Theorem xordc 1392

Description: Two ways to express "exclusive or" between decidable propositions. Theorem *5.22 of [WhiteheadRussell] p. 124, but for decidable propositions. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-May-2018.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
xordc	⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (DECID 𝜓 → (¬ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)))))

Proof of Theorem xordc

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		xornbidc 1391	. . . 4 ⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (DECID 𝜓 → ((𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))))
2	1	imp 124	. . 3 ⊢ ((DECID 𝜑 ∧ DECID 𝜓) → ((𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓) ↔ ¬ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)))
3		excxor 1378	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ∨ (¬ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
4		ancom 266	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ↔ (𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜑))
5	4	orbi2i 762	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ∨ (¬ 𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)))
6	3, 5	bitri 184	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ⊻ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)))
7	2, 6	bitr3di 195	. 2 ⊢ ((DECID 𝜑 ∧ DECID 𝜓) → (¬ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜑))))
8	7	ex 115	1 ⊢ (DECID 𝜑 → (DECID 𝜓 → (¬ (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜓) ∨ (𝜓 ∧ ¬ 𝜑)))))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   ∨ wo 708  DECID wdc 834   ⊻ wxo 1375

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 614  ax-in2 615  ax-io 709

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-stab 831  df-dc 835  df-xor 1376

This theorem is referenced by:  dfbi3dc  1397  pm5.24dc  1398