Theorem ud2 596

Description: Unified disjunction for Dishkant implication. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-1997.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ud2	(a ∪ b) = ((a →2 b) →2 (((a →2 b) →2 (b →2 a)) →2 a))

Proof of Theorem ud2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ud2lem1 563	. . . . . 6 ((a →2 b) →2 (b →2 a)) = (a ∪ (a⊥ ∩ b⊥ ))
2	1	ud2lem0b 259	. . . . 5 (((a →2 b) →2 (b →2 a)) →2 a) = ((a ∪ (a⊥ ∩ b⊥ )) →2 a)
3		ud2lem2 564	. . . . 5 ((a ∪ (a⊥ ∩ b⊥ )) →2 a) = (a ∪ b)
4	2, 3	ax-r2 36	. . . 4 (((a →2 b) →2 (b →2 a)) →2 a) = (a ∪ b)
5	4	ud2lem0a 258	. . 3 ((a →2 b) →2 (((a →2 b) →2 (b →2 a)) →2 a)) = ((a →2 b) →2 (a ∪ b))
6		ud2lem3 565	. . 3 ((a →2 b) →2 (a ∪ b)) = (a ∪ b)
7	5, 6	ax-r2 36	. 2 ((a →2 b) →2 (((a →2 b) →2 (b →2 a)) →2 a)) = (a ∪ b)
8	7	ax-r1 35	1 (a ∪ b) = ((a →2 b) →2 (((a →2 b) →2 (b →2 a)) →2 a))

Syntax hints:   = wb 1  ^⊥ wn 4   ∪ wo 6   ∩ wa 7   →₂ wi2 13

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-a1 30  ax-a2 31  ax-a3 32  ax-a4 33  ax-a5 34  ax-r1 35  ax-r2 36  ax-r4 37  ax-r5 38  ax-r3 439

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-b 39  df-a 40  df-t 41  df-f 42  df-i2 45  df-le1 130  df-le2 131  df-c1 132  df-c2 133

This theorem is referenced by: (None)