Theorem 3oalem4 31689

Description: Lemma for 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
3oalem4.3	⊢ 𝑅 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
3oalem4	⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵)

Proof of Theorem 3oalem4

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		3oalem4.3	. 2 ⊢ 𝑅 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴))
2		inss1 4187	. 2 ⊢ ((⊥‘𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴)) ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵)
3	1, 2	eqsstri 3978	1 ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵)

Syntax hints:   = wceq 1541   ∩ cin 3898   ⊆ wss 3899  ‘cfv 6490  (class class class)co 7356  ⊥cort 30954   ∨_ℋ chj 30957

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1968  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2115  ax-9 2123  ax-ext 2706

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-tru 1544  df-ex 1781  df-sb 2068  df-clab 2713  df-cleq 2726  df-clel 2809  df-v 3440  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916

This theorem is referenced by:  3oalem5  31690