Theorem merco1 1746

Description: A single axiom for propositional calculus discovered by C. A. Meredith.

This axiom is worthy of note, due to it having only 19 symbols, not counting parentheses. The more well-known meredith 1674 has 21 symbols, sans parentheses.

See merco2 1769 for another axiom of equal length. (Contributed by Anthony Hart, 13-Aug-2011.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
merco1	⊢ (((((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜒 → ⊥)) → 𝜃) → 𝜏) → ((𝜏 → 𝜑) → (𝜒 → 𝜑)))

Proof of Theorem merco1

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax-1 6	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ 𝜒 → (¬ 𝜃 → ¬ 𝜒))
2		falim 1587	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (⊥ → (¬ 𝜃 → ¬ 𝜒))
3	1, 2	ja 188	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜒 → ⊥) → (¬ 𝜃 → ¬ 𝜒))
4	3	imim2i 17	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜒 → ⊥)) → ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜃 → ¬ 𝜒)))
5	4	imim1i 64	. . 3 ⊢ ((((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜃 → ¬ 𝜒)) → 𝜃) → (((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜒 → ⊥)) → 𝜃))
6	5	imim1i 64	. 2 ⊢ (((((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜒 → ⊥)) → 𝜃) → 𝜏) → ((((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜃 → ¬ 𝜒)) → 𝜃) → 𝜏))
7		meredith 1674	. 2 ⊢ (((((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (¬ 𝜃 → ¬ 𝜒)) → 𝜃) → 𝜏) → ((𝜏 → 𝜑) → (𝜒 → 𝜑)))
8	6, 7	syl 18	1 ⊢ (((((𝜑 → 𝜓) → (𝜒 → ⊥)) → 𝜃) → 𝜏) → ((𝜏 → 𝜑) → (𝜒 → 𝜑)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4  ⊥wfal 1582

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583

This theorem is used by:  merco1lem1  1747  retbwax2  1749  merco1lem2  1750  merco1lem4  1752  merco1lem5  1753  merco1lem6  1754  merco1lem7  1755  merco1lem10  1759  merco1lem11  1760  merco1lem12  1761  merco1lem13  1762  merco1lem14  1763  merco1lem16  1765  merco1lem17  1766  merco1lem18  1767  retbwax1  1768