Theorem wl-axc11rc11 34850

Description: Proving axc11r 2385 from axc11 2451. The hypotheses are two instances of axc11 2451 used in the proof here. Some systems introduce axc11 2451 as an axiom, see for example System S2 in https://us.metamath.org/downloads/finiteaxiom.pdf .

By contrast, this database sees the variant axc11r 2385, directly derived from ax-12 2176, as foundational. Later axc11 2451 is proven somewhat trickily, requiring ax-10 2144 and ax-13 2389, see its proof. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 18-Jul-2023.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
wl-axc11rc11.1	⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑥))
wl-axc11rc11.2	⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
wl-axc11rc11	⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑))

Proof of Theorem wl-axc11rc11

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		wl-axc11rc11.1	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑥))
2	1	pm2.43i 52	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → ∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑥)
3		equcomi 2023	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝑥 = 𝑦)
4	3	alimi 1811	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑦 = 𝑥 → ∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦)
5		wl-axc11rc11.2	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑦 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑))
6	2, 4, 5	3syl 18	1 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4  ∀wal 1534

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2014

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-ex 1780

This theorem is referenced by: (None)