Theorem axc11r 2366

Description: Same as axc11 2428 but with reversed antecedent. Note the use of ax-12 2178 (and not merely ax12v 2179 as in axc11rv 2266).

This theorem is mostly used to eliminate conditions requiring set variables be distinct (cf. cbvaev 2054 and aecom 2425, for example) in proofs. In practice, theorems beyond elementary set theory do not really benefit from such eliminations. As of 2024, it is used in conjunction with ax-13 2370 only, and like that, it should be applied only in niches where indispensable. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
axc11r	⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑))

Proof of Theorem axc11r

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax-12 2178	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝜑)))
2	1	sps 2186	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝜑)))
3		pm2.27 42	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ((𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝜑) → 𝜑))
4	3	al2imi 1815	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝜑) → ∀𝑦𝜑))
5	2, 4	syld 47	1 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4  ∀wal 1538

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-12 2178

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-ex 1780

This theorem is referenced by:  ax12  2421  axc11n  2424  axc11  2428  hbae  2429  dral1  2437  dral1ALT  2438  sb4a  2478  axpowndlem3  10552  axc11n11r  36671  bj-ax12v3ALT  36674  bj-hbaeb2  36806