P. 366 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 36501-36600   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	brifs 36501	Binary relation form of the inner five segment predicate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩⟩ InnerFiveSeg ⟨⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩, ⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩⟩ ↔ ((𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐹 Btwn ⟨𝐸, 𝐺⟩) ∧ (⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝐺⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩Cgr⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩) ∧ (⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝐻⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩))))
Theorem	ifscgr 36502	Inner five segment congruence. Take two triangles, 𝐴𝐷𝐶 and 𝐸𝐻𝐺, with 𝐵 between 𝐴 and 𝐶 and 𝐹 between 𝐸 and 𝐺. If the other components of the triangles are congruent, then so are 𝐵𝐷 and 𝐹𝐻. Theorem 4.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 34. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Sep-2013.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩⟩ InnerFiveSeg ⟨⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩, ⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩⟩ → ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐹, 𝐻⟩))
Theorem	cgrsub 36503	Removing identical parts from the end of a line segment preserves congruence. Theorem 4.3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 35. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (((𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐷, 𝐹⟩) ∧ (⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐹⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩)) → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐸⟩))
Theorem	brcgr3 36504	Binary relation form of the three-place congruence predicate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐷, ⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩⟩ ↔ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐸⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐹⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩)))
Theorem	cgr3permute3 36505	Permutation law for three-place congruence. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐷, ⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩⟩ ↔ ⟨𝐵, ⟨𝐶, 𝐴⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐸, ⟨𝐹, 𝐷⟩⟩))
Theorem	cgr3permute1 36506	Permutation law for three-place congruence. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐷, ⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩⟩ ↔ ⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐷, ⟨𝐹, 𝐸⟩⟩))
Theorem	cgr3permute2 36507	Permutation law for three-place congruence. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐷, ⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩⟩ ↔ ⟨𝐵, ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐸, ⟨𝐷, 𝐹⟩⟩))
Theorem	cgr3permute4 36508	Permutation law for three-place congruence. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐷, ⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩⟩ ↔ ⟨𝐶, ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐹, ⟨𝐷, 𝐸⟩⟩))
Theorem	cgr3permute5 36509	Permutation law for three-place congruence. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐷, ⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩⟩ ↔ ⟨𝐶, ⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐹, ⟨𝐸, 𝐷⟩⟩))
Theorem	cgr3tr4 36510	Transitivity law for three-place congruence. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ ((𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)))) → ((⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐷, ⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐺, ⟨𝐻, 𝐼⟩⟩) → ⟨𝐷, ⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐺, ⟨𝐻, 𝐼⟩⟩))
Theorem	cgr3com 36511	Commutativity law for three-place congruence. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐷, ⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩⟩ ↔ ⟨𝐷, ⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩))
Theorem	cgr3rflx 36512	Identity law for three-place congruence. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩)
Theorem	cgrxfr 36513*	A line segment can be divided at the same place as a congruent line segment is divided. Theorem 4.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 35. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐹⟩) → ∃𝑒 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)(𝑒 Btwn ⟨𝐷, 𝐹⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐷, ⟨𝑒, 𝐹⟩⟩)))
Theorem	btwnxfr 36514	A condition for extending betweenness to a new set of points based on congruence with another set of points. Theorem 4.6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 36. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐷, ⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩⟩) → 𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐷, 𝐹⟩))
Theorem	colinrel 36515	Colinearity is a relationship. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ Rel Colinear
Theorem	brcolinear2 36516*	Alternate colinearity binary relation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑄 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑃 Colinear ⟨𝑄, 𝑅⟩ ↔ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ((𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)) ∧ (𝑃 Btwn ⟨𝑄, 𝑅⟩ ∨ 𝑄 Btwn ⟨𝑅, 𝑃⟩ ∨ 𝑅 Btwn ⟨𝑃, 𝑄⟩))))
Theorem	brcolinear 36517	The binary relation form of the colinearity predicate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐴 Colinear ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ (𝐴 Btwn ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∨ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐶, 𝐴⟩ ∨ 𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)))
Theorem	colinearex 36518	The colinear predicate exists. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ Colinear ∈ V
Theorem	colineardim1 36519	If 𝐴 is colinear with 𝐵 and 𝐶, then 𝐴 is in the same space as 𝐵. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)) → (𝐴 Colinear ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)))
Theorem	colinearperm1 36520	Permutation law for colinearity. Part of theorem 4.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 36. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐴 Colinear ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ 𝐴 Colinear ⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩))
Theorem	colinearperm3 36521	Permutation law for colinearity. Part of theorem 4.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 36. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐴 Colinear ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ 𝐵 Colinear ⟨𝐶, 𝐴⟩))
Theorem	colinearperm2 36522	Permutation law for colinearity. Part of theorem 4.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 36. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐴 Colinear ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ 𝐵 Colinear ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩))
Theorem	colinearperm4 36523	Permutation law for colinearity. Part of theorem 4.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 36. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐴 Colinear ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ 𝐶 Colinear ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩))
Theorem	colinearperm5 36524	Permutation law for colinearity. Part of theorem 4.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 36. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐴 Colinear ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ 𝐶 Colinear ⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩))
Theorem	colineartriv1 36525	Trivial case of colinearity. Theorem 4.12 of [Schwabhauser] p. 37. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 𝐴 Colinear ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)
Theorem	colineartriv2 36526	Trivial case of colinearity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → 𝐴 Colinear ⟨𝐵, 𝐵⟩)
Theorem	btwncolinear1 36527	Betweenness implies colinearity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ → 𝐴 Colinear ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩))
Theorem	btwncolinear2 36528	Betweenness implies colinearity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ → 𝐴 Colinear ⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩))
Theorem	btwncolinear3 36529	Betweenness implies colinearity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ → 𝐵 Colinear ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩))
Theorem	btwncolinear4 36530	Betweenness implies colinearity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ → 𝐵 Colinear ⟨𝐶, 𝐴⟩))
Theorem	btwncolinear5 36531	Betweenness implies colinearity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ → 𝐶 Colinear ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩))
Theorem	btwncolinear6 36532	Betweenness implies colinearity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ → 𝐶 Colinear ⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩))
Theorem	colinearxfr 36533	Transfer law for colinearity. Theorem 4.13 of [Schwabhauser] p. 37. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐵 Colinear ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐷, ⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩⟩) → 𝐸 Colinear ⟨𝐷, 𝐹⟩))
Theorem	lineext 36534*	Extend a line with a missing point. Theorem 4.14 of [Schwabhauser] p. 37. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐴 Colinear ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐸⟩) → ∃𝑓 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐷, ⟨𝐸, 𝑓⟩⟩))
Theorem	brofs2 36535	Change some conditions for outer five segment predicate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2013.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩⟩ OuterFiveSeg ⟨⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩, ⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩⟩ ↔ (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐸, ⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩⟩ ∧ (⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝐻⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐹, 𝐻⟩))))
Theorem	brifs2 36536	Change some conditions for inner five segment predicate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2013.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩⟩ InnerFiveSeg ⟨⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩, ⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩⟩ ↔ (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐸, ⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩⟩ ∧ (⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝐻⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩))))
Theorem	brfs 36537	Binary relation form of the general five segment predicate. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩⟩ FiveSeg ⟨⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩, ⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩⟩ ↔ (𝐴 Colinear ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩⟩Cgr3⟨𝐸, ⟨𝐹, 𝐺⟩⟩ ∧ (⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝐻⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐹, 𝐻⟩))))
Theorem	fscgr 36538	Congruence law for the general five segment configuration. Theorem 4.16 of [Schwabhauser] p. 37. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Oct-2013.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩⟩ FiveSeg ⟨⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩, ⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩⟩ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩))
Theorem	linecgr 36539	Congruence rule for lines. Theorem 4.17 of [Schwabhauser] p. 37. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 Colinear ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩) ∧ (⟨𝐴, 𝑃⟩Cgr⟨𝐴, 𝑄⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐵, 𝑃⟩Cgr⟨𝐵, 𝑄⟩)) → ⟨𝐶, 𝑃⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝑄⟩))
Theorem	linecgrand 36540	Deduction form of linecgr 36539. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Oct-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐴 Colinear ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ⟨𝐴, 𝑃⟩Cgr⟨𝐴, 𝑄⟩)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ⟨𝐵, 𝑃⟩Cgr⟨𝐵, 𝑄⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ⟨𝐶, 𝑃⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝑄⟩)
Theorem	lineid 36541	Identity law for points on lines. Theorem 4.18 of [Schwabhauser] p. 38. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 Colinear ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩) ∧ (⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩Cgr⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩Cgr⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩)) → 𝐶 = 𝐷))
Theorem	idinside 36542	Law for finding a point inside a segment. Theorem 4.19 of [Schwabhauser] p. 38. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩Cgr⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩Cgr⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩) → 𝐶 = 𝐷))
Theorem	endofsegid 36543	If 𝐴, 𝐵, and 𝐶 fall in order on a line, and 𝐴𝐵 and 𝐴𝐶 are congruent, then 𝐶 = 𝐵. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩Cgr⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) → 𝐶 = 𝐵))
Theorem	endofsegidand 36544	Deduction form of endofsegid 36543. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝐵 = 𝐶)
21.11.17.5  Connectivity of betweenness
Theorem	btwnconn1lem1 36545	Lemma for btwnconn1 36559. The next several lemmas introduce various properties of hypothetical points that end up eliminating alternatives to connectivity. We begin by showing a congruence property of those hypothetical points. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ (((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑐⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐷, 𝑐⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑑⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑑⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑐, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑋⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑑, 𝑋⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐵⟩)))) → ⟨𝐵, 𝑐⟩Cgr⟨𝑋, 𝐶⟩)
Theorem	btwnconn1lem2 36546	Lemma for btwnconn1 36559. Now, we show that two of the hypotheticals we introduced in the first lemma are identical. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ (((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑐⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐷, 𝑐⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑑⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑑⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑐, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑋⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑑, 𝑋⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐵⟩)))) → 𝑋 = 𝑏)
Theorem	btwnconn1lem3 36547	Lemma for btwnconn1 36559. Establish the next congruence in the series. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ (((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑐⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐷, 𝑐⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑑⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑑⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑐, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑑, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐵⟩)))) → ⟨𝐵, 𝑑⟩Cgr⟨𝑏, 𝐷⟩)
Theorem	btwnconn1lem4 36548	Lemma for btwnconn1 36559. Assuming 𝐶 ≠ 𝑐, we now attempt to force 𝐷 = 𝑑 from here out via a series of congruences. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ (((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝑐) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑐⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐷, 𝑐⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑑⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑑⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑐, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑑, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐵⟩)))) → ⟨𝑑, 𝑐⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐶⟩)
Theorem	btwnconn1lem5 36549	Lemma for btwnconn1 36559. Now, we introduce 𝐸, the intersection of 𝐶𝑐 and 𝐷𝑑. We begin by showing that it is the midpoint of 𝐶 and 𝑐. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ ((((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝑐) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑐⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐷, 𝑐⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑑⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑑⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑐, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑑, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐵⟩))) ∧ (𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐶, 𝑐⟩ ∧ 𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐷, 𝑑⟩))) → ⟨𝐸, 𝐶⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝑐⟩)
Theorem	btwnconn1lem6 36550	Lemma for btwnconn1 36559. Next, we show that 𝐸 is the midpoint of 𝐷 and 𝑑. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ ((((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝑐) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑐⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐷, 𝑐⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑑⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑑⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑐, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑑, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐵⟩))) ∧ (𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐶, 𝑐⟩ ∧ 𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐷, 𝑑⟩))) → ⟨𝐸, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝑑⟩)
Theorem	btwnconn1lem7 36551	Lemma for btwnconn1 36559. Under our assumptions, 𝐶 and 𝑑 are distinct. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ ((((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝑐) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑐⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐷, 𝑐⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑑⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑑⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑐, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑑, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐵⟩))) ∧ (𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐶, 𝑐⟩ ∧ 𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐷, 𝑑⟩))) → 𝐶 ≠ 𝑑)
Theorem	btwnconn1lem8 36552	Lemma for btwnconn1 36559. Now, we introduce the last three points used in the construction: 𝑃, 𝑄, and 𝑅 will turn out to be equal further down, and will provide us with the key to the final statement. We begin by establishing congruence of 𝑅𝑃 and 𝐸𝑑. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ ((𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ ((((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝑐) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑐⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐷, 𝑐⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑑⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑑⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑐, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑑, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐵⟩))) ∧ ((𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐶, 𝑐⟩ ∧ 𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐷, 𝑑⟩) ∧ ((𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝑐, 𝑃⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑃⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝑑⟩) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝑑, 𝑅⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑅⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐸⟩) ∧ (𝑅 Btwn ⟨𝑃, 𝑄⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑅, 𝑄⟩Cgr⟨𝑅, 𝑃⟩))))) → ⟨𝑅, 𝑃⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝑑⟩)
Theorem	btwnconn1lem9 36553	Lemma for btwnconn1 36559. Now, a quick use of transitivity to establish congruence on 𝑅𝑄 and 𝐸𝐷. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ ((𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ ((((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝑐) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑐⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐷, 𝑐⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑑⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑑⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑐, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑑, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐵⟩))) ∧ ((𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐶, 𝑐⟩ ∧ 𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐷, 𝑑⟩) ∧ ((𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝑐, 𝑃⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑃⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝑑⟩) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝑑, 𝑅⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑅⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐸⟩) ∧ (𝑅 Btwn ⟨𝑃, 𝑄⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑅, 𝑄⟩Cgr⟨𝑅, 𝑃⟩))))) → ⟨𝑅, 𝑄⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝐷⟩)
Theorem	btwnconn1lem10 36554	Lemma for btwnconn1 36559. Now we establish a congruence that will give us 𝐷 = 𝑑 when we compute 𝑃 = 𝑄 later on. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ ((𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ ((((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝑐) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑐⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐷, 𝑐⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑑⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑑⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑐, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑑, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐵⟩))) ∧ ((𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐶, 𝑐⟩ ∧ 𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐷, 𝑑⟩) ∧ ((𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝑐, 𝑃⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑃⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝑑⟩) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝑑, 𝑅⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑅⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐸⟩) ∧ (𝑅 Btwn ⟨𝑃, 𝑄⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑅, 𝑄⟩Cgr⟨𝑅, 𝑃⟩))))) → ⟨𝑑, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝑃, 𝑄⟩)
Theorem	btwnconn1lem11 36555	Lemma for btwnconn1 36559. Now, we establish that 𝐷 and 𝑄 are equidistant from 𝐶. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 8-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ ((𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ ((((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝑐) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑐⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐷, 𝑐⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑑⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑑⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑐, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑑, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐵⟩))) ∧ ((𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐶, 𝑐⟩ ∧ 𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐷, 𝑑⟩) ∧ ((𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝑐, 𝑃⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑃⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝑑⟩) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝑑, 𝑅⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑅⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐸⟩) ∧ (𝑅 Btwn ⟨𝑃, 𝑄⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑅, 𝑄⟩Cgr⟨𝑅, 𝑃⟩))))) → ⟨𝐷, 𝐶⟩Cgr⟨𝑄, 𝐶⟩)
Theorem	btwnconn1lem12 36556	Lemma for btwnconn1 36559. Using a long string of invocations of linecgr 36539, we show that 𝐷 = 𝑑. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ ((𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑄 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ ((((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝑐) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑐⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐷, 𝑐⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑑⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑑⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑐, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑑, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐵⟩))) ∧ ((𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐶, 𝑐⟩ ∧ 𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐷, 𝑑⟩) ∧ ((𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝑐, 𝑃⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑃⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝑑⟩) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝑑, 𝑅⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑅⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐸⟩) ∧ (𝑅 Btwn ⟨𝑃, 𝑄⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑅, 𝑄⟩Cgr⟨𝑅, 𝑃⟩))))) → 𝐷 = 𝑑)
Theorem	btwnconn1lem13 36557	Lemma for btwnconn1 36559. Begin back-filling and eliminating hypotheses. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ ((𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)))) ∧ (((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑐⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐷, 𝑐⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩) ∧ (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑑⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝑑⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩)) ∧ ((𝑐 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑐, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐵⟩) ∧ (𝑑 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑏⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑑, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝐷, 𝐵⟩)))) → (𝐶 = 𝑐 ∨ 𝐷 = 𝑑))
Theorem	btwnconn1lem14 36558	Lemma for btwnconn1 36559. Final statement of the theorem when 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Oct-2013.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) ∧ ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ∧ (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩))) → (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩ ∨ 𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩))
Theorem	btwnconn1 36559	Connectitivy law for betweenness. Theorem 5.1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 39-41. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩) → (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩ ∨ 𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩)))
Theorem	btwnconn2 36560	Another connectivity law for betweenness. Theorem 5.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 41. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩) → (𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐵, 𝐷⟩ ∨ 𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩)))
Theorem	btwnconn3 36561	Inner connectivity law for betweenness. Theorem 5.3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 41. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩ ∧ 𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩) → (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∨ 𝐶 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)))
Theorem	midofsegid 36562	If two points fall in the same place in the middle of a segment, then they are identical. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝐷 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∧ 𝐸 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐴, 𝐸⟩) → 𝐷 = 𝐸))
Theorem	segcon2 36563*	Generalization of axsegcon 29243. This time, we generate an endpoint for a segment on the ray 𝑄𝐴 congruent to 𝐵𝐶 and starting at 𝑄, as opposed to axsegcon 29243, where the segment starts at 𝐴 (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Oct-2013.) Remove unneeded inequality. (Revised by Scott Fenton, 15-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝑄 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)((𝐴 Btwn ⟨𝑄, 𝑥⟩ ∨ 𝑥 Btwn ⟨𝑄, 𝐴⟩) ∧ ⟨𝑄, 𝑥⟩Cgr⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩))
21.11.17.6  Segment less than or equal to
Syntax	csegle 36564	Declare the constant for the segment less than or equal to relationship.
class Seg≤
Definition	df-segle 36565*	Define the segment length comparison relationship. This relationship expresses that the segment 𝐴𝐵 is no longer than 𝐶𝐷. In this section, we establish various properties of this relationship showing that it is a transitive, reflexive relationship on pairs of points that is substitutive under congruence. Definition 5.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 41. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Oct-2013.)
⊢ Seg≤ = {⟨𝑝, 𝑞⟩ ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ∃𝑎 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)∃𝑑 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)(𝑝 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∧ 𝑞 = ⟨𝑐, 𝑑⟩ ∧ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛)(𝑦 Btwn ⟨𝑐, 𝑑⟩ ∧ ⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩Cgr⟨𝑐, 𝑦⟩))}
Theorem	brsegle 36566*	Binary relation form of the segment comparison relationship. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)(𝑦 Btwn ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝑦⟩)))
Theorem	brsegle2 36567*	Alternate characterization of segment comparison. Theorem 5.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 41-42. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)(𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑥⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝑥⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩)))
Theorem	seglecgr12im 36568	Substitution law for segment comparison under congruence. Theorem 5.6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 42. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Oct-2013.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩) → ⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩))
Theorem	seglecgr12 36569	Substitution law for segment comparison under congruence. Biconditional version. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐻 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩Cgr⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ↔ ⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝐺, 𝐻⟩)))
Theorem	seglerflx 36570	Segment comparison is reflexive. Theorem 5.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 42. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)
Theorem	seglemin 36571	Any segment is at least as long as a degenerate segment. Theorem 5.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 42. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ⟨𝐴, 𝐴⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩)
Theorem	segletr 36572	Segment less than is transitive. Theorem 5.8 of [Schwabhauser] p. 42. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩) → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩))
Theorem	segleantisym 36573	Antisymmetry law for segment comparison. Theorem 5.9 of [Schwabhauser] p. 42. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩) → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩Cgr⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩))
Theorem	seglelin 36574	Linearity law for segment comparison. Theorem 5.10 of [Schwabhauser] p. 42. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Oct-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ∨ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩))
Theorem	btwnsegle 36575	If 𝐵 falls between 𝐴 and 𝐶, then 𝐴𝐵 is no longer than 𝐴𝐶. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩))
Theorem	colinbtwnle 36576	Given three colinear points 𝐴, 𝐵, and 𝐶, 𝐵 falls in the middle iff the two segments to 𝐵 are no longer than 𝐴𝐶. Theorem 5.12 of [Schwabhauser] p. 42. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝐴 Colinear ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ → (𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ↔ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩))))
21.11.17.7  Outside-of relationship
Syntax	coutsideof 36577	Declare the syntax for the outside of constant.
class OutsideOf
Definition	df-outsideof 36578	The outside of relationship. This relationship expresses that 𝑃, 𝐴, and 𝐵 fall on a line, but 𝑃 is not on the segment 𝐴𝐵. This definition is taken from theorem 6.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 43, since it requires no dummy variables. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Oct-2013.)
⊢ OutsideOf = ( Colinear ∖ Btwn )
Theorem	broutsideof 36579	Binary relation form of OutsideOf. Theorem 6.4 of [Schwabhauser] p. 43. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (𝑃OutsideOf⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ↔ (𝑃 Colinear ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∧ ¬ 𝑃 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩))
Theorem	broutsideof2 36580	Alternate form of OutsideOf. Definition 6.1 of [Schwabhauser] p. 43. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 17-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝑃OutsideOf⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ↔ (𝐴 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ (𝐴 Btwn ⟨𝑃, 𝐵⟩ ∨ 𝐵 Btwn ⟨𝑃, 𝐴⟩))))
Theorem	outsidene1 36581	Outsideness implies inequality. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝑃OutsideOf⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ → 𝐴 ≠ 𝑃))
Theorem	outsidene2 36582	Outsideness implies inequality. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝑃OutsideOf⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ → 𝐵 ≠ 𝑃))
Theorem	btwnoutside 36583	A principle linking outsideness to betweenness. Theorem 6.2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 43. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (((𝐴 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝐶 ≠ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑃 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩) → (𝑃 Btwn ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ 𝑃OutsideOf⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)))
Theorem	broutsideof3 36584*	Characterization of outsideness in terms of relationship to a fourth point. Theorem 6.3 of [Schwabhauser] p. 43. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝑃OutsideOf⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ↔ (𝐴 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ∃𝑐 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)(𝑐 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑃 Btwn ⟨𝐴, 𝑐⟩ ∧ 𝑃 Btwn ⟨𝐵, 𝑐⟩))))
Theorem	outsideofrflx 36585	Reflexivity of outsideness. Theorem 6.5 of [Schwabhauser] p. 44. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) → (𝐴 ≠ 𝑃 → 𝑃OutsideOf⟨𝐴, 𝐴⟩))
Theorem	outsideofcom 36586	Commutativity law for outsideness. Theorem 6.6 of [Schwabhauser] p. 44. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝑃OutsideOf⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ↔ 𝑃OutsideOf⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩))
Theorem	outsideoftr 36587	Transitivity law for outsideness. Theorem 6.7 of [Schwabhauser] p. 44. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝑃OutsideOf⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∧ 𝑃OutsideOf⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩) → 𝑃OutsideOf⟨𝐴, 𝐶⟩))
Theorem	outsideofeq 36588	Uniqueness law for OutsideOf. Analogue of segconeq 36468. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑌 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (((𝐴OutsideOf⟨𝑋, 𝑅⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝑋⟩Cgr⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩) ∧ (𝐴OutsideOf⟨𝑌, 𝑅⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝑌⟩Cgr⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩)) → 𝑋 = 𝑌))
Theorem	outsideofeu 36589*	Given a nondegenerate ray, there is a unique point congruent to the segment 𝐵𝐶 lying on the ray 𝐴𝑅. Theorem 6.11 of [Schwabhauser] p. 44. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → ((𝑅 ≠ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁)(𝐴OutsideOf⟨𝑥, 𝑅⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐴, 𝑥⟩Cgr⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩)))
Theorem	outsidele 36590	Relate OutsideOf to Seg≤. Theorem 6.13 of [Schwabhauser] p. 45. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁))) → (𝑃OutsideOf⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ → (⟨𝑃, 𝐴⟩ Seg≤ ⟨𝑃, 𝐵⟩ ↔ 𝐴 Btwn ⟨𝑃, 𝐵⟩)))
Theorem	outsideofcol 36591	Outside of implies colinearity. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 26-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ (𝑃OutsideOf⟨𝑄, 𝑅⟩ → 𝑃 Colinear ⟨𝑄, 𝑅⟩)
21.11.17.8  Lines and Rays
Syntax	cline2 36592	Declare the constant for the line function.
class Line
Syntax	cray 36593	Declare the constant for the ray function.
class Ray
Syntax	clines2 36594	Declare the constant for the set of all lines.
class LinesEE
Definition	df-line2 36595*	Define the Line function. This function generates the line passing through the distinct points 𝑎 and 𝑏. Adapted from definition 6.14 of [Schwabhauser] p. 45. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Oct-2013.)
⊢ Line = {⟨⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩, 𝑙⟩ ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ((𝑎 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ∧ 𝑎 ≠ 𝑏) ∧ 𝑙 = [⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩]◡ Colinear )}
Definition	df-ray 36596*	Define the Ray function. This function generates the set of all points that lie on the ray starting at 𝑝 and passing through 𝑎. Definition 6.8 of [Schwabhauser] p. 44. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Oct-2013.)
⊢ Ray = {⟨⟨𝑝, 𝑎⟩, 𝑟⟩ ∣ ∃𝑛 ∈ ℕ ((𝑝 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ∧ 𝑎 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑎) ∧ 𝑟 = {𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑛) ∣ 𝑝OutsideOf⟨𝑎, 𝑥⟩})}
Definition	df-lines2 36597	Define the set of all lines. Definition 6.14, part 2 of [Schwabhauser] p. 45. See ellines 36610 for membership. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 28-Oct-2013.)
⊢ LinesEE = ran Line
Theorem	funray 36598	Show that the Ray relationship is a function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ Fun Ray
Theorem	fvray 36599*	Calculate the value of the Ray function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 21-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ (𝑃 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝐴)) → (𝑃Ray𝐴) = {𝑥 ∈ (𝔼‘𝑁) ∣ 𝑃OutsideOf⟨𝐴, 𝑥⟩})
Theorem	funline 36600	Show that the Line relationship is a function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Oct-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Apr-2014.)
⊢ Fun Line