Theorem im2anan9 606

Description: Deduction joining nested implications to form implication of conjunctions. (Contributed by NM, 29-Feb-1996.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
im2an9.1	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
im2an9.2	⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
im2anan9	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜂)))

Proof of Theorem im2anan9

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		im2an9.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
2	1	adantr 276	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
3		im2an9.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))
4	3	adantl 277	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → (𝜏 → 𝜂))
5	2, 4	anim12d 335	1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜂)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117

This theorem is used by:  im2anan9r  607  trin  4239  xpss12  4882  f1oun  5659  poxp  6468  brecop  6899  enq0sym  7799  genpdisj  7890  tgcl  15165  txlm  15380  upgrpredgv  16387