P. 6 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 501-600   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	simpll 501	Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 18-Mar-2007.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜑)
Theorem	simplr 502	Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 20-Mar-2007.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜓)
Theorem	simprl 503	Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 21-Mar-2007.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜓)
Theorem	simprr 504	Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 21-Mar-2007.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜒)
Theorem	simplll 505	Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 28-Jul-2009.)
⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜑)
Theorem	simpllr 506	Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 28-Jul-2009.)
⊢ ((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜓)
Theorem	simplrl 507	Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 28-Jul-2009.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜓)
Theorem	simplrr 508	Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 28-Jul-2009.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜒)
Theorem	simprll 509	Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 28-Jul-2009.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃)) → 𝜓)
Theorem	simprlr 510	Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 28-Jul-2009.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃)) → 𝜒)
Theorem	simprrl 511	Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 28-Jul-2009.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))) → 𝜒)
Theorem	simprrr 512	Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 28-Jul-2009.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃))) → 𝜃)
Theorem	simp-4l 513	Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜑)
Theorem	simp-4r 514	Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) → 𝜓)
Theorem	simp-5l 515	Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ ((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜑)
Theorem	simp-5r 516	Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ ((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) → 𝜓)
Theorem	simp-6l 517	Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) → 𝜑)
Theorem	simp-6r 518	Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) → 𝜓)
Theorem	simp-7l 519	Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ ((((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) → 𝜑)
Theorem	simp-7r 520	Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ ((((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) → 𝜓)
Theorem	simp-8l 521	Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (((((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝜌) → 𝜑)
Theorem	simp-8r 522	Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (((((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝜌) → 𝜓)
Theorem	simp-9l 523	Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ ((((((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝜌) ∧ 𝜇) → 𝜑)
Theorem	simp-9r 524	Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ ((((((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝜌) ∧ 𝜇) → 𝜓)
Theorem	simp-10l 525	Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (((((((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝜌) ∧ 𝜇) ∧ 𝜆) → 𝜑)
Theorem	simp-10r 526	Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (((((((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝜌) ∧ 𝜇) ∧ 𝜆) → 𝜓)
Theorem	simp-11l 527	Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ ((((((((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝜌) ∧ 𝜇) ∧ 𝜆) ∧ 𝜅) → 𝜑)
Theorem	simp-11r 528	Simplification of a conjunction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ ((((((((((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜃) ∧ 𝜏) ∧ 𝜂) ∧ 𝜁) ∧ 𝜎) ∧ 𝜌) ∧ 𝜇) ∧ 𝜆) ∧ 𝜅) → 𝜓)
Theorem	pm4.87 529	Theorem *4.87 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 122. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) (Proof shortened by Eric Schmidt, 26-Oct-2006.)
⊢ (((((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))) ∧ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ↔ (𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)))) ∧ ((𝜓 → (𝜑 → 𝜒)) ↔ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒)))
Theorem	a2and 530	Deduction distributing a conjunction as embedded antecedent. (Contributed by AV, 25-Oct-2019.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 19-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜌) → (𝜏 → 𝜃)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜌) → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜏) → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜌) → 𝜃)))
Theorem	animpimp2impd 531	Deduction deriving nested implications from conjunctions. (Contributed by AV, 21-Aug-2022.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → (𝜒 → (𝜃 → 𝜂)))    &   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜃)) → (𝜂 → 𝜏))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 → 𝜒) → (𝜓 → (𝜃 → 𝜏))))
Theorem	abai 532	Introduce one conjunct as an antecedent to the other. "abai" stands for "and, biconditional, and, implication". (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 7-Dec-2012.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ (𝜑 → 𝜓)))
Theorem	an12 533	Swap two conjuncts. Note that the first digit (1) in the label refers to the outer conjunct position, and the next digit (2) to the inner conjunct position. (Contributed by NM, 12-Mar-1995.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ↔ (𝜓 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	an32 534	A rearrangement of conjuncts. (Contributed by NM, 12-Mar-1995.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 25-Dec-2012.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	an13 535	A rearrangement of conjuncts. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2012.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 31-Dec-2012.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ↔ (𝜒 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑)))
Theorem	an31 536	A rearrangement of conjuncts. (Contributed by NM, 24-Jun-2012.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 31-Dec-2012.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	an12s 537	Swap two conjuncts in antecedent. The label suffix "s" means that an12 533 is combined with syl 14 (or a variant). (Contributed by NM, 13-Mar-1996.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃)
Theorem	ancom2s 538	Inference commuting a nested conjunction in antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜃)
Theorem	an13s 539	Swap two conjuncts in antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2006.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜑)) → 𝜃)
Theorem	an32s 540	Swap two conjuncts in antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 13-Mar-1996.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃)
Theorem	ancom1s 541	Inference commuting a nested conjunction in antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 24-May-2006.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 24-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)
Theorem	an31s 542	Swap two conjuncts in antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2006.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝜒 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜃)
Theorem	anass1rs 543	Commutative-associative law for conjunction in an antecedent. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 19-Jun-2011.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜃)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜃)
Theorem	anabs1 544	Absorption into embedded conjunct. (Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-1995.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 16-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	anabs5 545	Absorption into embedded conjunct. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jul-1996.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 9-Dec-2012.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	anabs7 546	Absorption into embedded conjunct. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jul-1996.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 17-Nov-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	anabsan 547	Absorption of antecedent with conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-1996.) (Revised by NM, 18-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	anabss1 548	Absorption of antecedent into conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jul-1996.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 31-Dec-2012.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	anabss4 549	Absorption of antecedent into conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jul-1996.)
⊢ (((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	anabss5 550	Absorption of antecedent into conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 1-Jan-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	anabsi5 551	Absorption of antecedent into conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-1995.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 18-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	anabsi6 552	Absorption of antecedent into conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-2000.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	anabsi7 553	Absorption of antecedent into conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jul-1996.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 18-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (𝜓 → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	anabsi8 554	Absorption of antecedent into conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 26-Sep-1999.)
⊢ (𝜓 → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	anabss7 555	Absorption of antecedent into conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jul-1996.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 19-Nov-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	anabsan2 556	Absorption of antecedent with conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 10-May-2004.) (Revised by NM, 1-Jan-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	anabss3 557	Absorption of antecedent into conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jul-1996.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 1-Jan-2013.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)
Theorem	an4 558	Rearrangement of 4 conjuncts. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jul-1994.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃)))
Theorem	an42 559	Rearrangement of 4 conjuncts. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-1996.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜓)))
Theorem	an4s 560	Inference rearranging 4 conjuncts in antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1995.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃)) → 𝜏)
Theorem	an42s 561	Inference rearranging 4 conjuncts in antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 10-Aug-1995.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜃 ∧ 𝜓)) → 𝜏)
Theorem	anandi 562	Distribution of conjunction over conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 14-Aug-1995.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	anandir 563	Distribution of conjunction over conjunction. (Contributed by NM, 24-Aug-1995.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	anandis 564	Inference that undistributes conjunction in the antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-2004.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜏)
Theorem	anandirs 565	Inference that undistributes conjunction in the antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jun-2004.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜏)
Theorem	syl2an2 566	syl2an 285 with antecedents in standard conjunction form. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 27-Aug-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜒 ∧ 𝜑) → 𝜏)
Theorem	syl2an2r 567	syl2anr 286 with antecedents in standard conjunction form. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 27-Aug-2016.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜃)    &   ⊢ ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜏)
Theorem	impbida 568	Deduce an equivalence from two implications. (Contributed by NM, 17-Feb-2007.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	pm3.45 569	Theorem *3.45 (Fact) of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜒) → (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	im2anan9 570	Deduction joining nested implications to form implication of conjunctions. (Contributed by NM, 29-Feb-1996.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜂)))
Theorem	im2anan9r 571	Deduction joining nested implications to form implication of conjunctions. (Contributed by NM, 29-Feb-1996.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 → 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜑) → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜂)))
Theorem	anim12dan 572	Conjoin antecedents and consequents in a deduction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2014.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → 𝜏)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜃)) → (𝜒 ∧ 𝜏))
Theorem	pm5.1 573	Two propositions are equivalent if they are both true. Theorem *5.1 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 123. (Contributed by NM, 21-May-1994.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	pm3.43 574	Theorem *3.43 (Comp) of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 113. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.) (Revised by NM, 27-Nov-2013.)
⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 → 𝜒)) → (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	jcab 575	Distributive law for implication over conjunction. Compare Theorem *4.76 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 121. (Contributed by NM, 3-Apr-1994.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 27-Nov-2013.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) ↔ ((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 → 𝜒)))
Theorem	pm4.76 576	Theorem *4.76 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 121. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (((𝜑 → 𝜓) ∧ (𝜑 → 𝜒)) ↔ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	pm4.38 577	Theorem *4.38 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 118. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (((𝜑 ↔ 𝜒) ∧ (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) → ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)))
Theorem	bi2anan9 578	Deduction joining two equivalences to form equivalence of conjunctions. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-1995.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜂)))
Theorem	bi2anan9r 579	Deduction joining two equivalences to form equivalence of conjunctions. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-1996.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜃 ∧ 𝜑) → ((𝜓 ∧ 𝜏) ↔ (𝜒 ∧ 𝜂)))
Theorem	bi2bian9 580	Deduction joining two biconditionals with different antecedents. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2004.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝜃 → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜂))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜃) → ((𝜓 ↔ 𝜏) ↔ (𝜒 ↔ 𝜂)))
Theorem	pm5.33 581	Theorem *5.33 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 125. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → 𝜒)))
Theorem	pm5.36 582	Theorem *5.36 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 125. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ↔ (𝜓 ∧ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)))
Theorem	bianabs 583	Absorb a hypothesis into the second member of a biconditional. (Contributed by FL, 15-Feb-2007.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	biadani 584	An implication implies to the equivalence of some implied equivalence and some other equivalence involving a conjunction. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜓 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) ↔ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	biadanii 585	Inference associated with biadani 584. Add a conjunction to an equivalence. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 20-Jun-2011.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 4-Mar-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ (𝜓 ∧ 𝜒))
1.2.5  Logical negation (intuitionistic)
Axiom	ax-in1 586	'Not' introduction. One of the axioms of propositional logic. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → ¬ 𝜑) → ¬ 𝜑)
Axiom	ax-in2 587	'Not' elimination. One of the axioms of propositional logic. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	pm2.01 588	Reductio ad absurdum. Theorem *2.01 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 100. This is valid intuitionistically (in the terminology of Section 1.2 of [Bauer] p. 482 it is a proof of negation not a proof by contradiction); compare with pm2.18dc 823 which only holds for some propositions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝜑 → ¬ 𝜑) → ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	pm2.21 589	From a wff and its negation, anything is true. Theorem *2.21 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 104. Also called the Duns Scotus law. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-May-2015.)
⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → (𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	pm2.01d 590	Deduction based on reductio ad absurdum. (Contributed by NM, 18-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ¬ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)
Theorem	pm2.21d 591	A contradiction implies anything. Deduction from pm2.21 589. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1996.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))
Theorem	pm2.21dd 592	A contradiction implies anything. Deduction from pm2.21 589. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)
Theorem	pm2.24 593	Theorem *2.24 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 104. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2005.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	pm2.24d 594	Deduction version of pm2.24 593. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jan-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝜓 → 𝜒))
Theorem	pm2.24i 595	Inference version of pm2.24 593. (Contributed by NM, 20-Aug-2001.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → 𝜓)
Theorem	con2d 596	A contraposition deduction. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-1993.) (Revised by NM, 12-Feb-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ¬ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜒 → ¬ 𝜓))
Theorem	mt2d 597	Modus tollens deduction. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-1994.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → ¬ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)
Theorem	nsyl3 598	A negated syllogism inference. (Contributed by NM, 1-Dec-1995.) (Revised by NM, 13-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜒 → ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	con2i 599	A contraposition inference. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by O'Cat, 28-Nov-2008.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 13-Jun-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜓 → ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	nsyl 600	A negated syllogism inference. (Contributed by NM, 31-Dec-1993.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 2-Mar-2013.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜓)    &   ⊢ (𝜒 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝜒)