Description: Define the subclass
relationship. Exercise 9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18.
For example, {1, 2} ⊆ {1, 2, 3} (ex-ss 28134). Note that
𝐴
⊆ 𝐴 (proved in
ssid 3988). Contrast this relationship with the
relationship 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 (as will be defined in df-pss 3953). For a more
traditional definition, but requiring a dummy variable, see dfss2 3954.
Other possible definitions are given by dfss3 3955, dfss4 4234, sspss 4075,
ssequn1 4155, ssequn2 4158, sseqin2 4191, and ssdif0 4322.
We prefer the label "ss" ("subset") for ⊆, despite the fact that it
applies to classes. It is much more common to refer to this as the subset
relation than subclass, especially since most of the time the arguments
are in fact sets (and for pragmatic reasons we don't want to need to use
different operations for sets). The way set.mm is set up, many things are
technically classes despite morally (and provably) being sets, like 1
(cf. df-1 10534 and 1ex 10626) or ℝ
( cf. df-r 10536 and reex 10617). This has to
do with the fact that there are no "set expressions": classes
are
expressions but there are only set variables in set.mm (cf.
https://us.metamath.org/downloads/grammar-ambiguity.txt 10617). This is why
we use ⊆ both for subclass relations and for
subset relations and
call it "subset". (Contributed by NM,
27-Apr-1994.) |