P. 10 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 901-1000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	pm5.14dc 901	A decidable proposition is implied by or implies other propositions. Based on theorem *5.14 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 123. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Mar-2018.)
|- (DECID ps -> ( ( ph -> ps ) \/ ( ps -> ch ) ) )
Theorem	pm5.13dc 902	An implication holds in at least one direction, where one proposition is decidable. Based on theorem *5.13 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 123. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Mar-2018.)
|- (DECID ps -> ( ( ph -> ps ) \/ ( ps -> ph ) ) )
Theorem	pm5.55dc 903	A disjunction is equivalent to one of its disjuncts, given a decidable disjunct. Based on theorem *5.55 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 125. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Mar-2018.)
|- (DECID ph -> ( ( ( ph \/ ps ) <-> ph ) \/ ( ( ph \/ ps ) <-> ps ) ) )
Theorem	peircedc 904	Peirce's theorem for a decidable proposition. This odd-looking theorem can be seen as an alternative to exmiddc 826, condc 843, or notnotrdc 833 in the sense of expressing the "difference" between an intuitionistic system of propositional calculus and a classical system. In intuitionistic logic, it only holds for decidable propositions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Jul-2018.)
|- (DECID ph -> ( ( ( ph -> ps ) -> ph ) -> ph ) )
Theorem	looinvdc 905	The Inversion Axiom of the infinite-valued sentential logic (L-infinity) of Lukasiewicz, but where one of the propositions is decidable. Using dfor2dc 885, we can see that this expresses "disjunction commutes." Theorem *2.69 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 108 (plus the decidability condition). (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-2004.)
|- (DECID ph -> ( ( ( ph -> ps ) -> ps ) -> ( ( ps -> ph ) -> ph ) ) )
1.2.10  Miscellaneous theorems of propositional calculus
Theorem	pm5.21nd 906	Eliminate an antecedent implied by each side of a biconditional. (Contributed by NM, 20-Nov-2005.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Nov-2013.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ps ) -> th )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ch ) -> th )   &    |- ( th -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )
Theorem	pm5.35 907	Theorem *5.35 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 125. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
|- ( ( ( ph -> ps ) /\ ( ph -> ch ) ) -> ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) ) )
Theorem	pm5.54dc 908	A conjunction is equivalent to one of its conjuncts, given a decidable conjunct. Based on theorem *5.54 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 125. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Mar-2018.)
|- (DECID ph -> ( ( ( ph /\ ps ) <-> ph ) \/ ( ( ph /\ ps ) <-> ps ) ) )
Theorem	baib 909	Move conjunction outside of biconditional. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-1999.)
|- ( ph <-> ( ps /\ ch ) )   =>    |- ( ps -> ( ph <-> ch ) )
Theorem	baibr 910	Move conjunction outside of biconditional. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jul-1994.)
|- ( ph <-> ( ps /\ ch ) )   =>    |- ( ps -> ( ch <-> ph ) )
Theorem	rbaib 911	Move conjunction outside of biconditional. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.)
|- ( ph <-> ( ps /\ ch ) )   =>    |- ( ch -> ( ph <-> ps ) )
Theorem	rbaibr 912	Move conjunction outside of biconditional. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.)
|- ( ph <-> ( ps /\ ch ) )   =>    |- ( ch -> ( ps <-> ph ) )
Theorem	baibd 913	Move conjunction outside of biconditional. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ( ch /\ th ) ) )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ ch ) -> ( ps <-> th ) )
Theorem	rbaibd 914	Move conjunction outside of biconditional. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Sep-2015.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ( ch /\ th ) ) )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ th ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )
Theorem	pm5.44 915	Theorem *5.44 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 125. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
|- ( ( ph -> ps ) -> ( ( ph -> ch ) <-> ( ph -> ( ps /\ ch ) ) ) )
Theorem	pm5.6dc 916	Conjunction in antecedent versus disjunction in consequent, for a decidable proposition. Theorem *5.6 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 125, with decidability condition added. The reverse implication holds for all propositions (see pm5.6r 917). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Apr-2018.)
|- (DECID ps -> ( ( ( ph /\ -. ps ) -> ch ) <-> ( ph -> ( ps \/ ch ) ) ) )
Theorem	pm5.6r 917	Conjunction in antecedent versus disjunction in consequent. One direction of Theorem *5.6 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 125. If ps is decidable, the converse also holds (see pm5.6dc 916). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Aug-2018.)
|- ( ( ph -> ( ps \/ ch ) ) -> ( ( ph /\ -. ps ) -> ch ) )
Theorem	orcanai 918	Change disjunction in consequent to conjunction in antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jun-1994.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps \/ ch ) )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ -. ps ) -> ch )
Theorem	intnan 919	Introduction of conjunct inside of a contradiction. (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-1993.)
|- -. ph   =>    |- -. ( ps /\ ph )
Theorem	intnanr 920	Introduction of conjunct inside of a contradiction. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1995.)
|- -. ph   =>    |- -. ( ph /\ ps )
Theorem	intnand 921	Introduction of conjunct inside of a contradiction. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jul-2005.)
|- ( ph -> -. ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> -. ( ch /\ ps ) )
Theorem	intnanrd 922	Introduction of conjunct inside of a contradiction. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jul-2005.)
|- ( ph -> -. ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> -. ( ps /\ ch ) )
Theorem	dcan 923	A conjunction of two decidable propositions is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Apr-2018.)
|- ( (DECID ph /\ DECID ps ) -> DECID ( ph /\ ps ) )
Theorem	dcan2 924	A conjunction of two decidable propositions is decidable, expressed in a curried form as compared to dcan 923. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Apr-2018.)
|- (DECID ph -> (DECID ps -> DECID ( ph /\ ps ) ) )
Theorem	dcor 925	A disjunction of two decidable propositions is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Apr-2018.)
|- (DECID ph -> (DECID ps -> DECID ( ph \/ ps ) ) )
Theorem	dcbi 926	An equivalence of two decidable propositions is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Apr-2018.)
|- (DECID ph -> (DECID ps -> DECID ( ph <-> ps ) ) )
Theorem	annimdc 927	Express conjunction in terms of implication. The forward direction, annimim 676, is valid for all propositions, but as an equivalence, it requires a decidability condition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Apr-2018.)
|- (DECID ph -> (DECID ps -> ( ( ph /\ -. ps ) <-> -. ( ph -> ps ) ) ) )
Theorem	pm4.55dc 928	Theorem *4.55 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 120, for decidable propositions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-May-2018.)
|- (DECID ph -> (DECID ps -> ( -. ( -. ph /\ ps ) <-> ( ph \/ -. ps ) ) ) )
Theorem	orandc 929	Disjunction in terms of conjunction (De Morgan's law), for decidable propositions. Compare Theorem *4.57 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 120. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Dec-2021.)
|- ( (DECID ph /\ DECID ps ) -> ( ( ph \/ ps ) <-> -. ( -. ph /\ -. ps ) ) )
Theorem	mpbiran 930	Detach truth from conjunction in biconditional. (Contributed by NM, 27-Feb-1996.) (Revised by NM, 9-Jan-2015.)
|- ps   &    |- ( ph <-> ( ps /\ ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph <-> ch )
Theorem	mpbiran2 931	Detach truth from conjunction in biconditional. (Contributed by NM, 22-Feb-1996.) (Revised by NM, 9-Jan-2015.)
|- ch   &    |- ( ph <-> ( ps /\ ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph <-> ps )
Theorem	mpbir2an 932	Detach a conjunction of truths in a biconditional. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-2005.) (Revised by NM, 9-Jan-2015.)
|- ps   &    |- ch   &    |- ( ph <-> ( ps /\ ch ) )   =>    |- ph
Theorem	mpbi2and 933	Detach a conjunction of truths in a biconditional. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Nov-2012.)
|- ( ph -> ps )   &    |- ( ph -> ch )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( ps /\ ch ) <-> th ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> th )
Theorem	mpbir2and 934	Detach a conjunction of truths in a biconditional. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Nov-2012.)
|- ( ph -> ch )   &    |- ( ph -> th )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ( ch /\ th ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ps )
Theorem	pm5.62dc 935	Theorem *5.62 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 125, for a decidable proposition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-May-2018.)
|- (DECID ps -> ( ( ( ph /\ ps ) \/ -. ps ) <-> ( ph \/ -. ps ) ) )
Theorem	pm5.63dc 936	Theorem *5.63 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 125, for a decidable proposition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-May-2018.)
|- (DECID ph -> ( ( ph \/ ps ) <-> ( ph \/ ( -. ph /\ ps ) ) ) )
Theorem	bianfi 937	A wff conjoined with falsehood is false. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 26-Nov-2012.)
|- -. ph   =>    |- ( ph <-> ( ps /\ ph ) )
Theorem	bianfd 938	A wff conjoined with falsehood is false. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1995.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Nov-2013.)
|- ( ph -> -. ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ( ps /\ ch ) ) )
Theorem	pm4.43 939	Theorem *4.43 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 119. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 26-Nov-2012.)
|- ( ph <-> ( ( ph \/ ps ) /\ ( ph \/ -. ps ) ) )
Theorem	pm4.82 940	Theorem *4.82 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 122. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
|- ( ( ( ph -> ps ) /\ ( ph -> -. ps ) ) <-> -. ph )
Theorem	pm4.83dc 941	Theorem *4.83 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 122, for decidable propositions. As with other case elimination theorems, like pm2.61dc 855, it only holds for decidable propositions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-May-2018.)
|- (DECID ph -> ( ( ( ph -> ps ) /\ ( -. ph -> ps ) ) <-> ps ) )
Theorem	biantr 942	A transitive law of equivalence. Compare Theorem *4.22 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 117. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.)
|- ( ( ( ph <-> ps ) /\ ( ch <-> ps ) ) -> ( ph <-> ch ) )
Theorem	orbididc 943	Disjunction distributes over the biconditional, for a decidable proposition. Based on an axiom of system DS in Vladimir Lifschitz, "On calculational proofs" (1998), http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.25.3384. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Apr-2018.)
|- (DECID ph -> ( ( ph \/ ( ps <-> ch ) ) <-> ( ( ph \/ ps ) <-> ( ph \/ ch ) ) ) )
Theorem	pm5.7dc 944	Disjunction distributes over the biconditional, for a decidable proposition. Based on theorem *5.7 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 125. This theorem is similar to orbididc 943. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Apr-2018.)
|- (DECID ch -> ( ( ( ph \/ ch ) <-> ( ps \/ ch ) ) <-> ( ch \/ ( ph <-> ps ) ) ) )
Theorem	bigolden 945	Dijkstra-Scholten's Golden Rule for calculational proofs. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2005.)
|- ( ( ( ph /\ ps ) <-> ph ) <-> ( ps <-> ( ph \/ ps ) ) )
Theorem	anordc 946	Conjunction in terms of disjunction (DeMorgan's law). Theorem *4.5 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 120, but where the propositions are decidable. The forward direction, pm3.1 744, holds for all propositions, but the equivalence only holds given decidability. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Apr-2018.)
|- (DECID ph -> (DECID ps -> ( ( ph /\ ps ) <-> -. ( -. ph \/ -. ps ) ) ) )
Theorem	pm3.11dc 947	Theorem *3.11 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 111, but for decidable propositions. The converse, pm3.1 744, holds for all propositions, not just decidable ones. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Apr-2018.)
|- (DECID ph -> (DECID ps -> ( -. ( -. ph \/ -. ps ) -> ( ph /\ ps ) ) ) )
Theorem	pm3.12dc 948	Theorem *3.12 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 111, but for decidable propositions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Apr-2018.)
|- (DECID ph -> (DECID ps -> ( ( -. ph \/ -. ps ) \/ ( ph /\ ps ) ) ) )
Theorem	pm3.13dc 949	Theorem *3.13 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 111, but for decidable propositions. The converse, pm3.14 743, holds for all propositions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Apr-2018.)
|- (DECID ph -> (DECID ps -> ( -. ( ph /\ ps ) -> ( -. ph \/ -. ps ) ) ) )
Theorem	dn1dc 950	DN1 for decidable propositions. Without the decidability conditions, DN1 can serve as a single axiom for Boolean algebra. See http://www-unix.mcs.anl.gov/~mccune/papers/basax/v12.pdf. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 22-Apr-2018.)
|- ( (DECID ph /\ (DECID ps /\ (DECID ch /\ DECID th ) ) ) -> ( -. ( -. ( -. ( ph \/ ps ) \/ ch ) \/ -. ( ph \/ -. ( -. ch \/ -. ( ch \/ th ) ) ) ) <-> ch ) )
Theorem	pm5.71dc 951	Decidable proposition version of theorem *5.71 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 125. (Contributed by Roy F. Longton, 23-Jun-2005.) (Modified for decidability by Jim Kingdon, 19-Apr-2018.)
|- (DECID ps -> ( ( ps -> -. ch ) -> ( ( ( ph \/ ps ) /\ ch ) <-> ( ph /\ ch ) ) ) )
Theorem	pm5.75 952	Theorem *5.75 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 126. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 7-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 23-Dec-2012.)
|- ( ( ( ch -> -. ps ) /\ ( ph <-> ( ps \/ ch ) ) ) -> ( ( ph /\ -. ps ) <-> ch ) )
Theorem	bimsc1 953	Removal of conjunct from one side of an equivalence. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( ( ( ph -> ps ) /\ ( ch <-> ( ps /\ ph ) ) ) -> ( ch <-> ph ) )
Theorem	ccase 954	Inference for combining cases. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-1999.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 6-Jan-2013.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ps ) -> ta )   &    |- ( ( ch /\ ps ) -> ta )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ th ) -> ta )   &    |- ( ( ch /\ th ) -> ta )   =>    |- ( ( ( ph \/ ch ) /\ ( ps \/ th ) ) -> ta )
Theorem	ccased 955	Deduction for combining cases. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-2004.)
|- ( ph -> ( ( ps /\ ch ) -> et ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( th /\ ch ) -> et ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( ps /\ ta ) -> et ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ( th /\ ta ) -> et ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( ( ps \/ th ) /\ ( ch \/ ta ) ) -> et ) )
Theorem	ccase2 956	Inference for combining cases. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-1999.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ps ) -> ta )   &    |- ( ch -> ta )   &    |- ( th -> ta )   =>    |- ( ( ( ph \/ ch ) /\ ( ps \/ th ) ) -> ta )
Theorem	niabn 957	Miscellaneous inference relating falsehoods. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1994.)
|- ph   =>    |- ( -. ps -> ( ( ch /\ ps ) <-> -. ph ) )
Theorem	dedlem0a 958	Alternate version of dedlema 959. (Contributed by NM, 2-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 7-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 4-Dec-2012.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ( ( ch -> ph ) -> ( ps /\ ph ) ) ) )
Theorem	dedlema 959	Lemma for iftrue 3525. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 7-May-2011.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ( ( ps /\ ph ) \/ ( ch /\ -. ph ) ) ) )
Theorem	dedlemb 960	Lemma for iffalse 3528. (Contributed by NM, 15-May-1999.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 7-May-2011.)
|- ( -. ph -> ( ch <-> ( ( ps /\ ph ) \/ ( ch /\ -. ph ) ) ) )
Theorem	pm4.42r 961	One direction of Theorem *4.42 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 119. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Aug-2018.)
|- ( ( ( ph /\ ps ) \/ ( ph /\ -. ps ) ) -> ph )
Theorem	ninba 962	Miscellaneous inference relating falsehoods. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1994.)
|- ph   =>    |- ( -. ps -> ( -. ph <-> ( ch /\ ps ) ) )
Theorem	prlem1 963	A specialized lemma for set theory (to derive the Axiom of Pairing). (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 13-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 5-Jan-2013.)
|- ( ph -> ( et <-> ch ) )   &    |- ( ps -> -. th )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ps -> ( ( ( ps /\ ch ) \/ ( th /\ ta ) ) -> et ) ) )
Theorem	prlem2 964	A specialized lemma for set theory (to derive the Axiom of Pairing). (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 13-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 9-Dec-2012.)
|- ( ( ( ph /\ ps ) \/ ( ch /\ th ) ) <-> ( ( ph \/ ch ) /\ ( ( ph /\ ps ) \/ ( ch /\ th ) ) ) )
Theorem	oplem1 965	A specialized lemma for set theory (ordered pair theorem). (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-1995.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 8-Dec-2012.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 2-Feb-2015.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps \/ ch ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( th \/ ta ) )   &    |- ( ps <-> th )   &    |- ( ch -> ( th <-> ta ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ps )
Theorem	rnlem 966	Lemma used in construction of real numbers. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 26-Jun-2011.)
|- ( ( ( ph /\ ps ) /\ ( ch /\ th ) ) <-> ( ( ( ph /\ ch ) /\ ( ps /\ th ) ) /\ ( ( ph /\ th ) /\ ( ps /\ ch ) ) ) )
1.2.11  Abbreviated conjunction and disjunction of three wff's
Syntax	w3o 967	Extend wff definition to include 3-way disjunction ('or').
wff ( ph \/ ps \/ ch )
Syntax	w3a 968	Extend wff definition to include 3-way conjunction ('and').
wff ( ph /\ ps /\ ch )
Definition	df-3or 969	Define disjunction ('or') of 3 wff's. Definition *2.33 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 105. This abbreviation reduces the number of parentheses and emphasizes that the order of bracketing is not important by virtue of the associative law orass 757. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-1994.)
|- ( ( ph \/ ps \/ ch ) <-> ( ( ph \/ ps ) \/ ch ) )
Definition	df-3an 970	Define conjunction ('and') of 3 wff.s. Definition *4.34 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 118. This abbreviation reduces the number of parentheses and emphasizes that the order of bracketing is not important by virtue of the associative law anass 399. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-1994.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) <-> ( ( ph /\ ps ) /\ ch ) )
Theorem	3orass 971	Associative law for triple disjunction. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-1994.)
|- ( ( ph \/ ps \/ ch ) <-> ( ph \/ ( ps \/ ch ) ) )
Theorem	3anass 972	Associative law for triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-1994.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) <-> ( ph /\ ( ps /\ ch ) ) )
Theorem	3anrot 973	Rotation law for triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-1994.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) <-> ( ps /\ ch /\ ph ) )
Theorem	3orrot 974	Rotation law for triple disjunction. (Contributed by NM, 4-Apr-1995.)
|- ( ( ph \/ ps \/ ch ) <-> ( ps \/ ch \/ ph ) )
Theorem	3ancoma 975	Commutation law for triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-1994.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) <-> ( ps /\ ph /\ ch ) )
Theorem	3ancomb 976	Commutation law for triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-1994.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) <-> ( ph /\ ch /\ ps ) )
Theorem	3orcomb 977	Commutation law for triple disjunction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Apr-2011.)
|- ( ( ph \/ ps \/ ch ) <-> ( ph \/ ch \/ ps ) )
Theorem	3anrev 978	Reversal law for triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-1994.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) <-> ( ch /\ ps /\ ph ) )
Theorem	3anan32 979	Convert triple conjunction to conjunction, then commute. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) <-> ( ( ph /\ ch ) /\ ps ) )
Theorem	3anan12 980	Convert triple conjunction to conjunction, then commute. (Contributed by Jonathan Ben-Naim, 3-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 14-Jun-2011.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) <-> ( ps /\ ( ph /\ ch ) ) )
Theorem	anandi3 981	Distribution of triple conjunction over conjunction. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 4-Nov-2018.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) <-> ( ( ph /\ ps ) /\ ( ph /\ ch ) ) )
Theorem	anandi3r 982	Distribution of triple conjunction over conjunction. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 4-Nov-2018.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) <-> ( ( ph /\ ps ) /\ ( ch /\ ps ) ) )
Theorem	3ioran 983	Negated triple disjunction as triple conjunction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 19-Apr-2011.)
|- ( -. ( ph \/ ps \/ ch ) <-> ( -. ph /\ -. ps /\ -. ch ) )
Theorem	3simpa 984	Simplification of triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-1994.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) -> ( ph /\ ps ) )
Theorem	3simpb 985	Simplification of triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-1994.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) -> ( ph /\ ch ) )
Theorem	3simpc 986	Simplification of triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 13-May-2011.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) -> ( ps /\ ch ) )
Theorem	simp1 987	Simplification of triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-1994.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) -> ph )
Theorem	simp2 988	Simplification of triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-1994.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) -> ps )
Theorem	simp3 989	Simplification of triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 21-Apr-1994.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) -> ch )
Theorem	simpl1 990	Simplification rule. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 17-Nov-2009.)
|- ( ( ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) /\ th ) -> ph )
Theorem	simpl2 991	Simplification rule. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 17-Nov-2009.)
|- ( ( ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) /\ th ) -> ps )
Theorem	simpl3 992	Simplification rule. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 17-Nov-2009.)
|- ( ( ( ph /\ ps /\ ch ) /\ th ) -> ch )
Theorem	simpr1 993	Simplification rule. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 17-Nov-2009.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ( ps /\ ch /\ th ) ) -> ps )
Theorem	simpr2 994	Simplification rule. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 17-Nov-2009.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ( ps /\ ch /\ th ) ) -> ch )
Theorem	simpr3 995	Simplification rule. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 17-Nov-2009.)
|- ( ( ph /\ ( ps /\ ch /\ th ) ) -> th )
Theorem	simp1i 996	Infer a conjunct from a triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-2005.)
|- ( ph /\ ps /\ ch )   =>    |- ph
Theorem	simp2i 997	Infer a conjunct from a triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-2005.)
|- ( ph /\ ps /\ ch )   =>    |- ps
Theorem	simp3i 998	Infer a conjunct from a triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 19-Apr-2005.)
|- ( ph /\ ps /\ ch )   =>    |- ch
Theorem	simp1d 999	Deduce a conjunct from a triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2005.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps /\ ch /\ th ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ps )
Theorem	simp2d 1000	Deduce a conjunct from a triple conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2005.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps /\ ch /\ th ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ch )