MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  exel Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem exel 5416
Description: There exist two sets, one a member of the other.

This theorem looks similar to el 5420, but its meaning is different. It only depends on the axioms ax-mp 5 to ax-4 1836, ax-6 1994, and ax-pr 5405. This theorem does not exclude that these two sets could actually be one single set containing itself. That two different sets exist is proved by exexneq 5417. (Contributed by SN, 23-Dec-2024.)

Assertion
Ref Expression
exel 𝑦𝑥 𝑥𝑦
Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Proof of Theorem exel
Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 ax-pr 5405 . 2 𝑦𝑥((𝑥 = 𝑧𝑥 = 𝑧) → 𝑥𝑦)
2 ax6ev 1996 . . . 4 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧
3 pm2.07 915 . . . 4 (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 = 𝑧𝑥 = 𝑧))
42, 3eximii 1864 . . 3 𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧𝑥 = 𝑧)
5 exim 1861 . . 3 (∀𝑥((𝑥 = 𝑧𝑥 = 𝑧) → 𝑥𝑦) → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧𝑥 = 𝑧) → ∃𝑥 𝑥𝑦))
64, 5mpi 21 . 2 (∀𝑥((𝑥 = 𝑧𝑥 = 𝑧) → 𝑥𝑦) → ∃𝑥 𝑥𝑦)
71, 6eximii 1864 1 𝑦𝑥 𝑥𝑦
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wo 860  wal 1565  wex 1806
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1822  ax-4 1836  ax-6 1994  ax-pr 5405
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-or 861  df-ex 1807
This theorem is referenced by:  exexneq  5417
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator