Theorem bj-idreseq 34457

Description: Sufficient condition for the restricted identity relation to agree with equality. Note that the instance of bj-ideqg 34452 with V substituted for 𝑉 is a direct consequence of bj-idreseq 34457. This is a strengthening of resieq 5864 which should be proved from it (note that currently, resieq 5864 relies on ideq 5723). Note that the intersection in the antecedent is not very meaningful, but is a device to prove versions with either class assumed to be a set. It could be enough to prove the version with a disjunctive antecedent: ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → .... (Contributed by BJ, 25-Dec-2023.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-idreseq	⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴( I ↾ 𝐶)𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem bj-idreseq

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bj-brresdm 34441	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴( I ↾ 𝐶)𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)
2		relres 5882	. . . . 5 ⊢ Rel ( I ↾ 𝐶)
3	2	brrelex2i 5609	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴( I ↾ 𝐶)𝐵 → 𝐵 ∈ V)
4	1, 3	jca 514	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴( I ↾ 𝐶)𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
5	4	adantl 484	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴( I ↾ 𝐶)𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
6		eqimss 4023	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)
7		df-ss 3952	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐴)
8	6, 7	sylib 220	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐴)
9	8	adantl 484	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐴)
10		simpl 485	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶)
11	9, 10	eqeltrrd 2914	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)
12		eqimss2 4024	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)
13		sseqin2 4192	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐵)
14	12, 13	sylib 220	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐵)
15	14	adantl 484	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = 𝐵)
16	15, 10	eqeltrrd 2914	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶)
17	16	elexd 3514	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ V)
18	11, 17	jca 514	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
19		brres 5860	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ V → (𝐴( I ↾ 𝐶)𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 I 𝐵)))
20	19	adantl 484	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝐴( I ↾ 𝐶)𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 I 𝐵)))
21		eqeq12 2835	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝑥 = 𝑦 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
22		df-id 5460	. . . . 5 ⊢ I = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥 = 𝑦}
23	21, 22	brabga 5421	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝐴 I 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
24	23	anbi2d 630	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 I 𝐵) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
25		simp3 1134	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐵)
26	25	3expib 1118	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐵))
27		3simpb 1145	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
28	27	3expia 1117	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵)))
29	26, 28	impbid 214	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
30	20, 24, 29	3bitrd 307	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → (𝐴( I ↾ 𝐶)𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
31	5, 18, 30	pm5.21nd 800	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴( I ↾ 𝐶)𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2114  Vcvv 3494   ∩ cin 3935   ⊆ wss 3936   class class class wbr 5066   I cid 5459   ↾ cres 5557

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2145  ax-11 2161  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2793  ax-sep 5203  ax-nul 5210  ax-pr 5330

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1540  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2070  df-mo 2622  df-eu 2654  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-nfc 2963  df-ral 3143  df-rex 3144  df-rab 3147  df-v 3496  df-dif 3939  df-un 3941  df-in 3943  df-ss 3952  df-nul 4292  df-if 4468  df-sn 4568  df-pr 4570  df-op 4574  df-br 5067  df-opab 5129  df-id 5460  df-xp 5561  df-rel 5562  df-res 5567

This theorem is referenced by: (None)