Theorem annimdc 932

Description: Express conjunction in terms of implication. The forward direction, annimim 681, is valid for all propositions, but as an equivalence, it requires a decidability condition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Apr-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
annimdc	|- (DECID ph -> (DECID ps -> ( ( ph /\ -. ps ) <-> -. ( ph -> ps ) ) ) )

Proof of Theorem annimdc

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		imandc 884	. . . 4 |- (DECID ps -> ( ( ph -> ps ) <-> -. ( ph /\ -. ps ) ) )
2	1	adantl 275	. . 3 |- ( (DECID ph /\ DECID ps ) -> ( ( ph -> ps ) <-> -. ( ph /\ -. ps ) ) )
3		dcim 836	. . . . 5 |- (DECID ph -> (DECID ps -> DECID ( ph -> ps ) ) )
4	3	imp 123	. . . 4 |- ( (DECID ph /\ DECID ps ) -> DECID ( ph -> ps ) )
5		dcn 837	. . . . . 6 |- (DECID ps -> DECID -. ps )
6		dcan2 929	. . . . . 6 |- (DECID ph -> (DECID -. ps -> DECID ( ph /\ -. ps ) ) )
7	5, 6	syl5 32	. . . . 5 |- (DECID ph -> (DECID ps -> DECID ( ph /\ -. ps ) ) )
8	7	imp 123	. . . 4 |- ( (DECID ph /\ DECID ps ) -> DECID ( ph /\ -. ps ) )
9		con2bidc 870	. . . 4 |- (DECID ( ph -> ps ) -> (DECID ( ph /\ -. ps ) -> ( ( ( ph -> ps ) <-> -. ( ph /\ -. ps ) ) <-> ( ( ph /\ -. ps ) <-> -. ( ph -> ps ) ) ) ) )
10	4, 8, 9	sylc 62	. . 3 |- ( (DECID ph /\ DECID ps ) -> ( ( ( ph -> ps ) <-> -. ( ph /\ -. ps ) ) <-> ( ( ph /\ -. ps ) <-> -. ( ph -> ps ) ) ) )
11	2, 10	mpbid 146	. 2 |- ( (DECID ph /\ DECID ps ) -> ( ( ph /\ -. ps ) <-> -. ( ph -> ps ) ) )
12	11	ex 114	1 |- (DECID ph -> (DECID ps -> ( ( ph /\ -. ps ) <-> -. ( ph -> ps ) ) ) )

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   -> wi 4   /\ wa 103   <-> wb 104  DECID wdc 829

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 609  ax-in2 610  ax-io 704

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-stab 826  df-dc 830

This theorem is referenced by:  xordidc  1394