P. 55 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 5401-5500   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	copsex2g 5401*	Implicit substitution inference for ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.) Use a similar proof to copsex4g 5403 to reduce axiom usage. (Revised by SN, 1-Sep-2024.)
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	copsex2gOLD 5402*	Obsolete version of copsex2g 5401 as of 1-Sep-2024. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	copsex4g 5403*	An implicit substitution inference for 2 ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1995.)
⊢ (((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝑤 = 𝐷)) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝑆)) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧∃𝑤((⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ = ⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩) ∧ 𝜑) ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	0nelop 5404	A property of ordered pairs. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩
Theorem	opwo0id 5405	An ordered pair is equal to the ordered pair without the empty set. This is because no ordered pair contains the empty set. (Contributed by AV, 15-Nov-2021.)
⊢ ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ = (⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∖ {∅})
Theorem	opeqex 5406	Equivalence of existence implied by equality of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2008.)
⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ → ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ V ∧ 𝐷 ∈ V)))
Theorem	oteqex2 5407	Equivalence of existence implied by equality of ordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, 𝐶⟩ = ⟨⟨𝑅, 𝑆⟩, 𝑇⟩ → (𝐶 ∈ V ↔ 𝑇 ∈ V))
Theorem	oteqex 5408	Equivalence of existence implied by equality of ordered triples. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (⟨⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, 𝐶⟩ = ⟨⟨𝑅, 𝑆⟩, 𝑇⟩ → ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V ∧ 𝐶 ∈ V) ↔ (𝑅 ∈ V ∧ 𝑆 ∈ V ∧ 𝑇 ∈ V)))
Theorem	opcom 5409	An ordered pair commutes iff its members are equal. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2009.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ⟨𝐵, 𝐴⟩ ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)
Theorem	moop2 5410*	"At most one" property of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 11-Apr-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ∃*𝑥 𝐴 = ⟨𝐵, 𝑥⟩
Theorem	opeqsng 5411	Equivalence for an ordered pair equal to a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2008.) (Revised by AV, 15-Jul-2022.) (Avoid depending on this detail.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = {𝐶} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 = {𝐴})))
Theorem	opeqsn 5412	Equivalence for an ordered pair equal to a singleton. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2008.) (Revised by AV, 15-Jul-2022.) (Avoid depending on this detail.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = {𝐶} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 = {𝐴}))
Theorem	opeqpr 5413	Equivalence for an ordered pair equal to an unordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jun-2008.) (Avoid depending on this detail.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = {𝐶, 𝐷} ↔ ((𝐶 = {𝐴} ∧ 𝐷 = {𝐴, 𝐵}) ∨ (𝐶 = {𝐴, 𝐵} ∧ 𝐷 = {𝐴})))
Theorem	snopeqop 5414	Equivalence for an ordered pair equal to a singleton of an ordered pair. (Contributed by AV, 18-Sep-2020.) (Revised by AV, 15-Jul-2022.) (Avoid depending on this detail.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ({⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩} = ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷 ∧ 𝐶 = {𝐴}))
Theorem	propeqop 5415	Equivalence for an ordered pair equal to a pair of ordered pairs. (Contributed by AV, 18-Sep-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Jun-2022.) (Avoid depending on this detail.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐸 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ({⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩} = ⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩ ↔ ((𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐸 = {𝐴}) ∧ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐹 = {𝐴, 𝐷}) ∨ (𝐴 = 𝐷 ∧ 𝐹 = {𝐴, 𝐵}))))
Theorem	propssopi 5416	If a pair of ordered pairs is a subset of an ordered pair, their first components are equal. (Contributed by AV, 20-Sep-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 16-Jun-2022.) (Avoid depending on this detail.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐸 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ({⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩, ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩} ⊆ ⟨𝐸, 𝐹⟩ → 𝐴 = 𝐶)
Theorem	snopeqopsnid 5417	Equivalence for an ordered pair of two identical singletons equal to a singleton of an ordered pair. (Contributed by AV, 24-Sep-2020.) (Revised by AV, 15-Jul-2022.) (Avoid depending on this detail.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝐴, 𝐴⟩} = ⟨{𝐴}, {𝐴}⟩
Theorem	mosubopt 5418*	"At most one" remains true inside ordered pair quantification. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2007.)
⊢ (∀𝑦∀𝑧∃*𝑥𝜑 → ∃*𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝐴 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	mosubop 5419*	"At most one" remains true inside ordered pair quantification. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.)
⊢ ∃*𝑥𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ ∃*𝑥∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝐴 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝜑)
Theorem	euop2 5420*	Transfer existential uniqueness to second member of an ordered pair. (Contributed by NM, 10-Apr-2004.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (∃!𝑥∃𝑦(𝑥 = ⟨𝐴, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑) ↔ ∃!𝑦𝜑)
Theorem	euotd 5421*	Prove existential uniqueness for an ordered triple. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ↔ (𝑎 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝑐 = 𝐶)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥∃𝑎∃𝑏∃𝑐(𝑥 = ⟨𝑎, 𝑏, 𝑐⟩ ∧ 𝜓))
Theorem	opthwiener 5422	Justification theorem for the ordered pair definition in Norbert Wiener, A simplification of the logic of relations, Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 1914, vol. 17, pp.387-390. It is also shown as a definition in [Enderton] p. 36 and as Exercise 4.8(b) of [Mendelson] p. 230. It is meaningful only for classes that exist as sets (i.e., are not proper classes). See df-op 4565 for other ordered pair definitions. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2003.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ({{{𝐴}, ∅}, {{𝐵}}} = {{{𝐶}, ∅}, {{𝐷}}} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))
Theorem	uniop 5423	The union of an ordered pair. Theorem 65 of [Suppes] p. 39. (Contributed by NM, 17-Aug-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ∪ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = {𝐴, 𝐵}
Theorem	uniopel 5424	Ordered pair membership is inherited by class union. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝐶 → ∪ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ ∪ 𝐶)
Theorem	opthhausdorff 5425	Justification theorem for the ordered pair definition of Felix Hausdorff in "Grundzüge der Mengenlehre" ("Basics of Set Theory"), 1914, p. 32: ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩H = {{𝐴, 𝑂}, {𝐵, 𝑇}}. Hausdorff used 1 and 2 instead of 𝑂 and 𝑇, but actually, any two different fixed sets will do (e.g., 𝑂 = ∅ and 𝑇 = {∅}, see 0nep0 5275). Furthermore, Hausdorff demanded that 𝑂 and 𝑇 are both different from 𝐴 as well as 𝐵, which is actually not necessary in full extent (𝐴 ≠ 𝑇 is not required). This definition is meaningful only for classes 𝐴 and 𝐵 that exist as sets (i.e., are not proper classes): If 𝐴 and 𝐶 were different proper classes (𝐴 ≠ 𝐶), then {{𝐴, 𝑂}, {𝐵, 𝑇}} = {{𝐶, 𝑂}, {𝐷, 𝑇} ↔ {{𝑂}, {𝐵, 𝑇}} = {{𝑂}, {𝐷, 𝑇} is true if 𝐵 = 𝐷, but (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷) would be false. See df-op 4565 for other ordered pair definitions. (Contributed by AV, 14-Jun-2022.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ≠ 𝑂    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ≠ 𝑂    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ≠ 𝑇    &   ⊢ 𝑂 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝑂 ≠ 𝑇    ⇒   ⊢ ({{𝐴, 𝑂}, {𝐵, 𝑇}} = {{𝐶, 𝑂}, {𝐷, 𝑇}} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))
Theorem	opthhausdorff0 5426	Justification theorem for the ordered pair definition of Felix Hausdorff in "Grundzüge der Mengenlehre" ("Basics of Set Theory"), 1914, p. 32: ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩H = {{𝐴, 𝑂}, {𝐵, 𝑇}}. Hausdorff used 1 and 2 instead of 𝑂 and 𝑇, but actually, any two different fixed sets will do (e.g., 𝑂 = ∅ and 𝑇 = {∅}, see 0nep0 5275). Furthermore, Hausdorff demanded that 𝑂 and 𝑇 are both different from 𝐴 as well as 𝐵, which is actually not necessary if all involved classes exist as sets (i.e. are not proper classes), in contrast to opthhausdorff 5425. See df-op 4565 for other ordered pair definitions. (Contributed by AV, 12-Jun-2022.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝑂 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝑇 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝑂 ≠ 𝑇    ⇒   ⊢ ({{𝐴, 𝑂}, {𝐵, 𝑇}} = {{𝐶, 𝑂}, {𝐷, 𝑇}} ↔ (𝐴 = 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 = 𝐷))
Theorem	otsndisj 5427*	The singletons consisting of ordered triples which have distinct third components are disjoint. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Mar-2018.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑌) → Disj 𝑐 ∈ 𝑉 {⟨𝐴, 𝐵, 𝑐⟩})
Theorem	otiunsndisj 5428*	The union of singletons consisting of ordered triples which have distinct first and third components are disjoint. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 10-Mar-2018.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑋 → Disj 𝑎 ∈ 𝑉 ∪ 𝑐 ∈ (𝑊 ∖ {𝑎}){⟨𝑎, 𝐵, 𝑐⟩})
Theorem	iunopeqop 5429*	Implication of an ordered pair being equal to an indexed union of singletons of ordered pairs. (Contributed by AV, 20-Sep-2020.) (Avoid depending on this detail.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ≠ ∅ → (∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {⟨𝑥, 𝐵⟩} = ⟨𝐶, 𝐷⟩ → ∃𝑧 𝐴 = {𝑧}))
Theorem	brsnop 5430	Binary relation for an ordered pair singleton. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Sep-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑋{⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}𝑌 ↔ (𝑋 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 = 𝐵)))
2.3.4  Ordered-pair class abstractions (cont.)
Theorem	opabidw 5431*	The law of concretion. Special case of Theorem 9.5 of [Quine] p. 61. Version of opabid 5432 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2372. (Contributed by NM, 14-Apr-1995.) (Revised by Gino Giotto, 26-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑)
Theorem	opabid 5432	The law of concretion. Special case of Theorem 9.5 of [Quine] p. 61. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2372. Use the weaker opabidw 5431 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 14-Apr-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑)
Theorem	elopab 5433*	Membership in a class abstraction of ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 24-Mar-1998.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐴 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	rexopabb 5434*	Restricted existential quantification over an ordered-pair class abstraction. (Contributed by AV, 8-Nov-2023.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}    &   ⊢ (𝑜 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑜 ∈ 𝑂 𝜓 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝜑 ∧ 𝜒))
Theorem	vopelopabsb 5435*	The law of concretion in terms of substitutions. Version of opelopabsb 5436 with set variables. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2002.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-Jul-2011.) Remove unnecessary commutation. (Revised by SN, 1-Sep-2024.)
⊢ (⟨𝑧, 𝑤⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥][𝑤 / 𝑦]𝜑)
Theorem	opelopabsb 5436*	The law of concretion in terms of substitutions. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2002.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2016.)
⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜑)
Theorem	brabsb 5437*	The law of concretion in terms of substitutions. (Contributed by NM, 17-Mar-2008.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ [𝐴 / 𝑥][𝐵 / 𝑦]𝜑)
Theorem	opelopabt 5438*	Closed theorem form of opelopab 5448. (Contributed by NM, 19-Feb-2013.)
⊢ ((∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ∧ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	opelopabga 5439*	The law of concretion. Theorem 9.5 of [Quine] p. 61. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	brabga 5440*	The law of concretion for a binary relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	opelopab2a 5441*	Ordered pair membership in an ordered pair class abstraction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.)
⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	opelopaba 5442*	The law of concretion. Theorem 9.5 of [Quine] p. 61. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	braba 5443*	The law of concretion for a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2013.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	opelopabg 5444*	The law of concretion. Theorem 9.5 of [Quine] p. 61. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	brabg 5445*	The law of concretion for a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	opelopabgf 5446*	The law of concretion. Theorem 9.5 of [Quine] p. 61. This version of opelopabg 5444 uses bound-variable hypotheses in place of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 8-Jul-2018.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜒    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	opelopab2 5447*	Ordered pair membership in an ordered pair class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 14-Oct-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐷) ∧ 𝜑)} ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	opelopab 5448*	The law of concretion. Theorem 9.5 of [Quine] p. 61. (Contributed by NM, 16-May-1995.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜒)
Theorem	brab 5449*	The law of concretion for a binary relation. (Contributed by NM, 16-Aug-1999.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ↔ 𝜒)
Theorem	opelopabaf 5450*	The law of concretion. Theorem 9.5 of [Quine] p. 61. This version of opelopab 5448 uses bound-variable hypotheses in place of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Dec-2013.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2016.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜓    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜓)
Theorem	opelopabf 5451*	The law of concretion. Theorem 9.5 of [Quine] p. 61. This version of opelopab 5448 uses bound-variable hypotheses in place of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 19-Dec-2008.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜒    &   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝐵 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜒)
Theorem	ssopab2 5452	Equivalence of ordered pair abstraction subclass and implication. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-May-2013.)
⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓) → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓})
Theorem	ssopab2bw 5453*	Equivalence of ordered pair abstraction subclass and implication. Version of ssopab2b 5455 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2372. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.) (Revised by Gino Giotto, 26-Jan-2024.)
⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	eqopab2bw 5454*	Equivalence of ordered pair abstraction equality and biconditional. Version of eqopab2b 5458 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2372. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (Revised by Gino Giotto, 26-Jan-2024.)
⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	ssopab2b 5455	Equivalence of ordered pair abstraction subclass and implication. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2372. Use the weaker ssopab2bw 5453 when possible. (Contributed by NM, 27-Dec-1996.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 → 𝜓))
Theorem	ssopab2i 5456	Inference of ordered pair abstraction subclass from implication. (Contributed by NM, 5-Apr-1995.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓}
Theorem	ssopab2dv 5457*	Inference of ordered pair abstraction subclass from implication. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ⊆ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜒})
Theorem	eqopab2b 5458	Equivalence of ordered pair abstraction equality and biconditional. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2372. Use the weaker eqopab2bw 5454 when possible. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜓} ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦(𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
Theorem	opabn0 5459	Nonempty ordered pair class abstraction. (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-2007.)
⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦𝜑)
Theorem	opab0 5460	Empty ordered pair class abstraction. (Contributed by AV, 29-Oct-2021.)
⊢ ({⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦 ¬ 𝜑)
Theorem	csbopab 5461*	Move substitution into a class abstraction. Version of csbopabgALT 5462 without a sethood antecedent but depending on more axioms. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-2007.) (Revised by NM, 23-Aug-2018.)
⊢ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑}
Theorem	csbopabgALT 5462*	Move substitution into a class abstraction. Version of csbopab 5461 with a sethood antecedent but depending on fewer axioms. (Contributed by NM, 6-Aug-2007.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 17-Nov-2016.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑})
Theorem	csbmpt12 5463*	Move substitution into a maps-to notation. (Contributed by AV, 26-Sep-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ 𝑍) = (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑌 ↦ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑍))
Theorem	csbmpt2 5464*	Move substitution into the second part of a maps-to notation. (Contributed by AV, 26-Sep-2019.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ 𝑍) = (𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ↦ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑍))
Theorem	iunopab 5465*	Move indexed union inside an ordered-pair class abstraction. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ∪ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑}
Theorem	elopabr 5466*	Membership in an ordered-pair class abstraction defined by a binary relation. (Contributed by AV, 16-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥𝑅𝑦} → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅)
Theorem	elopabran 5467*	Membership in an ordered-pair class abstraction defined by a restricted binary relation. (Contributed by AV, 16-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝜓)} → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑅)
Theorem	rbropapd 5468*	Properties of a pair in an extended binary relation. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 30-Oct-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓𝑊𝑝 ∧ 𝜓)})    &   ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑝 = 𝑃) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐹𝑀𝑃 ↔ (𝐹𝑊𝑃 ∧ 𝜒))))
Theorem	rbropap 5469*	Properties of a pair in a restricted binary relation 𝑀 expressed as an ordered-pair class abstraction: 𝑀 is the binary relation 𝑊 restricted by the condition 𝜓. (Contributed by AV, 31-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓𝑊𝑝 ∧ 𝜓)})    &   ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑝 = 𝑃) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐹𝑀𝑃 ↔ (𝐹𝑊𝑃 ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	2rbropap 5470*	Properties of a pair in a restricted binary relation 𝑀 expressed as an ordered-pair class abstraction: 𝑀 is the binary relation 𝑊 restricted by the conditions 𝜓 and 𝜏. (Contributed by AV, 31-Jan-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓𝑊𝑝 ∧ 𝜓 ∧ 𝜏)})    &   ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑝 = 𝑃) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ ((𝑓 = 𝐹 ∧ 𝑝 = 𝑃) → (𝜏 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑌) → (𝐹𝑀𝑃 ↔ (𝐹𝑊𝑃 ∧ 𝜒 ∧ 𝜃)))
Theorem	0nelopab 5471	The empty set is never an element in an ordered-pair class abstraction. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 5-Nov-2017.) Reduce axiom usage and shorten proof. (Revised by Gino Giotto, 3-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	0nelopabOLD 5472	Obsolete version of 0nelopab 5471 as of 3-Oct-2024. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 5-Nov-2017.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	brabv 5473	If two classes are in a relationship given by an ordered-pair class abstraction, the classes are sets. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 5-Nov-2017.)
⊢ (𝑋{⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}𝑌 → (𝑋 ∈ V ∧ 𝑌 ∈ V))
2.3.5  Power class of union and intersection
Theorem	pwin 5474	The power class of the intersection of two classes is the intersection of their power classes. Exercise 4.12(j) of [Mendelson] p. 235. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-2003.)
⊢ 𝒫 (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = (𝒫 𝐴 ∩ 𝒫 𝐵)
Theorem	pwunssOLD 5475	Obsolete version of pwunss 4550 as of 30-Dec-2023. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-2003.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝒫 𝐴 ∪ 𝒫 𝐵) ⊆ 𝒫 (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)
Theorem	pwssun 5476	The power class of the union of two classes is a subset of the union of their power classes, iff one class is a subclass of the other. Exercise 4.12(l) of [Mendelson] p. 235. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-2003.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) ↔ 𝒫 (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ⊆ (𝒫 𝐴 ∪ 𝒫 𝐵))
Theorem	pwundifOLD 5477	Obsolete proof of pwundif 4556 as of 26-Dec-2023. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2007.) (Proof shortened by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Dec-2016.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝒫 (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = ((𝒫 (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∖ 𝒫 𝐴) ∪ 𝒫 𝐴)
Theorem	pwun 5478	The power class of the union of two classes equals the union of their power classes, iff one class is a subclass of the other. Part of Exercise 7(b) of [Enderton] p. 28. (Contributed by NM, 23-Nov-2003.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) ↔ 𝒫 (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) = (𝒫 𝐴 ∪ 𝒫 𝐵))
2.3.6  The identity relation
Syntax	cid 5479	Extend the definition of a class to include the identity relation.
class I
Definition	df-id 5480*	Define the identity relation. Definition 9.15 of [Quine] p. 64. For example, 5 I 5 and ¬ 4 I 5 (ex-id 28699). (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.)
⊢ I = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥 = 𝑦}
Theorem	dfid4 5481	The identity function expressed using maps-to notation. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Dec-2017.)
⊢ I = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ 𝑥)
Theorem	dfid2 5482	Alternate definition of the identity relation. Instance of dfid3 5483 not requiring auxiliary axioms. (Contributed by NM, 15-Mar-2007.) Reduce axiom usage. (Revised by Gino Giotto, 4-Nov-2024.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 5-Nov-2024.) Use df-id 5480 instead to make the semantics of the constructor df-opab 5133 clearer. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ I = {⟨𝑥, 𝑥⟩ ∣ 𝑥 = 𝑥}
Theorem	dfid3 5483	A stronger version of df-id 5480 that does not require 𝑥 and 𝑦 to be disjoint. This is not the definition since, in order to pass our definition soundness test, a definition has to have disjoint dummy variables, see conventions 28665. The proof can be instructive in showing how disjoint variable conditions may be eliminated, a task that is not necessarily obvious. (Contributed by NM, 5-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2016.) Use df-id 5480 instead to make the semantics of the constructor df-opab 5133 clearer (in usages, 𝑥, 𝑦 will typically be dummy variables, so can be assumed disjoint). (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ I = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥 = 𝑦}
Theorem	dfid2OLD 5484	Obsolete version of dfid2 5482 as of 4-Nov-2024. (Contributed by NM, 15-Mar-2007.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ I = {⟨𝑥, 𝑥⟩ ∣ 𝑥 = 𝑥}
2.3.7  The membership relation (or epsilon relation)
Syntax	cep 5485	Extend class notation to include the membership relation.
class E
Definition	df-eprel 5486*	Define the membership relation (also called "epsilon relation" since it is sometimes denoted by the lowercase Greek letter "epsilon"). Similar to Definition 6.22 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 30. The membership relation and the membership predicate agree, that is, (𝐴 E 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵), when 𝐵 is a set (see epelg 5487). Thus, ⊢ 5 E {1, 5} (ex-eprel 28698). (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.)
⊢ E = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦}
Theorem	epelg 5487	The membership relation and the membership predicate agree when the "containing" class is a set. General version of epel 5489 and closed form of epeli 5488. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 14-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 E 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	epeli 5488	The membership relation and the membership predicate agree when the "containing" class is a set. Inference associated with epelg 5487. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Apr-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 E 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	epel 5489	The membership relation and the membership predicate agree when the "containing" class is a setvar. (Contributed by NM, 13-Aug-1995.) Replace the first setvar variable with a class variable. (Revised by BJ, 13-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝐴 E 𝑥 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥)
Theorem	0sn0ep 5490	An example for the membership relation. (Contributed by AV, 19-Jun-2022.)
⊢ ∅ E {∅}
Theorem	epn0 5491	The membership relation is nonempty. (Contributed by AV, 19-Jun-2022.)
⊢ E ≠ ∅
2.3.8  Partial and total orderings We have not yet defined relations (df-rel 5587), but here we introduce a few related notions we will use to develop ordinals. The class variable 𝑅 is no different from other class variables, but it reminds us that typically it represents what we will later call a "relation".
Syntax	wpo 5492	Extend wff notation to include the strict partial ordering predicate. Read: "𝑅 is a partial order on 𝐴".
wff 𝑅 Po 𝐴
Syntax	wor 5493	Extend wff notation to include the strict total ordering predicate. Read: "𝑅 orders 𝐴".
wff 𝑅 Or 𝐴
Definition	df-po 5494*	Define the strict partial order predicate. Definition of [Enderton] p. 168. The expression 𝑅 Po 𝐴 means 𝑅 is a partial order on 𝐴. For example, < Po ℝ is true, while ≤ Po ℝ is false (ex-po 28700). (Contributed by NM, 16-Mar-1997.)
⊢ (𝑅 Po 𝐴 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑥 ∧ ((𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑅𝑧) → 𝑥𝑅𝑧)))
Definition	df-so 5495*	Define the strict complete (linear) order predicate. The expression 𝑅 Or 𝐴 is true if relationship 𝑅 orders 𝐴. For example, < Or ℝ is true (ltso 10986). Equivalent to Definition 6.19(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 29. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-1996.)
⊢ (𝑅 Or 𝐴 ↔ (𝑅 Po 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)))
Theorem	poss 5496	Subset theorem for the partial ordering predicate. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1997.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2016.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (𝑅 Po 𝐵 → 𝑅 Po 𝐴))
Theorem	poeq1 5497	Equality theorem for partial ordering predicate. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1997.)
⊢ (𝑅 = 𝑆 → (𝑅 Po 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Po 𝐴))
Theorem	poeq2 5498	Equality theorem for partial ordering predicate. (Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-1997.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝑅 Po 𝐴 ↔ 𝑅 Po 𝐵))
Theorem	nfpo 5499	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for partial orders. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑅 Po 𝐴
Theorem	nfso 5500	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for total orders. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝑅    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝑅 Or 𝐴