Description: Define the subclass
relationship. Exercise 9 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 18.
For example, {1, 2} ⊆ {1, 2, 3} (ex-ss 28464). Note that
𝐴
⊆ 𝐴 (proved in
ssid 3909). Contrast this relationship with the
relationship 𝐴 ⊊ 𝐵 (as will be defined in df-pss 3872). For a more
traditional definition, but requiring a dummy variable, see dfss2 3873.
Other possible definitions are given by dfss3 3875, dfss4 4159, sspss 4000,
ssequn1 4080, ssequn2 4083, sseqin2 4116, and ssdif0 4264.
We prefer the label "ss" ("subset") for ⊆, despite the fact that it
applies to classes. It is much more common to refer to this as the subset
relation than subclass, especially since most of the time the arguments
are in fact sets (and for pragmatic reasons we don't want to need to use
different operations for sets). The way set.mm is set up, many things are
technically classes despite morally (and provably) being sets, like 1
(cf. df-1 10702 and 1ex 10794) or ℝ
( cf. df-r 10704 and reex 10785). This has to
do with the fact that there are no "set expressions": classes
are
expressions but there are only set variables in set.mm (cf.
https://us.metamath.org/downloads/grammar-ambiguity.txt 10785). This is why
we use ⊆ both for subclass relations and for
subset relations and
call it "subset". (Contributed by NM,
27-Apr-1994.) |