Theorem wl-dfclel.basic 37875

Description: This theorem gives a conservative extension of membership of classes, without hypotheses. Conservativity alone, however, is insufficient, since issues involving alpha-renaming can still arise, see in-ax8 36453.

Although unsuitable for general use, it is adequate for the development of theorems unaffected by alpha-renaming, including:

1. Theorems whose hypotheses and conclusion contain no bound variables (see eleq1w 2823).

2. Theorems using the same bound variable throughout (see elex2 2817).

3. Theorems in which distinct bound variables arise only through implicit substitution (see eqabbw 2813).

(Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
wl-dfclel.basic	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Proof of Theorem wl-dfclel.basic

Dummy variables 𝑦 𝑧 𝑡 𝑢 𝑣 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		cleljust 2128	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ ∃𝑢(𝑢 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑧))
2		cleljust 2128	. 2 ⊢ (𝑡 ∈ 𝑡 ↔ ∃𝑣(𝑣 = 𝑡 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑡))
3	1, 2	wl-df.clel 37874	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 207   ∧ wa 396   = wceq 1547  ∃wex 1786   ∈ wcel 2119

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1802  ax-4 1816  ax-5 1917  ax-6 1974  ax-7 2015  ax-8 2121

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 208  df-an 397  df-ex 1787  df-clel 2815

This theorem is referenced by:  wl-dfclel.just  37876