Description: Define the subclass
relationship. Exercise 9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18.
For example, {1, 2} ⊆ {1, 2, 3} (ex-ss 27894). Note that
𝐴
⊆ 𝐴 (proved in
ssid 3916). Contrast this relationship with the
relationship 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 (as will be defined in df-pss 3882). For a more
traditional definition, but requiring a dummy variable, see dfss2 3883.
Other possible definitions are given by dfss3 3884, dfss4 4161, sspss 4003,
ssequn1 4083, ssequn2 4086, sseqin2 4118, and ssdif0 4249.
We prefer the label "ss" ("subset") for ⊆, despite the fact that it
applies to classes. It is much more common to refer to this as the subset
relation than subclass, especially since most of the time the arguments
are in fact sets (and for pragmatic reasons we don't want to need to use
different operations for sets). The way set.mm is set up, many things are
technically classes despite morally (and provably) being sets, like 1
(cf. df-1 10398 and 1ex 10490) or ℝ
( cf. df-r 10400 and reex 10481). This has to
do with the fact that there are no "set expressions": classes
are
expressions but there are only set variables in set.mm (cf.
https://us.metamath.org/downloads/grammar-ambiguity.txt 10481). This is why
we use ⊆ both for subclass relations and for
subset relations and
call it "subset". (Contributed by NM,
27-Apr-1994.) |