Theorem wl-dfclel.basic 38640

Description: This theorem gives a conservative extension of membership of classes, without hypotheses. Conservativity alone, however, is insufficient, since issues involving alpha-renaming can still arise, see in-ax8 37204.

Although unsuitable for general use, it is adequate for the development of theorems unaffected by alpha-renaming, including:

1. Theorems whose hypotheses and conclusion contain no bound variables (see eleq1w 2847).

2. Theorems using the same bound variable throughout (see elex2 2841).

3. Theorems in which distinct bound variables arise only through implicit substitution (see eqabbw 2837).

(Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
wl-dfclel.basic	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Proof of Theorem wl-dfclel.basic

Dummy variables 𝑦 𝑧 𝑡 𝑢 𝑣 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		cleljust 2156	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ ∃𝑢(𝑢 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑧))
2		cleljust 2156	. 2 ⊢ (𝑡 ∈ 𝑡 ↔ ∃𝑣(𝑣 = 𝑡 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑡))
3	1, 2	wl-df.clel 38639	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2147

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-ex 1813  df-clel 2839

This theorem is used by:  wl-dfclel.just  38641