Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > indislem | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: A lemma to eliminate some sethood hypotheses when dealing with the indiscrete topology. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 14-Aug-2015.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
indislem | ⊢ {∅, ( I ‘𝐴)} = {∅, 𝐴} |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | fvi 6740 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → ( I ‘𝐴) = 𝐴) | |
2 | 1 | preq2d 4676 | . 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → {∅, ( I ‘𝐴)} = {∅, 𝐴}) |
3 | dfsn2 4580 | . . . 4 ⊢ {∅} = {∅, ∅} | |
4 | 3 | eqcomi 2830 | . . 3 ⊢ {∅, ∅} = {∅} |
5 | fvprc 6663 | . . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ( I ‘𝐴) = ∅) | |
6 | 5 | preq2d 4676 | . . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → {∅, ( I ‘𝐴)} = {∅, ∅}) |
7 | prprc2 4702 | . . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → {∅, 𝐴} = {∅}) | |
8 | 4, 6, 7 | 3eqtr4a 2882 | . 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → {∅, ( I ‘𝐴)} = {∅, 𝐴}) |
9 | 2, 8 | pm2.61i 184 | 1 ⊢ {∅, ( I ‘𝐴)} = {∅, 𝐴} |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: ¬ wn 3 = wceq 1537 ∈ wcel 2114 Vcvv 3494 ∅c0 4291 {csn 4567 {cpr 4569 I cid 5459 ‘cfv 6355 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1796 ax-4 1810 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1970 ax-7 2015 ax-8 2116 ax-9 2124 ax-10 2145 ax-11 2161 ax-12 2177 ax-ext 2793 ax-sep 5203 ax-nul 5210 ax-pow 5266 ax-pr 5330 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 209 df-an 399 df-or 844 df-3an 1085 df-tru 1540 df-ex 1781 df-nf 1785 df-sb 2070 df-mo 2622 df-eu 2654 df-clab 2800 df-cleq 2814 df-clel 2893 df-nfc 2963 df-ral 3143 df-rex 3144 df-rab 3147 df-v 3496 df-sbc 3773 df-dif 3939 df-un 3941 df-in 3943 df-ss 3952 df-nul 4292 df-if 4468 df-sn 4568 df-pr 4570 df-op 4574 df-uni 4839 df-br 5067 df-opab 5129 df-id 5460 df-xp 5561 df-rel 5562 df-cnv 5563 df-co 5564 df-dm 5565 df-iota 6314 df-fun 6357 df-fv 6363 |
This theorem is referenced by: indistop 21610 indisuni 21611 indiscld 21699 indisconn 22026 txindis 22242 hmphindis 22405 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |