| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 379 of 505) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31179) |
(31180-32702) |
(32703-50434) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecrr 37801 | The field of scalars of a real vector space is the field of real numbers. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec → (Scalar‘𝑉) = ℝfld) | ||
| Theorem | bj-isrvecd 37802 | The predicate "is a real vector space". (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (Scalar‘𝑉) = 𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec ↔ (𝑉 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐾 = ℝfld))) | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecvec 37803 | Real vector spaces are vector spaces (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec → 𝑉 ∈ LVec) | ||
| Theorem | bj-isrvec2 37804 | The predicate "is a real vector space". (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (Scalar‘𝑉) = 𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec ↔ (𝑉 ∈ LVec ∧ 𝐾 = ℝfld))) | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecssvec 37805 | Real vector spaces are vector spaces. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ ℝ-Vec ⊆ LVec | ||
| Theorem | bj-rveccmod 37806 | Real vector spaces are subcomplex modules (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec → 𝑉 ∈ ℂMod) | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecsscmod 37807 | Real vector spaces are subcomplex modules. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ ℝ-Vec ⊆ ℂMod | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecsscvec 37808 | Real vector spaces are subcomplex vector spaces. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ ℝ-Vec ⊆ ℂVec | ||
| Theorem | bj-rveccvec 37809 | Real vector spaces are subcomplex vector spaces (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jan-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ ℝ-Vec → 𝑉 ∈ ℂVec) | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecssabl 37810 | (The additive groups of) real vector spaces are commutative groups. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ℝ-Vec ⊆ Abel | ||
| Theorem | bj-rvecabl 37811 | (The additive groups of) real vector spaces are commutative groups (elemental version). (Contributed by BJ, 9-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ-Vec → 𝐴 ∈ Abel) | ||
Some lemmas to ease algebraic manipulations. | ||
| Theorem | bj-subcom 37812 | A consequence of commutativity of multiplication. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝐵) − (𝐵 · 𝐴)) = 0) | ||
| Theorem | bj-lineqi 37813 | Solution of a (scalar) linear equation. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 0) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 · 𝑋) + 𝐵) = 𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = ((𝑌 − 𝐵) / 𝐴)) | ||
Lemmas about barycentric coordinates. For the moment, this is limited to the one-dimensional case (complex line), where existence and uniqueness of barycentric coordinates are proved by bj-bary1 37816 (which computes them). It would be nice to prove the two-dimensional case (is it easier to use ad hoc computations, or Cramer formulas?), in order to do some planar geometry. | ||
| Theorem | bj-bary1lem 37814 | Lemma for bj-bary1 37816: expression for a barycenter of two points in one dimension (complex line). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = ((((𝐵 − 𝑋) / (𝐵 − 𝐴)) · 𝐴) + (((𝑋 − 𝐴) / (𝐵 − 𝐴)) · 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | bj-bary1lem1 37815 | Lemma for bj-bary1 37816: computation of one of the two barycentric coordinates of a barycenter of two points in one dimension (complex line). (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋 = ((𝑆 · 𝐴) + (𝑇 · 𝐵)) ∧ (𝑆 + 𝑇) = 1) → 𝑇 = ((𝑋 − 𝐴) / (𝐵 − 𝐴)))) | ||
| Theorem | bj-bary1 37816 | Barycentric coordinates in one dimension (complex line). In the statement, 𝑋 is the barycenter of the two points 𝐴, 𝐵 with respective normalized coefficients 𝑆, 𝑇. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℂ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ ℂ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑋 = ((𝑆 · 𝐴) + (𝑇 · 𝐵)) ∧ (𝑆 + 𝑇) = 1) ↔ (𝑆 = ((𝐵 − 𝑋) / (𝐵 − 𝐴)) ∧ 𝑇 = ((𝑋 − 𝐴) / (𝐵 − 𝐴))))) | ||
| Syntax | cend 37817 | Token for the monoid of endomorphisms. |
| class End | ||
| Definition | df-bj-end 37818* | The monoid of endomorphisms on an object of a category. (Contributed by BJ, 4-Apr-2024.) |
| ⊢ End = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑐) ↦ {〈(Base‘ndx), (𝑥(Hom ‘𝑐)𝑥)〉, 〈(+g‘ndx), (〈𝑥, 𝑥〉(comp‘𝑐)𝑥)〉})) | ||
| Theorem | bj-endval 37819 | Value of the monoid of endomorphisms on an object of a category. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Apr-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((End ‘𝐶)‘𝑋) = {〈(Base‘ndx), (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋)〉, 〈(+g‘ndx), (〈𝑋, 𝑋〉(comp‘𝐶)𝑋)〉}) | ||
| Theorem | bj-endbase 37820 | Base set of the monoid of endomorphisms on an object of a category. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Apr-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘((End ‘𝐶)‘𝑋)) = (𝑋(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | bj-endcomp 37821 | Composition law of the monoid of endomorphisms on an object of a category. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Apr-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (+g‘((End ‘𝐶)‘𝑋)) = (〈𝑋, 𝑋〉(comp‘𝐶)𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | bj-endmnd 37822 | The monoid of endomorphisms on an object of a category is a monoid. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Apr-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ (Base‘𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((End ‘𝐶)‘𝑋) ∈ Mnd) | ||
| Theorem | taupilem3 37823 | Lemma for tau-related theorems. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Feb-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (ℝ+ ∩ (◡cos “ {1})) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ (cos‘𝐴) = 1)) | ||
| Theorem | taupilemrplb 37824* | A set of positive reals has (in the reals) a lower bound. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2019.) |
| ⊢ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ (ℝ+ ∩ 𝐴)𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 | ||
| Theorem | taupilem1 37825 | Lemma for taupi 37827. A positive real whose cosine is one is at least 2 · π. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ+ ∧ (cos‘𝐴) = 1) → (2 · π) ≤ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | taupilem2 37826 | Lemma for taupi 37827. The smallest positive real whose cosine is one is at most 2 · π. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2019.) (Revised by AV, 1-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ τ ≤ (2 · π) | ||
| Theorem | taupi 37827 | Relationship between τ and π. This can be seen as connecting the ratio of a circle's circumference to its radius and the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-Feb-2019.) (Revised by AV, 1-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ τ = (2 · π) | ||
| Theorem | dfgcd3 37828* | Alternate definition of the gcd operator. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-Dec-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 gcd 𝑁) = (℩𝑑 ∈ ℕ0 ∀𝑧 ∈ ℤ (𝑧 ∥ 𝑑 ↔ (𝑧 ∥ 𝑀 ∧ 𝑧 ∥ 𝑁)))) | ||
| Theorem | irrdifflemf 37829 | Lemma for irrdiff 37830. The forward direction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ ℚ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ ℚ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℚ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ≠ 𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑄)) ≠ (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑅))) | ||
| Theorem | irrdiff 37830* | The irrationals are exactly those reals that are a different distance from every rational. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (¬ 𝐴 ∈ ℚ ↔ ∀𝑞 ∈ ℚ ∀𝑟 ∈ ℚ (𝑞 ≠ 𝑟 → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑞)) ≠ (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑟))))) | ||
| Theorem | qdiff 37831* | The rationals are exactly those reals for which there exist two distinct rationals that are the same distance from the original number. Similar to irrdiff 37830 but here proved with a proof which would also work in constructive mathematics. From an online post by Ingo Blechschmidt. For a proof using irrdiff 37830, see qdiffALT 37832. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Apr-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 ∈ ℚ ↔ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℚ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℚ (𝑞 ≠ 𝑟 ∧ (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑞)) = (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑟))))) | ||
| Theorem | qdiffALT 37832* | Alternate proof of qdiff 37831. This is a proof from irrdiff 37830 using excluded middle in a variety of places. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-Apr-2026.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 ∈ ℚ ↔ ∃𝑞 ∈ ℚ ∃𝑟 ∈ ℚ (𝑞 ≠ 𝑟 ∧ (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑞)) = (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝑟))))) | ||
| Theorem | iccioo01 37833 | The closed unit interval is equinumerous to the open unit interval. Based on a Mastodon post by Michael Kinyon. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 4-Jun-2024.) |
| ⊢ (0[,]1) ≈ (0(,)1) | ||
| Theorem | csbrecsg 37834 | Move class substitution in and out of recs. (Contributed by ML, 25-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌recs(𝐹) = recs(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹)) | ||
| Theorem | csbrdgg 37835 | Move class substitution in and out of the recursive function generator. (Contributed by ML, 25-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌rec(𝐹, 𝐼) = rec(⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹, ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐼)) | ||
| Theorem | csboprabg 37836* | Move class substitution in and out of class abstractions of nested ordered pairs. (Contributed by ML, 25-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌{〈〈𝑦, 𝑧〉, 𝑑〉 ∣ 𝜑} = {〈〈𝑦, 𝑧〉, 𝑑〉 ∣ [𝐴 / 𝑥]𝜑}) | ||
| Theorem | csbmpo123 37837* | Move class substitution in and out of maps-to notation for operations. (Contributed by ML, 25-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝑦 ∈ 𝑌, 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍 ↦ 𝐷) = (𝑦 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑌, 𝑧 ∈ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑍 ↦ ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐷)) | ||
| Theorem | con1bii2 37838 | A contraposition inference. (Contributed by ML, 18-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | con2bii2 37839 | A contraposition inference. (Contributed by ML, 18-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 ↔ ¬ 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 ↔ 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | vtoclefex 37840* | Implicit substitution of a class for a setvar variable. (Contributed by ML, 17-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → 𝜑) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | rnmptsn 37841* | The range of a function mapping to singletons. (Contributed by ML, 15-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ ran (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {𝑥}) = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢 = {𝑥}} | ||
| Theorem | f1omptsnlem 37842* | This is the core of the proof of f1omptsn 37843, but to avoid the distinct variables on the definitions, we split this proof into two. (Contributed by ML, 15-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {𝑥}) & ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢 = {𝑥}} ⇒ ⊢ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝑅 | ||
| Theorem | f1omptsn 37843* | A function mapping to singletons is bijective onto a set of singletons. (Contributed by ML, 16-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {𝑥}) & ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢 = {𝑥}} ⇒ ⊢ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝑅 | ||
| Theorem | mptsnunlem 37844* | This is the core of the proof of mptsnun 37845, but to avoid the distinct variables on the definitions, we split this proof into two. (Contributed by ML, 16-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {𝑥}) & ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢 = {𝑥}} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝐵 = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | mptsnun 37845* | A class 𝐵 is equal to the union of the class of all singletons of elements of 𝐵. (Contributed by ML, 16-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ {𝑥}) & ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢 = {𝑥}} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝐵 = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | dissneqlem 37846* | This is the core of the proof of dissneq 37847, but to avoid the distinct variables on the definitions, we split this proof into two. (Contributed by ML, 16-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢 = {𝑥}} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (TopOn‘𝐴)) → 𝐵 = 𝒫 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | dissneq 37847* | Any topology that contains every single-point set is the discrete topology. (Contributed by ML, 16-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐶 = {𝑢 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑢 = {𝑥}} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (TopOn‘𝐴)) → 𝐵 = 𝒫 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | exlimim 37848* | Closed form of exlimimd 37849. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((∃𝑥𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝜑 → 𝜓)) → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | exlimimd 37849* | Existential elimination rule of natural deduction. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 → 𝜒)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) | ||
| Theorem | exellim 37850* | Closed form of exellimddv 37851. See also exlimim 37848 for a more general theorem. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜑)) → 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | exellimddv 37851* | Eliminate an antecedent when the antecedent is elementhood, deduction version. See exellim 37850 for the closed form, which requires the use of a universal quantifier. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜓) | ||
| Theorem | topdifinfindis 37852* | Part of Exercise 3 of [Munkres] p. 83. The topology of all subsets 𝑥 of 𝐴 such that the complement of 𝑥 in 𝐴 is infinite, or 𝑥 is the empty set, or 𝑥 is all of 𝐴, is the trivial topology when 𝐴 is finite. (Contributed by ML, 14-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (¬ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) ∈ Fin ∨ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴))} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝑇 = {∅, 𝐴}) | ||
| Theorem | topdifinffinlem 37853* | This is the core of the proof of topdifinffin 37854, but to avoid the distinct variables on the definition, we need to split this proof into two. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (¬ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) ∈ Fin ∨ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴))} ⇒ ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (TopOn‘𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | topdifinffin 37854* | Part of Exercise 3 of [Munkres] p. 83. The topology of all subsets 𝑥 of 𝐴 such that the complement of 𝑥 in 𝐴 is infinite, or 𝑥 is the empty set, or 𝑥 is all of 𝐴, is a topology only if 𝐴 is finite. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (¬ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) ∈ Fin ∨ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴))} ⇒ ⊢ (𝑇 ∈ (TopOn‘𝐴) → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | topdifinf 37855* | Part of Exercise 3 of [Munkres] p. 83. The topology of all subsets 𝑥 of 𝐴 such that the complement of 𝑥 in 𝐴 is infinite, or 𝑥 is the empty set, or 𝑥 is all of 𝐴, is a topology if and only if 𝐴 is finite, in which case it is the trivial topology. (Contributed by ML, 17-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑇 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (¬ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) ∈ Fin ∨ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴))} ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑇 ∈ (TopOn‘𝐴) ↔ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) ∧ (𝑇 ∈ (TopOn‘𝐴) → 𝑇 = {∅, 𝐴})) | ||
| Theorem | topdifinfeq 37856* | Two different ways of defining the collection from Exercise 3 of [Munkres] p. 83. (Contributed by ML, 18-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (¬ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) ∈ Fin ∨ ((𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) = ∅ ∨ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) = 𝐴))} = {𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∣ (¬ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑥) ∈ Fin ∨ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ 𝑥 = 𝐴))} | ||
| Theorem | icorempo 37857* | Closed-below, open-above intervals of reals. (Contributed by ML, 26-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = ([,) ↾ (ℝ × ℝ)) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ ℝ, 𝑦 ∈ ℝ ↦ {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝑥 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑦)}) | ||
| Theorem | icoreresf 37858 | Closed-below, open-above intervals of reals map to subsets of reals. (Contributed by ML, 25-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ ([,) ↾ (ℝ × ℝ)):(ℝ × ℝ)⟶𝒫 ℝ | ||
| Theorem | icoreval 37859* | Value of the closed-below, open-above interval function on reals. (Contributed by ML, 26-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴[,)𝐵) = {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝐴 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝐵)}) | ||
| Theorem | icoreelrnab 37860* | Elementhood in the set of closed-below, open-above intervals of reals. (Contributed by ML, 27-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐼 ↔ ∃𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∃𝑏 ∈ ℝ 𝑋 = {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝑎 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑏)}) | ||
| Theorem | isbasisrelowllem1 37861* | Lemma for isbasisrelowl 37864. (Contributed by ML, 27-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝑎 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑏)}) ∧ (𝑐 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑑 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝑐 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑑)})) ∧ (𝑎 ≤ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑏 ≤ 𝑑)) → (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∈ 𝐼) | ||
| Theorem | isbasisrelowllem2 37862* | Lemma for isbasisrelowl 37864. (Contributed by ML, 27-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ)) ⇒ ⊢ ((((𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑥 = {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝑎 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑏)}) ∧ (𝑐 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑑 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑦 = {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝑐 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑑)})) ∧ (𝑎 ≤ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑑 ≤ 𝑏)) → (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∈ 𝐼) | ||
| Theorem | icoreclin 37863* | The set of closed-below, open-above intervals of reals is closed under finite intersection. (Contributed by ML, 27-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐼) → (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∈ 𝐼) | ||
| Theorem | isbasisrelowl 37864 | The set of all closed-below, open-above intervals of reals form a basis. (Contributed by ML, 27-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ)) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐼 ∈ TopBases | ||
| Theorem | icoreunrn 37865 | The union of all closed-below, open-above intervals of reals is the set of reals. (Contributed by ML, 27-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ)) ⇒ ⊢ ℝ = ∪ 𝐼 | ||
| Theorem | istoprelowl 37866 | The set of all closed-below, open-above intervals of reals generate a topology on the reals. (Contributed by ML, 27-Jul-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ)) ⇒ ⊢ (topGen‘𝐼) ∈ (TopOn‘ℝ) | ||
| Theorem | icoreelrn 37867* | A class abstraction which is an element of the set of closed-below, open-above intervals of reals. (Contributed by ML, 1-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → {𝑧 ∈ ℝ ∣ (𝐴 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝐵)} ∈ 𝐼) | ||
| Theorem | iooelexlt 37868* | An element of an open interval is not its smallest element. (Contributed by ML, 2-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (𝐴(,)𝐵) → ∃𝑦 ∈ (𝐴(,)𝐵)𝑦 < 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | relowlssretop 37869 | The lower limit topology on the reals is finer than the standard topology. (Contributed by ML, 1-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ)) ⇒ ⊢ (topGen‘ran (,)) ⊆ (topGen‘𝐼) | ||
| Theorem | relowlpssretop 37870 | The lower limit topology on the reals is strictly finer than the standard topology. (Contributed by ML, 2-Aug-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐼 = ([,) “ (ℝ × ℝ)) ⇒ ⊢ (topGen‘ran (,)) ⊊ (topGen‘𝐼) | ||
| Theorem | sucneqond 37871 | Inequality of an ordinal set with its successor. Does not use the axiom of regularity. (Contributed by ML, 18-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 = suc 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ On) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌) | ||
| Theorem | sucneqoni 37872 | Inequality of an ordinal set with its successor. Does not use the axiom of regularity. (Contributed by ML, 18-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝑋 = suc 𝑌 & ⊢ 𝑌 ∈ On ⇒ ⊢ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌 | ||
| Theorem | onsucuni3 37873 | If an ordinal number has a predecessor, then it is successor of that predecessor. (Contributed by ML, 17-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐵) → 𝐵 = suc ∪ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | 1oequni2o 37874 | The ordinal number 1o is the predecessor of the ordinal number 2o. (Contributed by ML, 19-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ 1o = ∪ 2o | ||
| Theorem | rdgsucuni 37875 | If an ordinal number has a predecessor, the value of the recursive definition generator at that number in terms of its predecessor. (Contributed by ML, 17-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐵) → (rec(𝐹, 𝐼)‘𝐵) = (𝐹‘(rec(𝐹, 𝐼)‘∪ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | rdgeqoa 37876 | If a recursive function with an initial value 𝐴 at step 𝑁 is equal to itself with an initial value 𝐵 at step 𝑀, then every finite number of successor steps will also be equal. (Contributed by ML, 21-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ On ∧ 𝑀 ∈ On ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ω) → ((rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝑁) = (rec(𝐹, 𝐵)‘𝑀) → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘(𝑁 +o 𝑋)) = (rec(𝐹, 𝐵)‘(𝑀 +o 𝑋)))) | ||
| Theorem | elxp8 37877 | Membership in a Cartesian product. This version requires no quantifiers or dummy variables. See also elxp7 8009. (Contributed by ML, 19-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) ↔ ((1st ‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (V × 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | cbveud 37878* | Deduction used to change bound variables in an existential uniqueness quantifier, using implicit substitution. (Contributed by ML, 27-Mar-2021.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑦𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | cbvreud 37879* | Deduction used to change bound variables in a restricted existential uniqueness quantifier. (Contributed by ML, 27-Mar-2021.) |
| ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜑 & ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑 & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜓) & ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ ∃!𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝜒)) | ||
| Theorem | difunieq 37880 | The difference of unions is a subset of the union of the difference. (Contributed by ML, 29-Mar-2021.) |
| ⊢ (∪ 𝐴 ∖ ∪ 𝐵) ⊆ ∪ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | inunissunidif 37881 | Theorem about subsets of the difference of unions. (Contributed by ML, 29-Mar-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ ∪ 𝐶) = ∅ → (𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ (𝐵 ∖ 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | rdgellim 37882 | Elementhood in a recursive definition at a limit ordinal. (Contributed by ML, 30-Mar-2022.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ On ∧ Lim 𝐵) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ∈ (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐶) → 𝑋 ∈ (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | rdglimss 37883 | A recursive definition at a limit ordinal is a superset of itself at any smaller ordinal. (Contributed by ML, 30-Mar-2022.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐵 ∈ On ∧ Lim 𝐵) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵) → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐶) ⊆ (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | rdgssun 37884* | In a recursive definition where each step expands on the previous one using a union, every previous step is a subset of every later step. (Contributed by ML, 1-Apr-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 ∪ 𝐵)) & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ On ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑋) → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝑌) ⊆ (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | exrecfnlem 37885* | Lemma for exrecfn 37886. (Contributed by ML, 30-Mar-2022.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑧 ∪ ran (𝑦 ∈ 𝑧 ↦ 𝐵))) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑦 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ∃𝑥(𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | exrecfn 37886* | Theorem about the existence of infinite recursive sets. 𝑦 should usually be free in 𝐵. (Contributed by ML, 30-Mar-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑦 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ∃𝑥(𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | exrecfnpw 37887* | For any base set, a set which contains the powerset of all of its own elements exists. (Contributed by ML, 30-Mar-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∃𝑥(𝐴 ⊆ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝒫 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | finorwe 37888 | If the Axiom of Infinity is denied, every total order is a well-order. The notion of a well-order cannot be usefully expressed without the Axiom of Infinity due to the inability to quantify over proper classes. (Contributed by ML, 5-Oct-2023.) |
| ⊢ (¬ ω ∈ V → ( < Or 𝐴 → < We 𝐴)) | ||
| Syntax | cfinxp 37889 | Extend the definition of a class to include Cartesian exponentiation. |
| class (𝑈↑↑𝑁) | ||
| Definition | df-finxp 37890* |
Define Cartesian exponentiation on a class.
Note that this definition is limited to finite exponents, since it is defined using nested ordered pairs. If tuples of infinite length are needed, or if they might be needed in the future, use df-ixp 8884 or df-map 8814 instead. The main advantage of this definition is that it integrates better with functions and relations. For example if 𝑅 is a subset of (𝐴↑↑2o), then df-br 5106 can be used on it, and df-fv 6533 can also be used, and so on. It's also worth keeping in mind that ((𝑈↑↑𝑀) × (𝑈↑↑𝑁)) is generally not equal to (𝑈↑↑(𝑀 +o 𝑁)). This definition is technical. Use finxp1o 37898 and finxpsuc 37904 for a more standard recursive experience. (Contributed by ML, 16-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝑈↑↑𝑁) = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ ∅ = (rec((𝑛 ∈ ω, 𝑥 ∈ V ↦ if((𝑛 = 1o ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈), ∅, if(𝑥 ∈ (V × 𝑈), 〈∪ 𝑛, (1st ‘𝑥)〉, 〈𝑛, 𝑥〉))), 〈𝑁, 𝑦〉)‘𝑁))} | ||
| Theorem | dffinxpf 37891* | This theorem is the same as Definition df-finxp 37890, except that the large function is replaced by a class variable for brevity. (Contributed by ML, 24-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ω, 𝑥 ∈ V ↦ if((𝑛 = 1o ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈), ∅, if(𝑥 ∈ (V × 𝑈), 〈∪ 𝑛, (1st ‘𝑥)〉, 〈𝑛, 𝑥〉))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑈↑↑𝑁) = {𝑦 ∣ (𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ ∅ = (rec(𝐹, 〈𝑁, 𝑦〉)‘𝑁))} | ||
| Theorem | finxpeq1 37892 | Equality theorem for Cartesian exponentiation. (Contributed by ML, 19-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝑈 = 𝑉 → (𝑈↑↑𝑁) = (𝑉↑↑𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | finxpeq2 37893 | Equality theorem for Cartesian exponentiation. (Contributed by ML, 19-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝑀 = 𝑁 → (𝑈↑↑𝑀) = (𝑈↑↑𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | csbfinxpg 37894* | Distribute proper substitution through Cartesian exponentiation. (Contributed by ML, 25-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝑈↑↑𝑁) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑈↑↑⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝑁)) | ||
| Theorem | finxpreclem1 37895* | Lemma for ↑↑ recursion theorems. (Contributed by ML, 17-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑈 → ∅ = ((𝑛 ∈ ω, 𝑥 ∈ V ↦ if((𝑛 = 1o ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈), ∅, if(𝑥 ∈ (V × 𝑈), 〈∪ 𝑛, (1st ‘𝑥)〉, 〈𝑛, 𝑥〉)))‘〈1o, 𝑋〉)) | ||
| Theorem | finxpreclem2 37896* | Lemma for ↑↑ recursion theorems. (Contributed by ML, 17-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ V ∧ ¬ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑈) → ¬ ∅ = ((𝑛 ∈ ω, 𝑥 ∈ V ↦ if((𝑛 = 1o ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈), ∅, if(𝑥 ∈ (V × 𝑈), 〈∪ 𝑛, (1st ‘𝑥)〉, 〈𝑛, 𝑥〉)))‘〈1o, 𝑋〉)) | ||
| Theorem | finxp0 37897 | The value of Cartesian exponentiation at zero. (Contributed by ML, 24-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝑈↑↑∅) = ∅ | ||
| Theorem | finxp1o 37898 | The value of Cartesian exponentiation at one. (Contributed by ML, 17-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ (𝑈↑↑1o) = 𝑈 | ||
| Theorem | finxpreclem3 37899* | Lemma for ↑↑ recursion theorems. (Contributed by ML, 20-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ω, 𝑥 ∈ V ↦ if((𝑛 = 1o ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈), ∅, if(𝑥 ∈ (V × 𝑈), 〈∪ 𝑛, (1st ‘𝑥)〉, 〈𝑛, 𝑥〉))) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ 2o ⊆ 𝑁) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (V × 𝑈)) → 〈∪ 𝑁, (1st ‘𝑋)〉 = (𝐹‘〈𝑁, 𝑋〉)) | ||
| Theorem | finxpreclem4 37900* | Lemma for ↑↑ recursion theorems. (Contributed by ML, 23-Oct-2020.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑛 ∈ ω, 𝑥 ∈ V ↦ if((𝑛 = 1o ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑈), ∅, if(𝑥 ∈ (V × 𝑈), 〈∪ 𝑛, (1st ‘𝑥)〉, 〈𝑛, 𝑥〉))) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ 2o ⊆ 𝑁) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (V × 𝑈)) → (rec(𝐹, 〈𝑁, 𝑦〉)‘𝑁) = (rec(𝐹, 〈∪ 𝑁, (1st ‘𝑦)〉)‘∪ 𝑁)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |