Theorem 3oalem4 32028

Description: Lemma for 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
3oalem4.3	⊢ 𝑅 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
3oalem4	⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵)

Proof of Theorem 3oalem4

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		3oalem4.3	. 2 ⊢ 𝑅 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴))
2		inss1 4188	. 2 ⊢ ((⊥‘𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴)) ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵)
3	1, 2	eqsstri 3982	1 ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   = wceq 1569   ∩ cin 3903   ⊆ wss 3904  ‘cfv 6536  (class class class)co 7412  ⊥cort 31293   ∨_ℋ chj 31296

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1824  ax-4 1838  ax-5 1939  ax-6 1996  ax-7 2037  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-ext 2734

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-tru 1572  df-ex 1809  df-sb 2096  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-v 3456  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921

This theorem is used by:  3oalem5  32029