Theorem axc11r 2367

Description: Same as axc11 2429 but with reversed antecedent. Note the use of ax-12 2178 (and not merely ax12v 2179 as in axc11rv 2266).

This theorem is mostly used to eliminate conditions requiring set variables be distinct (cf. cbvaev 2054 and aecom 2426, for example) in proofs. In practice, theorems beyond elementary set theory do not really benefit from such eliminations. As of 2024, it is used in conjunction with ax-13 2371 only, and like that, it should be applied only in niches where indispensable. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
axc11r	⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑))

Proof of Theorem axc11r

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax-12 2178	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝜑)))
2	1	sps 2186	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝜑)))
3		pm2.27 42	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ((𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝜑) → 𝜑))
4	3	al2imi 1815	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝜑) → ∀𝑦𝜑))
5	2, 4	syld 47	1 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4  ∀wal 1538

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-12 2178

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-ex 1780

This theorem is referenced by:  ax12  2422  axc11n  2425  axc11  2429  hbae  2430  dral1  2438  dral1ALT  2439  sb4a  2479  axpowndlem3  10559  axc11n11r  36678  bj-ax12v3ALT  36681  bj-hbaeb2  36813