Theorem nfcrd 2269

Description: Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
nfeqd.1	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfcrd	⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦   𝑦,𝐴

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥,𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem nfcrd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfeqd.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝐴)
2		nfcr 2247	. 2 ⊢ (Ⅎ𝑥𝐴 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)
3	1, 2	syl 14	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴)

Syntax hints:   → wi 4  Ⅎwnf 1419   ∈ wcel 1463  Ⅎwnfc 2242

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-1 5  ax-2 6  ax-mp 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-4 1470

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nfc 2244

This theorem is referenced by:  nfeqd  2270  nfeld  2271  dvelimdc  2275  nfcsbd  3002  nfifd  3465