MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  exel Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem exel 5402
Description: There exist two sets, one a member of the other.

This theorem looks similar to el 5406, but its meaning is different. It only depends on the axioms ax-mp 5 to ax-4 1842, ax-6 2000, and ax-pr 5391. This theorem does not exclude that these two sets could actually be one single set containing itself. That two different sets exist is proved by exexneq 5403. (Contributed by SN, 23-Dec-2024.)

Assertion
Ref Expression
exel ∃𝑦∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Proof of Theorem exel
Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 ax-pr 5391 . 2 ∃𝑦∀𝑥((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦)
2 ax6ev 2002 . . . 4 ∃𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧
3 pm2.07 916 . . . 4 (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 = 𝑧 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑧))
42, 3eximii 1870 . . 3 ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑧)
5 exim 1867 . . 3 (∀𝑥((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦) → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦))
64, 5mpi 21 . 2 (∀𝑥((𝑥 = 𝑧 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑧) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦) → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦)
71, 6eximii 1870 1 ∃𝑦∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦
Colors of variables:    wff setvar class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∨ wo 861  ∀wal 1568  ∃wex 1812
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-6 2000  ax-pr 5391
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-or 862  df-ex 1813
This theorem is used by:  exexneq  5403
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator