Theorem nfcrd 2353

Description: Consequence of the not-free predicate. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
nfeqd.1	|- ( ph -> F/_ x A )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nfcrd	|- ( ph -> F/ x y e. A )

Distinct variable groups:   x, y   y, A

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y)   A( x)

Proof of Theorem nfcrd

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		nfeqd.1	. 2 |- ( ph -> F/_ x A )
2		nfcr 2331	. 2 |- ( F/_ x A -> F/ x y e. A )
3	1, 2	syl 14	1 |- ( ph -> F/ x y e. A )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   F/wnf 1474   e. wcel 2167   F/_wnfc 2326

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-4 1524

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-nfc 2328

This theorem is referenced by:  nfeqd  2354  nfeld  2355  dvelimdc  2360  nfcsbd  3120  nfcsbw  3121  nfifd  3589