Theorem bj-nnfbd0 36983

Description: If two formulas are equivalent, then nonfreeness of a variable in one of them is equivalent to nonfreeness in the other, deduction form. The antecedent of the conclusion is in the "strong necessity" modality of modal logic (see also bj-nnftht 36980) in order not to require sp 2191 (modal T). See bj-nnfbi 36982. (Contributed by BJ, 21-Mar-2026.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
bj-nnfbd0.1	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bj-nnfbd0	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥𝜑) → (Ⅎ'𝑥𝜓 ↔ Ⅎ'𝑥𝜒))

Proof of Theorem bj-nnfbd0

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bj-nnfbd0.1	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
2	1	alimi 1813	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ∀𝑥(𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))
3		bj-nnfbi 36982	. 2 ⊢ (((𝜓 ↔ 𝜒) ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) → (Ⅎ'𝑥𝜓 ↔ Ⅎ'𝑥𝜒))
4	1, 2, 3	syl2an 597	1 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥𝜑) → (Ⅎ'𝑥𝜓 ↔ Ⅎ'𝑥𝜒))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395  ∀wal 1540  Ⅎ'wnnf 36963

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-ex 1782  df-bj-nnf 36964

This theorem is referenced by:  bj-nnfbd  37006