Theorem wl-dfclel.basic 38139

Description: This theorem gives a conservative extension of membership of classes, without hypotheses. Conservativity alone, however, is insufficient, since issues involving alpha-renaming can still arise, see in-ax8 36717.

Although unsuitable for general use, it is adequate for the development of theorems unaffected by alpha-renaming, including:

1. Theorems whose hypotheses and conclusion contain no bound variables (see eleq1w 2846).

2. Theorems using the same bound variable throughout (see elex2 2840).

3. Theorems in which distinct bound variables arise only through implicit substitution (see eqabbw 2836).

(Contributed by BJ, 27-Jun-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
wl-dfclel.basic	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Proof of Theorem wl-dfclel.basic

Dummy variables 𝑦 𝑧 𝑡 𝑢 𝑣 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		cleljust 2152	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ↔ ∃𝑢(𝑢 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑢 ∈ 𝑧))
2		cleljust 2152	. 2 ⊢ (𝑡 ∈ 𝑡 ↔ ∃𝑣(𝑣 = 𝑡 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝑡))
3	1, 2	wl-df.clel 38138	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1809   ∈ wcel 2143

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-ex 1810  df-clel 2838

This theorem is referenced by:  wl-dfclel.just  38140