Theorem axc11r 2373

Description: Same as axc11 2435 but with reversed antecedent. Note the use of ax-12 2185 (and not merely ax12v 2186 as in axc11rv 2273).

This theorem is mostly used to eliminate conditions requiring set variables be distinct (cf. cbvaev 2057 and aecom 2432, for example) in proofs. In practice, theorems beyond elementary set theory do not really benefit from such eliminations. As of 2024, it is used in conjunction with ax-13 2377 only, and like that, it should be applied only in niches where indispensable. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
axc11r	⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑))

Proof of Theorem axc11r

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax-12 2185	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝜑)))
2	1	sps 2193	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝜑)))
3		pm2.27 42	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → ((𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝜑) → 𝜑))
4	3	al2imi 1817	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝑥 → 𝜑) → ∀𝑦𝜑))
5	2, 4	syld 47	1 ⊢ (∀𝑦 𝑦 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4  ∀wal 1540

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-12 2185

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-ex 1782

This theorem is referenced by:  ax12  2428  axc11n  2431  axc11  2435  hbae  2436  dral1  2444  dral1ALT  2445  sb4a  2485  axpowndlem3  10522  axc11n11r  36922  bj-ax12v3ALT  36925  bj-hbaeb2  37060