MPE Home Metamath Proof Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  MPE Home  >  Th. List  >  exel Structured version   Visualization version   GIF version

Theorem exel 5401
Description: There exist two sets, one a member of the other.

This theorem looks similar to el 5405, but its meaning is different. It only depends on the axioms ax-mp 5 to ax-4 1829, ax-6 1987, and ax-pr 5390. This theorem does not exclude that these two sets could actually be one single set containing itself. That two different sets exist is proved by exexneq 5402. (Contributed by SN, 23-Dec-2024.)

Assertion
Ref Expression
exel 𝑦𝑥 𝑥𝑦
Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦

Proof of Theorem exel
Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 ax-pr 5390 . 2 𝑦𝑥((𝑥 = 𝑧𝑥 = 𝑧) → 𝑥𝑦)
2 ax6ev 1989 . . . 4 𝑥 𝑥 = 𝑧
3 pm2.07 913 . . . 4 (𝑥 = 𝑧 → (𝑥 = 𝑧𝑥 = 𝑧))
42, 3eximii 1857 . . 3 𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧𝑥 = 𝑧)
5 exim 1854 . . 3 (∀𝑥((𝑥 = 𝑧𝑥 = 𝑧) → 𝑥𝑦) → (∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝑧𝑥 = 𝑧) → ∃𝑥 𝑥𝑦))
64, 5mpi 20 . 2 (∀𝑥((𝑥 = 𝑧𝑥 = 𝑧) → 𝑥𝑦) → ∃𝑥 𝑥𝑦)
71, 6eximii 1857 1 𝑦𝑥 𝑥𝑦
Colors of variables: wff setvar class
Syntax hints:  wi 4  wo 858  wal 1558  wex 1799
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1815  ax-4 1829  ax-6 1987  ax-pr 5390
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-or 859  df-ex 1800
This theorem is referenced by:  exexneq  5402
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator