Theorem 3oalem4 31983

Description: Lemma for 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
3oalem4.3	⊢ 𝑅 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
3oalem4	⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵)

Proof of Theorem 3oalem4

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		3oalem4.3	. 2 ⊢ 𝑅 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴))
2		inss1 4188	. 2 ⊢ ((⊥‘𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴)) ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵)
3	1, 2	eqsstri 3982	1 ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵)

Syntax hints:   = wceq 1568   ∩ cin 3903   ⊆ wss 3904  ‘cfv 6536  (class class class)co 7410  ⊥cort 31248   ∨_ℋ chj 31251

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1823  ax-4 1837  ax-5 1938  ax-6 1995  ax-7 2036  ax-8 2143  ax-9 2151  ax-ext 2733

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-tru 1571  df-ex 1808  df-sb 2095  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-v 3455  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921

This theorem is referenced by:  3oalem5  31984