P. 366 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 36501-36600   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	dm1cosscnvepres 36501	The domain of cosets of the restricted converse epsilon relation is the union of the restriction. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-May-2019.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 26-Sep-2021.)
⊢ dom ≀ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) = ∪ 𝐴
Theorem	dmcoels 36502	The domain of coelements in 𝐴 is the union of 𝐴. (Contributed by Rodolfo Medina, 14-Oct-2010.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 5-Apr-2018.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 26-Sep-2021.)
⊢ dom ∼ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝐴
Theorem	eldmcoss 36503*	Elementhood in the domain of cosets. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 29-Mar-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ dom ≀ 𝑅 ↔ ∃𝑢 𝑢𝑅𝐴))
Theorem	eldmcoss2 36504	Elementhood in the domain of cosets. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ dom ≀ 𝑅 ↔ 𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐴))
Theorem	eldm1cossres 36505*	Elementhood in the domain of restricted cosets. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ dom ≀ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢𝑅𝐵))
Theorem	eldm1cossres2 36506*	Elementhood in the domain of restricted cosets. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ dom ≀ (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ [𝑥]𝑅))
Theorem	refrelcosslem 36507	Lemma for the left side of the refrelcoss3 36508 reflexivity theorem. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Apr-2019.)
⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom ≀ 𝑅𝑥 ≀ 𝑅𝑥
Theorem	refrelcoss3 36508*	The class of cosets by 𝑅 is reflexive, see dfrefrel3 36561. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ dom ≀ 𝑅∀𝑦 ∈ ran ≀ 𝑅(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥 ≀ 𝑅𝑦) ∧ Rel ≀ 𝑅)
Theorem	refrelcoss2 36509	The class of cosets by 𝑅 is reflexive, see dfrefrel2 36560. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (( I ∩ (dom ≀ 𝑅 × ran ≀ 𝑅)) ⊆ ≀ 𝑅 ∧ Rel ≀ 𝑅)
Theorem	symrelcoss3 36510	The class of cosets by 𝑅 is symmetric, see dfsymrel3 36591. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Mar-2019.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 17-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥 ≀ 𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦 ≀ 𝑅𝑥) ∧ Rel ≀ 𝑅)
Theorem	symrelcoss2 36511	The class of cosets by 𝑅 is symmetric, see dfsymrel2 36590. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (◡ ≀ 𝑅 ⊆ ≀ 𝑅 ∧ Rel ≀ 𝑅)
Theorem	cossssid 36512	Equivalent expressions for the class of cosets by 𝑅 to be a subset of the identity class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ( ≀ 𝑅 ⊆ I ↔ ≀ 𝑅 ⊆ ( I ∩ (dom ≀ 𝑅 × ran ≀ 𝑅)))
Theorem	cossssid2 36513*	Equivalent expressions for the class of cosets by 𝑅 to be a subset of the identity class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-Mar-2019.)
⊢ ( ≀ 𝑅 ⊆ I ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(∃𝑢(𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑦) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	cossssid3 36514*	Equivalent expressions for the class of cosets by 𝑅 to be a subset of the identity class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-Mar-2019.)
⊢ ( ≀ 𝑅 ⊆ I ↔ ∀𝑢∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑦) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))
Theorem	cossssid4 36515*	Equivalent expressions for the class of cosets by 𝑅 to be a subset of the identity class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ( ≀ 𝑅 ⊆ I ↔ ∀𝑢∃*𝑥 𝑢𝑅𝑥)
Theorem	cossssid5 36516*	Equivalent expressions for the class of cosets by 𝑅 to be a subset of the identity class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( ≀ 𝑅 ⊆ I ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ran 𝑅∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑅(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ ([𝑥]◡𝑅 ∩ [𝑦]◡𝑅) = ∅))
Theorem	brcosscnv 36517*	𝐴 and 𝐵 are cosets by converse 𝑅: a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Jan-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≀ ◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑥)))
Theorem	brcosscnv2 36518	𝐴 and 𝐵 are cosets by converse 𝑅: a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Mar-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≀ ◡𝑅𝐵 ↔ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) ≠ ∅))
Theorem	br1cosscnvxrn 36519	𝐴 and 𝐵 are cosets by the converse range Cartesian product: a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Apr-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 21-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ≀ ◡(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ≀ ◡𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≀ ◡𝑆𝐵)))
Theorem	1cosscnvxrn 36520	Cosets by the converse range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Apr-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 21-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ≀ ◡(𝐴 ⋉ 𝐵) = ( ≀ ◡𝐴 ∩ ≀ ◡𝐵)
Theorem	cosscnvssid3 36521*	Equivalent expressions for the class of cosets by the converse of 𝑅 to be a subset of the identity class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ( ≀ ◡𝑅 ⊆ I ↔ ∀𝑢∀𝑣∀𝑥((𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑣𝑅𝑥) → 𝑢 = 𝑣))
Theorem	cosscnvssid4 36522*	Equivalent expressions for the class of cosets by the converse of 𝑅 to be a subset of the identity class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ( ≀ ◡𝑅 ⊆ I ↔ ∀𝑥∃*𝑢 𝑢𝑅𝑥)
Theorem	cosscnvssid5 36523*	Equivalent expressions for the class of cosets by the converse of the relation 𝑅 to be a subset of the identity class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (( ≀ ◡𝑅 ⊆ I ∧ Rel 𝑅) ↔ (∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) = ∅) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	coss0 36524	Cosets by the empty set are the empty set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Oct-2019.)
⊢ ≀ ∅ = ∅
Theorem	cossid 36525	Cosets by the identity relation are the identity relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Jan-2019.)
⊢ ≀ I = I
Theorem	cosscnvid 36526	Cosets by the converse identity relation are the identity relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ≀ ◡ I = I
Theorem	trcoss 36527*	Sufficient condition for the transitivity of cosets by 𝑅. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 26-Dec-2018.)
⊢ (∀𝑦∃*𝑢 𝑢𝑅𝑦 → ∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥 ≀ 𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≀ 𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥 ≀ 𝑅𝑧))
Theorem	eleccossin 36528	Two ways of saying that the coset of 𝐴 and the coset of 𝐶 have the common element 𝐵. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 15-Oct-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐵 ∈ ([𝐴] ≀ 𝑅 ∩ [𝐶] ≀ 𝑅) ↔ (𝐴 ≀ 𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≀ 𝑅𝐶)))
Theorem	trcoss2 36529*	Equivalent expressions for the transitivity of cosets by 𝑅. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 4-Jul-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 16-Oct-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦∀𝑧((𝑥 ≀ 𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≀ 𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥 ≀ 𝑅𝑧) ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑧(([𝑥] ≀ 𝑅 ∩ [𝑧] ≀ 𝑅) ≠ ∅ → ([𝑥]◡𝑅 ∩ [𝑧]◡𝑅) ≠ ∅))
20.22.5  Relations
Definition	df-rels 36530	Define the relations class. Proper class relations (like I, see reli 5725) are not elements of it. The element of this class and the relation predicate are the same when 𝑅 is a set (see elrelsrel 36532). The class of relations is a great tool we can use when we define classes of different relations as nullary class constants as required by the 2. point in our Guidelines https://us.metamath.org/mpeuni/mathbox.html 36532. When we want to define a specific class of relations as a nullary class constant, the appropriate method is the following: 1. We define the specific nullary class constant for general sets (see e.g. df-refs 36555), then 2. we get the required class of relations by the intersection of the class of general sets above with the class of relations df-rels 36530 (see df-refrels 36556 and the resulting dfrefrels2 36558 and dfrefrels3 36559). 3. Finally, in order to be able to work with proper classes (like iprc 7734) as well, we define the predicate of the relation (see df-refrel 36557) so that it is true for the relevant proper classes (see refrelid 36566), and that the element of the class of the required relations (e.g. elrefrels3 36563) and this predicate are the same in case of sets (see elrefrelsrel 36564). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 13-Jun-2018.)
⊢ Rels = 𝒫 (V × V)
Theorem	elrels2 36531	The element of the relations class (df-rels 36530) and the relation predicate (df-rel 5587) are the same when 𝑅 is a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 14-Jun-2018.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 ∈ Rels ↔ 𝑅 ⊆ (V × V)))
Theorem	elrelsrel 36532	The element of the relations class (df-rels 36530) and the relation predicate are the same when 𝑅 is a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Nov-2018.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 ∈ Rels ↔ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	elrelsrelim 36533	The element of the relations class is a relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Rels → Rel 𝑅)
Theorem	elrels5 36534	Equivalent expressions for an element of the relations class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 21-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 ∈ Rels ↔ (𝑅 ↾ dom 𝑅) = 𝑅))
Theorem	elrels6 36535	Equivalent expressions for an element of the relations class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 21-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 ∈ Rels ↔ (𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) = 𝑅))
Theorem	elrelscnveq3 36536*	Two ways of saying a relation is symmetric. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Rels → (𝑅 = ◡𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦𝑅𝑥)))
Theorem	elrelscnveq 36537	Two ways of saying a relation is symmetric. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Rels → (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ◡𝑅 = 𝑅))
Theorem	elrelscnveq2 36538*	Two ways of saying a relation is symmetric. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Rels → (◡𝑅 = 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)))
Theorem	elrelscnveq4 36539*	Two ways of saying a relation is symmetric. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Rels → (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)))
Theorem	cnvelrels 36540	The converse of a set is an element of the class of relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Aug-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ◡𝐴 ∈ Rels )
Theorem	cosselrels 36541	Cosets of sets are elements of the relations class. Implies ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Rels → ≀ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ≀ 𝐴 ∈ Rels )
Theorem	cosscnvelrels 36542	Cosets of converse sets are elements of the relations class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ≀ ◡𝐴 ∈ Rels )
20.22.6  Subset relations
Definition	df-ssr 36543*	Define the subsets class or the class of subset relations. Similar to definitions of epsilon relation (df-eprel 5486) and identity relation (df-id 5480) classes. Subset relation class and Scott Fenton's subset class df-sset 34085 are the same: S = SSet (compare dfssr2 36544 with df-sset 34085), the only reason we do not use dfssr2 36544 as the base definition of the subsets class is the way we defined the epsilon relation and the identity relation classes. The binary relation on the class of subsets and the subclass relationship (df-ss 3900) are the same, that is, (𝐴 S 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) when 𝐵 is a set, see brssr 36546. Yet in general we use the subclass relation 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 both for classes and for sets, see the comment of df-ss 3900. The only exception (aside from directly investigating the class S e.g. in relssr 36545 or in extssr 36554) is when we have a specific purpose with its usage, like in case of df-refs 36555 versus df-cnvrefs 36568, where we need S to define the class of reflexive sets in order to be able to define the class of converse reflexive sets with the help of the converse of S. The subsets class S has another place in set.mm as well: if we define extensional relation based on the common property in extid 36373, extep 36345 and extssr 36554, then "extrelssr" " |- ExtRel S " is a theorem along with "extrelep" " |- ExtRel E " and "extrelid" " |- ExtRel I " . (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jul-2019.)
⊢ S = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦}
Theorem	dfssr2 36544	Alternate definition of the subset relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Aug-2021.)
⊢ S = ((V × V) ∖ ran ( E ⋉ (V ∖ E )))
Theorem	relssr 36545	The subset relation is a relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Aug-2019.)
⊢ Rel S
Theorem	brssr 36546	The subset relation and subclass relationship (df-ss 3900) are the same, that is, (𝐴 S 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) when 𝐵 is a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 S 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	brssrid 36547	Any set is a subset of itself. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Aug-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 S 𝐴)
Theorem	issetssr 36548	Two ways of expressing set existence. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Aug-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ 𝐴 S 𝐴)
Theorem	brssrres 36549	Restricted subset binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵( S ↾ 𝐴)𝐶 ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶)))
Theorem	br1cnvssrres 36550	Restricted converse subset binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Nov-2019.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵◡( S ↾ 𝐴)𝐶 ↔ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵)))
Theorem	brcnvssr 36551	The converse of a subset relation swaps arguments. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Aug-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴◡ S 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴))
Theorem	brcnvssrid 36552	Any set is a converse subset of itself. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴◡ S 𝐴)
Theorem	br1cossxrncnvssrres 36553*	⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ and ⟨𝐷, 𝐸⟩ are cosets by range Cartesian product with restricted converse subsets class: a binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊) ∧ (𝐷 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝑌)) → (⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ≀ (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ S ↾ 𝐴))⟨𝐷, 𝐸⟩ ↔ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐶 ⊆ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐵) ∧ (𝐸 ⊆ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝐷))))
Theorem	extssr 36554	Property of subset relation, see also extid 36373, extep 36345 and the comment of df-ssr 36543. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ([𝐴]◡ S = [𝐵]◡ S ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
20.22.7  Reflexivity
Definition	df-refs 36555	Define the class of all reflexive sets. It is used only by df-refrels 36556. We use subset relation S (df-ssr 36543) here to be able to define converse reflexivity (df-cnvrefs 36568), see also the comment of df-ssr 36543. The elements of this class are not necessarily relations (versus df-refrels 36556). Note the similarity of Definitions df-refs 36555, df-syms 36583 and df-trs 36613, cf. comments of dfrefrels2 36558. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Jul-2019.)
⊢ Refs = {𝑥 ∣ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑥 × ran 𝑥)) S (𝑥 ∩ (dom 𝑥 × ran 𝑥))}
Definition	df-refrels 36556	Define the class of reflexive relations. This is practically dfrefrels2 36558 (which reveals that RefRels can not include proper classes like I as is elements, see comments of dfrefrels2 36558). Another alternative definition is dfrefrels3 36559. The element of this class and the reflexive relation predicate (df-refrel 36557) are the same, that is, (𝑅 ∈ RefRels ↔ RefRel 𝑅) when 𝐴 is a set, see elrefrelsrel 36564. This definition is similar to the definitions of the classes of symmetric (df-symrels 36584) and transitive (df-trrels 36614) relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 7-Jul-2019.)
⊢ RefRels = ( Refs ∩ Rels )
Definition	df-refrel 36557	Define the reflexive relation predicate. (Read: 𝑅 is a reflexive relation.) This is a surprising definition, see the comment of dfrefrel3 36561. Alternate definitions are dfrefrel2 36560 and dfrefrel3 36561. For sets, being an element of the class of reflexive relations (df-refrels 36556) is equivalent to satisfying the reflexive relation predicate, that is (𝑅 ∈ RefRels ↔ RefRel 𝑅) when 𝑅 is a set, see elrefrelsrel 36564. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ( RefRel 𝑅 ↔ (( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfrefrels2 36558	Alternate definition of the class of reflexive relations. This is a 0-ary class constant, which is recommended for definitions (see the 1. Guideline at https://us.metamath.org/ileuni/mathbox.html). Proper classes (like I, see iprc 7734) are not elements of this (or any) class: if a class is an element of another class, it is not a proper class but a set, see elex 3440. So if we use 0-ary constant classes as our main definitions, they are valid only for sets, not for proper classes. For proper classes we use predicate-type definitions like df-refrel 36557. See also the comment of df-rels 36530. Note that while elementhood in the class of relations cancels restriction of 𝑟 in dfrefrels2 36558, it keeps restriction of I: this is why the very similar definitions df-refs 36555, df-syms 36583 and df-trs 36613 diverge when we switch from (general) sets to relations in dfrefrels2 36558, dfsymrels2 36586 and dftrrels2 36616. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Jul-2019.)
⊢ RefRels = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟)) ⊆ 𝑟}
Theorem	dfrefrels3 36559*	Alternate definition of the class of reflexive relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Jul-2019.)
⊢ RefRels = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑟∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑟(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑟𝑦)}
Theorem	dfrefrel2 36560	Alternate definition of the reflexive relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ( RefRel 𝑅 ↔ (( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfrefrel3 36561*	Alternate definition of the reflexive relation predicate. A relation is reflexive iff: for all elements on its domain and range, if an element of its domain is the same as an element of its range, then there is the relation between them. Note that this is definitely not the definition we are accustomed to, like e.g. idref 7000 / idrefALT 6007 or df-reflexive 46356 ⊢ (𝑅Reflexive𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 ⊆ (𝐴 × 𝐴) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝑥𝑅𝑥)). It turns out that the not-surprising definition which contains ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑟𝑥𝑟𝑥 needs symmetry as well, see refsymrels3 36607. Only when this symmetry condition holds, like in case of equivalence relations, see dfeqvrels3 36629, can we write the traditional form ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑟𝑥𝑟𝑥 for reflexive relations. For the special case with square Cartesian product when the two forms are equivalent see idinxpssinxp4 36382 where ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴𝑥𝑅𝑥). See also similar definition of the converse reflexive relations class dfcnvrefrel3 36574. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ( RefRel 𝑅 ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑅(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	elrefrels2 36562	Element of the class of reflexive relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RefRels ↔ (( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	elrefrels3 36563*	Element of the class of reflexive relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ RefRels ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑅(𝑥 = 𝑦 → 𝑥𝑅𝑦) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	elrefrelsrel 36564	For sets, being an element of the class of reflexive relations (df-refrels 36556) is equivalent to satisfying the reflexive relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 ∈ RefRels ↔ RefRel 𝑅))
Theorem	refreleq 36565	Equality theorem for reflexive relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 15-Apr-2019.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 23-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → ( RefRel 𝑅 ↔ RefRel 𝑆))
Theorem	refrelid 36566	Identity relation is reflexive. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jul-2021.)
⊢ RefRel I
Theorem	refrelcoss 36567	The class of cosets by 𝑅 is reflexive. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 4-Jul-2020.)
⊢ RefRel ≀ 𝑅
20.22.8  Converse reflexivity
Definition	df-cnvrefs 36568	Define the class of all converse reflexive sets, see the comment of df-ssr 36543. It is used only by df-cnvrefrels 36569. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Jul-2019.)
⊢ CnvRefs = {𝑥 ∣ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑥 × ran 𝑥))◡ S (𝑥 ∩ (dom 𝑥 × ran 𝑥))}
Definition	df-cnvrefrels 36569	Define the class of converse reflexive relations. This is practically dfcnvrefrels2 36571 (which uses the traditional subclass relation ⊆) : we use converse subset relation (brcnvssr 36551) here to ensure the comparability to the definitions of the classes of all reflexive (df-ref 22564), symmetric (df-syms 36583) and transitive (df-trs 36613) sets. We use this concept to define functions (df-funsALTV 36719, df-funALTV 36720) and disjoints (df-disjs 36742, df-disjALTV 36743). For sets, being an element of the class of converse reflexive relations is equivalent to satisfying the converse reflexive relation predicate, see elcnvrefrelsrel 36577. Alternate definitions are dfcnvrefrels2 36571 and dfcnvrefrels3 36572. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 7-Jul-2019.)
⊢ CnvRefRels = ( CnvRefs ∩ Rels )
Definition	df-cnvrefrel 36570	Define the converse reflexive relation predicate (read: 𝑅 is a converse reflexive relation), see also the comment of dfcnvrefrel3 36574. Alternate definitions are dfcnvrefrel2 36573 and dfcnvrefrel3 36574. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ( CnvRefRel 𝑅 ↔ ((𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfcnvrefrels2 36571	Alternate definition of the class of converse reflexive relations. See the comment of dfrefrels2 36558. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 21-Jul-2021.)
⊢ CnvRefRels = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ 𝑟 ⊆ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑟 × ran 𝑟))}
Theorem	dfcnvrefrels3 36572*	Alternate definition of the class of converse reflexive relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Jul-2019.)
⊢ CnvRefRels = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑟∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑟(𝑥𝑟𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦)}
Theorem	dfcnvrefrel2 36573	Alternate definition of the converse reflexive relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jul-2019.)
⊢ ( CnvRefRel 𝑅 ↔ (𝑅 ⊆ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfcnvrefrel3 36574*	Alternate definition of the converse reflexive relation predicate. A relation is converse reflexive iff: for all elements on its domain and range, if for an element of its domain and for an element of its range there is the relation between them, then the two elements are the same, cf. the comment of dfrefrel3 36561. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ( CnvRefRel 𝑅 ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑅(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	elcnvrefrels2 36575	Element of the class of converse reflexive relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ CnvRefRels ↔ (𝑅 ⊆ ( I ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	elcnvrefrels3 36576*	Element of the class of converse reflexive relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ CnvRefRels ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑅(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	elcnvrefrelsrel 36577	For sets, being an element of the class of converse reflexive relations (df-cnvrefrels 36569) is equivalent to satisfying the converse reflexive relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 ∈ CnvRefRels ↔ CnvRefRel 𝑅))
Theorem	cnvrefrelcoss2 36578	Necessary and sufficient condition for a coset relation to be a converse reflexive relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ( CnvRefRel ≀ 𝑅 ↔ ≀ 𝑅 ⊆ I )
Theorem	cosselcnvrefrels2 36579	Necessary and sufficient condition for a coset relation to be an element of the converse reflexive relation class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ( ≀ 𝑅 ∈ CnvRefRels ↔ ( ≀ 𝑅 ⊆ I ∧ ≀ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	cosselcnvrefrels3 36580*	Necessary and sufficient condition for a coset relation to be an element of the converse reflexive relation class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ( ≀ 𝑅 ∈ CnvRefRels ↔ (∀𝑢∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑦) → 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ ≀ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	cosselcnvrefrels4 36581*	Necessary and sufficient condition for a coset relation to be an element of the converse reflexive relation class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ( ≀ 𝑅 ∈ CnvRefRels ↔ (∀𝑢∃*𝑥 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ ≀ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	cosselcnvrefrels5 36582*	Necessary and sufficient condition for a coset relation to be an element of the converse reflexive relation class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ( ≀ 𝑅 ∈ CnvRefRels ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ ran 𝑅∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝑅(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ ([𝑥]◡𝑅 ∩ [𝑦]◡𝑅) = ∅) ∧ ≀ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ))
20.22.9  Symmetry
Definition	df-syms 36583	Define the class of all symmetric sets. It is used only by df-symrels 36584. Note the similarity of Definitions df-refs 36555, df-syms 36583 and df-trs 36613, cf. the comment of dfrefrels2 36558. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Jul-2019.)
⊢ Syms = {𝑥 ∣ ◡(𝑥 ∩ (dom 𝑥 × ran 𝑥)) S (𝑥 ∩ (dom 𝑥 × ran 𝑥))}
Definition	df-symrels 36584	Define the class of symmetric relations. For sets, being an element of the class of symmetric relations is equivalent to satisfying the symmetric relation predicate, see elsymrelsrel 36598. Alternate definitions are dfsymrels2 36586, dfsymrels3 36587, dfsymrels4 36588 and dfsymrels5 36589. This definition is similar to the definitions of the classes of reflexive (df-refrels 36556) and transitive (df-trrels 36614) relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 7-Jul-2019.)
⊢ SymRels = ( Syms ∩ Rels )
Definition	df-symrel 36585	Define the symmetric relation predicate. (Read: 𝑅 is a symmetric relation.) For sets, being an element of the class of symmetric relations (df-symrels 36584) is equivalent to satisfying the symmetric relation predicate, see elsymrelsrel 36598. Alternate definitions are dfsymrel2 36590 and dfsymrel3 36591. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Jul-2021.)
⊢ ( SymRel 𝑅 ↔ (◡(𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ⊆ (𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfsymrels2 36586	Alternate definition of the class of symmetric relations. Cf. the comment of dfrefrels2 36558. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Jul-2019.)
⊢ SymRels = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ◡𝑟 ⊆ 𝑟}
Theorem	dfsymrels3 36587*	Alternate definition of the class of symmetric relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Jul-2021.)
⊢ SymRels = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑟𝑦 → 𝑦𝑟𝑥)}
Theorem	dfsymrels4 36588	Alternate definition of the class of symmetric relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Jul-2019.)
⊢ SymRels = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ◡𝑟 = 𝑟}
Theorem	dfsymrels5 36589*	Alternate definition of the class of symmetric relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Jul-2021.)
⊢ SymRels = {𝑟 ∈ Rels ∣ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑟𝑦 ↔ 𝑦𝑟𝑥)}
Theorem	dfsymrel2 36590	Alternate definition of the symmetric relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Apr-2019.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 17-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ( SymRel 𝑅 ↔ (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfsymrel3 36591*	Alternate definition of the symmetric relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 21-Apr-2019.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 17-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ( SymRel 𝑅 ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦𝑅𝑥) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfsymrel4 36592	Alternate definition of the symmetric relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ( SymRel 𝑅 ↔ (◡𝑅 = 𝑅 ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	dfsymrel5 36593*	Alternate definition of the symmetric relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ( SymRel 𝑅 ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	elsymrels2 36594	Element of the class of symmetric relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ SymRels ↔ (◡𝑅 ⊆ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	elsymrels3 36595*	Element of the class of symmetric relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ SymRels ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 → 𝑦𝑅𝑥) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	elsymrels4 36596	Element of the class of symmetric relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ SymRels ↔ (◡𝑅 = 𝑅 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	elsymrels5 36597*	Element of the class of symmetric relations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ SymRels ↔ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑦𝑅𝑥) ∧ 𝑅 ∈ Rels ))
Theorem	elsymrelsrel 36598	For sets, being an element of the class of symmetric relations (df-symrels 36584) is equivalent to satisfying the symmetric relation predicate. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 17-Aug-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 ∈ SymRels ↔ SymRel 𝑅))
Theorem	symreleq 36599	Equality theorem for symmetric relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 15-Apr-2019.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 23-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → ( SymRel 𝑅 ↔ SymRel 𝑆))
Theorem	symrelim 36600	Symmetric relation implies that the domain and the range are equal. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 29-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ( SymRel 𝑅 → dom 𝑅 = ran 𝑅)