ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  imandc GIF version

Theorem imandc 857
Description: Express implication in terms of conjunction. Theorem 3.4(27) of [Stoll] p. 176, with an added decidability condition. The forward direction, imanim 660, holds for all propositions, not just decidable ones. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Apr-2018.)
Assertion
Ref Expression
imandc (DECID 𝜓 → ((𝜑𝜓) ↔ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)))

Proof of Theorem imandc
StepHypRef Expression
1 dcstab 812 . 2 (DECID 𝜓STAB 𝜓)
2 imanst 856 . 2 (STAB 𝜓 → ((𝜑𝜓) ↔ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)))
31, 2syl 14 1 (DECID 𝜓 → ((𝜑𝜓) ↔ ¬ (𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓)))
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3  wi 4  wa 103  wb 104  STAB wstab 798  DECID wdc 802
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 586  ax-in2 587  ax-io 681
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-stab 799  df-dc 803
This theorem is referenced by:  annimdc  904  isprm3  11706
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator