Theorem 3oalem4 31744

Description: Lemma for 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
3oalem4.3	⊢ 𝑅 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
3oalem4	⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵)

Proof of Theorem 3oalem4

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		3oalem4.3	. 2 ⊢ 𝑅 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴))
2		inss1 4190	. 2 ⊢ ((⊥‘𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴)) ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵)
3	1, 2	eqsstri 3981	1 ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵)

Syntax hints:   = wceq 1542   ∩ cin 3901   ⊆ wss 3902  ‘cfv 6493  (class class class)co 7360  ⊥cort 31009   ∨_ℋ chj 31012

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-ext 2709

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-tru 1545  df-ex 1782  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-v 3443  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919

This theorem is referenced by:  3oalem5  31745