-ax1 1704	. 2 ⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 → (𝜑 → ⊥)) → (((𝜑 → ⊥) → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓)))
12	3, 10, 11	mpsyl 68	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4  ⊥wfal 1551

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552

This theorem is referenced by: (None)