Theorem 3oalem4 29928

Description: Lemma for 3OA (weak) orthoarguesian law. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-1999.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
3oalem4.3	⊢ 𝑅 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
3oalem4	⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵)

Proof of Theorem 3oalem4

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		3oalem4.3	. 2 ⊢ 𝑅 = ((⊥‘𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴))
2		inss1 4159	. 2 ⊢ ((⊥‘𝐵) ∩ (𝐵 ∨ℋ 𝐴)) ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵)
3	1, 2	eqsstri 3951	1 ⊢ 𝑅 ⊆ (⊥‘𝐵)

Syntax hints:   = wceq 1539   ∩ cin 3882   ⊆ wss 3883  ‘cfv 6418  (class class class)co 7255  ⊥cort 29193   ∨_ℋ chj 29196

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-ext 2709

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-tru 1542  df-ex 1784  df-sb 2069  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-v 3424  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900

This theorem is referenced by:  3oalem5  29929