Home | Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 371 of 466) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | Metamath Proof Explorer
(1-29289) |
Hilbert Space Explorer
(29290-30812) |
Users' Mathboxes
(30813-46532) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | islshpsm 37001* | Hyperplane properties expressed with subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ∈ 𝐻 ↔ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑈 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑈 ⊕ (𝑁‘{𝑣})) = 𝑉))) | ||
Theorem | lshplss 37002 | A hyperplane is a subspace. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) | ||
Theorem | lshpne 37003 | A hyperplane is not equal to the vector space. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ≠ 𝑉) | ||
Theorem | lshpnel 37004 | A hyperplane's generating vector does not belong to the hyperplane. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ⊕ (𝑁‘{𝑋})) = 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈) | ||
Theorem | lshpnelb 37005 | The subspace sum of a hyperplane and the span of an element equals the vector space iff the element is not in the hyperplane. (Contributed by NM, 2-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ (𝑈 ⊕ (𝑁‘{𝑋})) = 𝑉)) | ||
Theorem | lshpnel2N 37006 | Condition that determines a hyperplane. (Contributed by NM, 3-Oct-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ≠ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ∈ 𝐻 ↔ (𝑈 ⊕ (𝑁‘{𝑋})) = 𝑉)) | ||
Theorem | lshpne0 37007 | The member of the span in the hyperplane definition does not belong to the hyperplane. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jul-2014.) (Proof shortened by AV, 19-Jul-2022.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ⊕ (𝑁‘{𝑋})) = 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 0 ) | ||
Theorem | lshpdisj 37008 | A hyperplane and the span in the hyperplane definition are disjoint. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jul-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ⊕ (𝑁‘{𝑋})) = 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ∩ (𝑁‘{𝑋})) = { 0 }) | ||
Theorem | lshpcmp 37009 | If two hyperplanes are comparable, they are equal. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ⊆ 𝑈 ↔ 𝑇 = 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | lshpinN 37010 | The intersection of two different hyperplanes is not a hyperplane. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐻) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) ∈ 𝐻 ↔ 𝑇 = 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | lsatset 37011* | The set of all 1-dim subspaces (atoms) of a left module or left vector space. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 → 𝐴 = ran (𝑣 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ { 0 }) ↦ (𝑁‘{𝑣}))) | ||
Theorem | islsat 37012* | The predicate "is a 1-dim subspace (atom)" (of a left module or left vector space). (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 → (𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ { 0 })𝑈 = (𝑁‘{𝑥}))) | ||
Theorem | lsatlspsn2 37013 | The span of a nonzero singleton is an atom. TODO: make this obsolete and use lsatlspsn 37014 instead? (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 0 ) → (𝑁‘{𝑋}) ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | lsatlspsn 37014 | The span of a nonzero singleton is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ { 0 })) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘{𝑋}) ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | islsati 37015* | A 1-dim subspace (atom) (of a left module or left vector space) equals the span of some vector. (Contributed by NM, 1-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑉 𝑈 = (𝑁‘{𝑣})) | ||
Theorem | lsateln0 37016* | A 1-dim subspace (atom) (of a left module or left vector space) contains a nonzero vector. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑈 𝑣 ≠ 0 ) | ||
Theorem | lsatlss 37017 | The set of 1-dim subspaces is a set of subspaces. (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑆) | ||
Theorem | lsatlssel 37018 | An atom is a subspace. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) | ||
Theorem | lsatssv 37019 | An atom is a set of vectors. (Contributed by NM, 27-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ⊆ 𝑉) | ||
Theorem | lsatn0 37020 | A 1-dim subspace (atom) of a left module or left vector space is nonzero. (atne0 30716 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-2014.) |
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ≠ { 0 }) | ||
Theorem | lsatspn0 37021 | The span of a vector is an atom iff the vector is nonzero. (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑁‘{𝑋}) ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝑋 ≠ 0 )) | ||
Theorem | lsator0sp 37022 | The span of a vector is either an atom or the zero subspace. (Contributed by NM, 15-Mar-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑁‘{𝑋}) ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑁‘{𝑋}) = { 0 })) | ||
Theorem | lsatssn0 37023 | A subspace (or any class) including an atom is nonzero. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ⊆ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ≠ { 0 }) | ||
Theorem | lsatcmp 37024 | If two atoms are comparable, they are equal. (atsseq 30718 analog.) TODO: can lspsncmp 20387 shorten this? (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ⊆ 𝑈 ↔ 𝑇 = 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | lsatcmp2 37025 | If an atom is included in at-most an atom, they are equal. More general version of lsatcmp 37024. TODO: can lspsncmp 20387 shorten this? (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2015.) |
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑈 = { 0 })) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ⊆ 𝑈 ↔ 𝑇 = 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | lsatel 37026 | A nonzero vector in an atom determines the atom. (Contributed by NM, 25-Aug-2014.) |
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 0 ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = (𝑁‘{𝑋})) | ||
Theorem | lsatelbN 37027 | A nonzero vector in an atom determines the atom. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ { 0 })) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 ↔ 𝑈 = (𝑁‘{𝑋}))) | ||
Theorem | lsat2el 37028 | Two atoms sharing a nonzero vector are equal. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2015.) |
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 0 ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑃) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑄) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 = 𝑄) | ||
Theorem | lsmsat 37029* | Convert comparison of atom with sum of subspaces to a comparison to sum with atom. (elpaddatiN 37826 analog.) TODO: any way to shorten this? (Contributed by NM, 15-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ≠ { 0 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ⊆ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ⊆ 𝑇 ∧ 𝑄 ⊆ (𝑝 ⊕ 𝑈))) | ||
Theorem | lsatfixedN 37030* | Show equality with the span of the sum of two vectors, one of which (𝑋) is fixed in advance. Compare lspfixed 20399. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ≠ (𝑁‘{𝑋})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ≠ (𝑁‘{𝑌})) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ⊆ (𝑁‘{𝑋, 𝑌})) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘{𝑌}) ∖ { 0 })𝑄 = (𝑁‘{(𝑋 + 𝑧)})) | ||
Theorem | lsmsatcv 37031 | Subspace sum has the covering property (using spans of singletons to represent atoms). Similar to Exercise 5 of [Kalmbach] p. 153. (spansncvi 30023 analog.) Explicit atom version of lsmcv 20412. (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑇 ⊊ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑄)) → 𝑈 = (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑄)) | ||
Theorem | lssatomic 37032* | The lattice of subspaces is atomic, i.e. any nonzero element is greater than or equal to some atom. (shatomici 30729 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ≠ { 0 }) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 𝑞 ⊆ 𝑈) | ||
Theorem | lssats 37033* | The lattice of subspaces is atomistic, i.e. any element is the supremum of its atoms. Part of proof of Theorem 16.9 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 70. Hypothesis (shatomistici 30732 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝑈 = (𝑁‘∪ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑈})) | ||
Theorem | lpssat 37034* | Two subspaces in a proper subset relationship imply the existence of an atom less than or equal to one but not the other. (chpssati 30734 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊊ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑞 ⊆ 𝑈 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ⊆ 𝑇)) | ||
Theorem | lrelat 37035* | Subspaces are relatively atomic. Remark 2 of [Kalmbach] p. 149. (chrelati 30735 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊊ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑇 ⊊ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑞) ∧ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑞) ⊆ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | lssatle 37036* | The ordering of two subspaces is determined by the atoms under them. (chrelat3 30742 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 29-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ⊆ 𝑈 ↔ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ⊆ 𝑇 → 𝑝 ⊆ 𝑈))) | ||
Theorem | lssat 37037* | Two subspaces in a proper subset relationship imply the existence of a 1-dim subspace less than or equal to one but not the other. (chpssati 30734 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 9-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑉 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑈 ⊊ 𝑉) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ⊆ 𝑉 ∧ ¬ 𝑝 ⊆ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | islshpat 37038* | Hyperplane properties expressed with subspace sum and an atom. TODO: can proof be shortened? Seems long for a simple variation of islshpsm 37001. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ∈ 𝐻 ↔ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑈 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑞) = 𝑉))) | ||
Syntax | clcv 37039 | Extend class notation with the covering relation for a left module or left vector space. |
class ⋖L | ||
Definition | df-lcv 37040* | Define the covering relation for subspaces of a left vector space. Similar to Definition 3.2.18 of [PtakPulmannova] p. 68. Ptak/Pulmannova's notation 𝐴( ⋖L ‘𝑊)𝐵 is read "𝐵 covers 𝐴 " or "𝐴 is covered by 𝐵 " , and it means that 𝐵 is larger than 𝐴 and there is nothing in between. See lcvbr 37042 for binary relation. (df-cv 30650 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ ⋖L = (𝑤 ∈ V ↦ {〈𝑡, 𝑢〉 ∣ ((𝑡 ∈ (LSubSp‘𝑤) ∧ 𝑢 ∈ (LSubSp‘𝑤)) ∧ (𝑡 ⊊ 𝑢 ∧ ¬ ∃𝑠 ∈ (LSubSp‘𝑤)(𝑡 ⊊ 𝑠 ∧ 𝑠 ⊊ 𝑢)))}) | ||
Theorem | lcvfbr 37041* | The covers relation for a left vector space (or a left module). (Contributed by NM, 7-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = {〈𝑡, 𝑢〉 ∣ ((𝑡 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑡 ⊊ 𝑢 ∧ ¬ ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑡 ⊊ 𝑠 ∧ 𝑠 ⊊ 𝑢)))}) | ||
Theorem | lcvbr 37042* | The covers relation for a left vector space (or a left module). (cvbr 30653 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇𝐶𝑈 ↔ (𝑇 ⊊ 𝑈 ∧ ¬ ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑇 ⊊ 𝑠 ∧ 𝑠 ⊊ 𝑈)))) | ||
Theorem | lcvbr2 37043* | The covers relation for a left vector space (or a left module). (cvbr2 30654 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇𝐶𝑈 ↔ (𝑇 ⊊ 𝑈 ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ((𝑇 ⊊ 𝑠 ∧ 𝑠 ⊆ 𝑈) → 𝑠 = 𝑈)))) | ||
Theorem | lcvbr3 37044* | The covers relation for a left vector space (or a left module). (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇𝐶𝑈 ↔ (𝑇 ⊊ 𝑈 ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝑆 ((𝑇 ⊆ 𝑠 ∧ 𝑠 ⊆ 𝑈) → (𝑠 = 𝑇 ∨ 𝑠 = 𝑈))))) | ||
Theorem | lcvpss 37045 | The covers relation implies proper subset. (cvpss 30656 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇𝐶𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊊ 𝑈) | ||
Theorem | lcvnbtwn 37046 | The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. (cvnbtwn 30657 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅𝐶𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑅 ⊊ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑈 ⊊ 𝑇)) | ||
Theorem | lcvntr 37047 | The covers relation is not transitive. (cvntr 30663 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅𝐶𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇𝐶𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑅𝐶𝑈) | ||
Theorem | lcvnbtwn2 37048 | The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. (cvnbtwn2 30658 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅𝐶𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊊ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ 𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = 𝑇) | ||
Theorem | lcvnbtwn3 37049 | The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. (cvnbtwn3 30659 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅𝐶𝑇) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊊ 𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = 𝑅) | ||
Theorem | lsmcv2 37050 | Subspace sum has the covering property (using spans of singletons to represent atoms). Proposition 1(ii) of [Kalmbach] p. 153. (spansncv2 30664 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ (𝑁‘{𝑋}) ⊆ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈𝐶(𝑈 ⊕ (𝑁‘{𝑋}))) | ||
Theorem | lcvat 37051* | If a subspace covers another, it equals the other joined with some atom. This is a consequence of relative atomicity. (cvati 30737 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇𝐶𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑞) = 𝑈) | ||
Theorem | lsatcv0 37052 | An atom covers the zero subspace. (atcv0 30713 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → { 0 }𝐶𝑄) | ||
Theorem | lsatcveq0 37053 | A subspace covered by an atom must be the zero subspace. (atcveq0 30719 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈𝐶𝑄 ↔ 𝑈 = { 0 })) | ||
Theorem | lsat0cv 37054 | A subspace is an atom iff it covers the zero subspace. This could serve as an alternate definition of an atom. TODO: this is a quick-and-dirty proof that could probably be more efficient. (Contributed by NM, 14-Mar-2015.) |
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ { 0 }𝐶𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | lcvexchlem1 37055 | Lemma for lcvexch 37060. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ⊊ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈) ↔ (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) ⊊ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | lcvexchlem2 37056 | Lemma for lcvexch 37060. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈) ⊆ 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑅 ⊕ 𝑇) ∩ 𝑈) = 𝑅) | ||
Theorem | lcvexchlem3 37057 | Lemma for lcvexch 37060. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑅 ∩ 𝑈) ⊕ 𝑇) = 𝑅) | ||
Theorem | lcvexchlem4 37058 | Lemma for lcvexch 37060. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇𝐶(𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈)𝐶𝑈) | ||
Theorem | lcvexchlem5 37059 | Lemma for lcvexch 37060. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑇 ∩ 𝑈)𝐶𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇𝐶(𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | lcvexch 37060 | Subspaces satisfy the exchange axiom. Lemma 7.5 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31. (cvexchi 30740 analog.) TODO: combine some lemmas. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑇 ∩ 𝑈)𝐶𝑈 ↔ 𝑇𝐶(𝑇 ⊕ 𝑈))) | ||
Theorem | lcvp 37061 | Covering property of Definition 7.4 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31 and its converse. (cvp 30746 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑈 ∩ 𝑄) = { 0 } ↔ 𝑈𝐶(𝑈 ⊕ 𝑄))) | ||
Theorem | lcv1 37062 | Covering property of a subspace plus an atom. (chcv1 30726 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝑄 ⊆ 𝑈 ↔ 𝑈𝐶(𝑈 ⊕ 𝑄))) | ||
Theorem | lcv2 37063 | Covering property of a subspace plus an atom. (chcv2 30727 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ⊊ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑄) ↔ 𝑈𝐶(𝑈 ⊕ 𝑄))) | ||
Theorem | lsatexch 37064 | The atom exchange property. Proposition 1(i) of [Kalmbach] p. 140. A version of this theorem was originally proved by Hermann Grassmann in 1862. (atexch 30752 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ⊆ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ∩ 𝑄) = { 0 }) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑄)) | ||
Theorem | lsatnle 37065 | The meet of a subspace and an incomparable atom is the zero subspace. (atnssm0 30747 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (¬ 𝑄 ⊆ 𝑈 ↔ (𝑈 ∩ 𝑄) = { 0 })) | ||
Theorem | lsatnem0 37066 | The meet of distinct atoms is the zero subspace. (atnemeq0 30748 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ↔ (𝑄 ∩ 𝑅) = { 0 })) | ||
Theorem | lsatexch1 37067 | The atom exch1ange property. (hlatexch1 37416 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ⊆ (𝑆 ⊕ 𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ≠ 𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ⊆ (𝑆 ⊕ 𝑄)) | ||
Theorem | lsatcv0eq 37068 | If the sum of two atoms cover the zero subspace, they are equal. (atcv0eq 30750 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ({ 0 }𝐶(𝑄 ⊕ 𝑅) ↔ 𝑄 = 𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | lsatcv1 37069 | Two atoms covering the zero subspace are equal. (atcv1 30751 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈𝐶(𝑄 ⊕ 𝑅)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 = { 0 } ↔ 𝑄 = 𝑅)) | ||
Theorem | lsatcvatlem 37070 | Lemma for lsatcvat 37071. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ≠ { 0 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊊ (𝑄 ⊕ 𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑄 ⊆ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | lsatcvat 37071 | A nonzero subspace less than the sum of two atoms is an atom. (atcvati 30757 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ≠ { 0 }) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊊ (𝑄 ⊕ 𝑅)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | lsatcvat2 37072 | A subspace covered by the sum of two distinct atoms is an atom. (atcvat2i 30758 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ≠ 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈𝐶(𝑄 ⊕ 𝑅)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | lsatcvat3 37073 | A condition implying that a certain subspace is an atom. Part of Lemma 3.2.20 of [PtakPulmannova] p. 68. (atcvat3i 30767 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ≠ 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ⊆ (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑅)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ∩ (𝑄 ⊕ 𝑅)) ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | islshpcv 37074 | Hyperplane properties expressed with covers relation. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ∈ 𝐻 ↔ (𝑈 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑈𝐶𝑉))) | ||
Theorem | l1cvpat 37075 | A subspace covered by the set of all vectors, when summed with an atom not under it, equals the set of all vectors. (1cvrjat 37496 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈𝐶𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑄 ⊆ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈 ⊕ 𝑄) = 𝑉) | ||
Theorem | l1cvat 37076 | Create an atom under an element covered by the lattice unit. Part of proof of Lemma B in [Crawley] p. 112. (1cvrat 37497 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖L ‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ≠ 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈𝐶𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑄 ⊆ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑄 ⊕ 𝑅) ∩ 𝑈) ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Theorem | lshpat 37077 | Create an atom under a hyperplane. Part of proof of Lemma B in [Crawley] p. 112. (lhpat 38064 analog.) TODO: This changes 𝑈𝐶𝑉 in l1cvpat 37075 and l1cvat 37076 to 𝑈 ∈ 𝐻, which in turn change 𝑈 ∈ 𝐻 in islshpcv 37074 to 𝑈𝐶𝑉, with a couple of conversions of span to atom. Seems convoluted. Would a direct proof be better? (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐻 = (LSHyp‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐴 = (LSAtoms‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LVec) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ≠ 𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑄 ⊆ 𝑈) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑄 ⊕ 𝑅) ∩ 𝑈) ∈ 𝐴) | ||
Syntax | clfn 37078 | Extend class notation with all linear functionals of a left module or left vector space. |
class LFnl | ||
Definition | df-lfl 37079* | Define the set of all linear functionals (maps from vectors to the ring) of a left module or left vector space. (Contributed by NM, 15-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ LFnl = (𝑤 ∈ V ↦ {𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑤)) ↑m (Base‘𝑤)) ∣ ∀𝑟 ∈ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑤))∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑤)∀𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑤)(𝑓‘((𝑟( ·𝑠 ‘𝑤)𝑥)(+g‘𝑤)𝑦)) = ((𝑟(.r‘(Scalar‘𝑤))(𝑓‘𝑥))(+g‘(Scalar‘𝑤))(𝑓‘𝑦))}) | ||
Theorem | lflset 37080* | The set of linear functionals in a left module or left vector space. (Contributed by NM, 15-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝐷) & ⊢ × = (.r‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (LFnl‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 → 𝐹 = {𝑓 ∈ (𝐾 ↑m 𝑉) ∣ ∀𝑟 ∈ 𝐾 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑓‘((𝑟 · 𝑥) + 𝑦)) = ((𝑟 × (𝑓‘𝑥)) ⨣ (𝑓‘𝑦))}) | ||
Theorem | islfl 37081* | The predicate "is a linear functional". (Contributed by NM, 15-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝐷) & ⊢ × = (.r‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (LFnl‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 → (𝐺 ∈ 𝐹 ↔ (𝐺:𝑉⟶𝐾 ∧ ∀𝑟 ∈ 𝐾 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑉 (𝐺‘((𝑟 · 𝑥) + 𝑦)) = ((𝑟 × (𝐺‘𝑥)) ⨣ (𝐺‘𝑦))))) | ||
Theorem | lfli 37082 | Property of a linear functional. (lnfnli 30411 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 16-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝐷) & ⊢ × = (.r‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (LFnl‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ 𝑍 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝐺‘((𝑅 · 𝑋) + 𝑌)) = ((𝑅 × (𝐺‘𝑋)) ⨣ (𝐺‘𝑌))) | ||
Theorem | islfld 37083* | Properties that determine a linear functional. TODO: use this in place of islfl 37081 when it shortens the proof. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → + = (+g‘𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (Scalar‘𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ⨣ = (+g‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → × = (.r‘𝐷)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (LFnl‘𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝑉⟶𝐾) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑟 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝐺‘((𝑟 · 𝑥) + 𝑦)) = ((𝑟 × (𝐺‘𝑥)) ⨣ (𝐺‘𝑦))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐹) | ||
Theorem | lflf 37084 | A linear functional is a function from vectors to scalars. (lnfnfi 30412 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 15-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (LFnl‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐹) → 𝐺:𝑉⟶𝐾) | ||
Theorem | lflcl 37085 | A linear functional value is a scalar. (Contributed by NM, 15-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (LFnl‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐺‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐾) | ||
Theorem | lfl0 37086 | A linear functional is zero at the zero vector. (lnfn0i 30413 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 16-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑍 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (LFnl‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐹) → (𝐺‘𝑍) = 0 ) | ||
Theorem | lfladd 37087 | Property of a linear functional. (lnfnaddi 30414 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (LFnl‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝐺‘(𝑋 + 𝑌)) = ((𝐺‘𝑋) ⨣ (𝐺‘𝑌))) | ||
Theorem | lflsub 37088 | Property of a linear functional. (lnfnaddi 30414 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (-g‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (LFnl‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝐺‘(𝑋 − 𝑌)) = ((𝐺‘𝑋)𝑀(𝐺‘𝑌))) | ||
Theorem | lflmul 37089 | Property of a linear functional. (lnfnmuli 30415 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 16-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ × = (.r‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (LFnl‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝐺‘(𝑅 · 𝑋)) = (𝑅 × (𝐺‘𝑋))) | ||
Theorem | lfl0f 37090 | The zero function is a functional. (Contributed by NM, 16-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (LFnl‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → (𝑉 × { 0 }) ∈ 𝐹) | ||
Theorem | lfl1 37091* | A nonzero functional has a value of 1 at some argument. (Contributed by NM, 16-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐷) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (LFnl‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LVec ∧ 𝐺 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐺 ≠ (𝑉 × { 0 })) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 (𝐺‘𝑥) = 1 ) | ||
Theorem | lfladdcl 37092 | Closure of addition of two functionals. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (LFnl‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘f + 𝐻) ∈ 𝐹) | ||
Theorem | lfladdcom 37093 | Commutativity of functional addition. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (LFnl‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘f + 𝐻) = (𝐻 ∘f + 𝐺)) | ||
Theorem | lfladdass 37094 | Associativity of functional addition. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (LFnl‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐺 ∘f + 𝐻) ∘f + 𝐼) = (𝐺 ∘f + (𝐻 ∘f + 𝐼))) | ||
Theorem | lfladd0l 37095 | Functional addition with the zero functional. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (LFnl‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑉 × { 0 }) ∘f + 𝐺) = 𝐺) | ||
Theorem | lflnegcl 37096* | Closure of the negative of a functional. (This is specialized for the purpose of proving ldualgrp 37167, and we do not define a general operation here.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (invg‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ (𝐼‘(𝐺‘𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (LFnl‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ 𝐹) | ||
Theorem | lflnegl 37097* | A functional plus its negative is the zero functional. (This is specialized for the purpose of proving ldualgrp 37167, and we do not define a general operation here.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (invg‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ↦ (𝐼‘(𝐺‘𝑥))) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (LFnl‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐹) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁 ∘f + 𝐺) = (𝑉 × { 0 })) | ||
Theorem | lflvscl 37098 | Closure of a scalar product with a functional. Note that this is the scalar product for a right vector space with the scalar after the vector; reversing these fails closure. (Contributed by NM, 9-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐷 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐷) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝐷) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (LFnl‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘f · (𝑉 × {𝑅})) ∈ 𝐹) | ||
Theorem | lflvsdi1 37099 | Distributive law for (right vector space) scalar product of functionals. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (LFnl‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐺 ∘f + 𝐻) ∘f · (𝑉 × {𝑋})) = ((𝐺 ∘f · (𝑉 × {𝑋})) ∘f + (𝐻 ∘f · (𝑉 × {𝑋})))) | ||
Theorem | lflvsdi2 37100 | Reverse distributive law for (right vector space) scalar product of functionals. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2014.) |
⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (LFnl‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘f · ((𝑉 × {𝑋}) ∘f + (𝑉 × {𝑌}))) = ((𝐺 ∘f · (𝑉 × {𝑋})) ∘f + (𝐺 ∘f · (𝑉 × {𝑌})))) |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |