Theorem 3oalem4 31693

Description: Lemma for 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
3oalem4.3	⊢ 𝑅 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
3oalem4	⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵)

Proof of Theorem 3oalem4

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		3oalem4.3	. 2 ⊢ 𝑅 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴))
2		inss1 4244	. 2 ⊢ ((⊥‘𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴)) ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵)
3	1, 2	eqsstri 4029	1 ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵)

Syntax hints:   = wceq 1536   ∩ cin 3961   ⊆ wss 3962  ‘cfv 6562  (class class class)co 7430  ⊥cort 30958   ∨_ℋ chj 30961

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1791  ax-4 1805  ax-5 1907  ax-6 1964  ax-7 2004  ax-8 2107  ax-9 2115  ax-ext 2705

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-tru 1539  df-ex 1776  df-sb 2062  df-clab 2712  df-cleq 2726  df-clel 2813  df-v 3479  df-in 3969  df-ss 3979

This theorem is referenced by:  3oalem5  31694