Theorem 3orel13 33660

Description: Elimination of two disjuncts in a triple disjunction. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Jun-2011.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
3orel13	⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜒) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) → 𝜓))

Proof of Theorem 3orel13

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		3orel3 1485	. 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝜒 → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) → (𝜑 ∨ 𝜓)))
2		orel1 886	. 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓) → 𝜓))
3	1, 2	sylan9r 509	1 ⊢ ((¬ 𝜑 ∧ ¬ 𝜒) → ((𝜑 ∨ 𝜓 ∨ 𝜒) → 𝜓))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 396   ∨ wo 844   ∨ w3o 1085

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-3or 1087

This theorem is referenced by:  soseq  33803  nodenselem8  33894