P. 379 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 37801-37900   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	lnjatN 37801*	Given an atom in a line, there is another atom which when joined equals the line. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (Lines‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (pmap‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑀‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋)) → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑞 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑋 = (𝑃 ∨ 𝑞)))
Theorem	lncvrelatN 37802	A lattice element covered by a line is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (Lines‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (pmap‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ((𝑀‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑃𝐶𝑋)) → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	lncvrat 37803	A line covers the atoms it contains. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (Lines‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (pmap‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑀‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋)) → 𝑃𝐶𝑋)
Theorem	lncmp 37804	If two lines are comparable, they are equal. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (Lines‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (pmap‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ((𝑀‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑁 ∧ (𝑀‘𝑌) ∈ 𝑁)) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑌))
Theorem	2lnat 37805	Two intersecting lines intersect at an atom. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (Lines‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (pmap‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑁 ∧ (𝐹‘𝑌) ∈ 𝑁) ∧ (𝑋 ≠ 𝑌 ∧ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ≠ 0 )) → (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	2atm2atN 37806	Two joins with a common atom have a nonzero meet. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄)) ≠ 0 )
Theorem	2llnma1b 37807	Generalization of 2llnma1 37808. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑋)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) = 𝑃)
Theorem	2llnma1 37808	Two different intersecting lines (expressed in terms of atoms) meet at their common point (atom). (Contributed by NM, 11-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) = 𝑄)
Theorem	2llnma3r 37809	Two different intersecting lines (expressed in terms of atoms) meet at their common point (atom). (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ≠ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) = 𝑅)
Theorem	2llnma2 37810	Two different intersecting lines (expressed in terms of atoms) meet at their common point (atom). (Contributed by NM, 28-May-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄)) = 𝑅)
Theorem	2llnma2rN 37811	Two different intersecting lines (expressed in terms of atoms) meet at their common point (atom). (Contributed by NM, 2-May-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) = 𝑅)
20.24.13  Construction of a vector space from a Hilbert lattice
Theorem	cdlema1N 37812	A condition for required for proof of Lemma A in [Crawley] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 29-Apr-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (Lines‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (pmap‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑅 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ (𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑌) ∧ ((𝐹‘𝑌) ∈ 𝑁 ∧ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋))) → (𝑋 ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑋 ∨ 𝑌))
Theorem	cdlema2N 37813	A condition for required for proof of Lemma A in [Crawley] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 9-May-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑅 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ (𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋))) → (𝑅 ∧ 𝑋) = 0 )
Theorem	cdlemblem 37814	Lemma for cdlemb 37815. (Contributed by NM, 8-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑋𝐶 1 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋)) ∧ (𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑢 ≠ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑢 < 𝑋)) ∧ (𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑟 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑟 ≠ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑢)))) → (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))
Theorem	cdlemb 37815*	Given two atoms not less than or equal to an element covered by 1, there is a third. Lemma B in [Crawley] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 8-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑋𝐶 1 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋)) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))
Syntax	cpadd 37816	Extend class notation with projective subspace sum.
class +𝑃
Definition	df-padd 37817*	Define projective sum of two subspaces (or more generally two sets of atoms), which is the union of all lines generated by pairs of atoms from each subspace. Lemma 16.2 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 68. For convenience, our definition is generalized to apply to empty sets. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2011.)
⊢ +𝑃 = (𝑙 ∈ V ↦ (𝑚 ∈ 𝒫 (Atoms‘𝑙), 𝑛 ∈ 𝒫 (Atoms‘𝑙) ↦ ((𝑚 ∪ 𝑛) ∪ {𝑝 ∈ (Atoms‘𝑙) ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑚 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑛 𝑝(le‘𝑙)(𝑞(join‘𝑙)𝑟)})))
Theorem	paddfval 37818*	Projective subspace sum operation. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2011.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 → + = (𝑚 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴, 𝑛 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ↦ ((𝑚 ∪ 𝑛) ∪ {𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑚 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑛 𝑝 ≤ (𝑞 ∨ 𝑟)})))
Theorem	paddval 37819*	Projective subspace sum operation value. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2011.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) = ((𝑋 ∪ 𝑌) ∪ {𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑋 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑌 𝑝 ≤ (𝑞 ∨ 𝑟)}))
Theorem	elpadd 37820*	Member of a projective subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2011.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑆 ∈ (𝑋 + 𝑌) ↔ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝑋 ∨ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑌) ∨ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑋 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑌 𝑆 ≤ (𝑞 ∨ 𝑟)))))
Theorem	elpaddn0 37821*	Member of projective subspace sum of nonempty sets. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑌 ≠ ∅)) → (𝑆 ∈ (𝑋 + 𝑌) ↔ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑋 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑌 𝑆 ≤ (𝑞 ∨ 𝑟))))
Theorem	paddvaln0N 37822*	Projective subspace sum operation value for nonempty sets. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jan-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑌 ≠ ∅)) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) = {𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝑋 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝑌 𝑝 ≤ (𝑞 ∨ 𝑟)})
Theorem	elpaddri 37823	Condition implying membership in a projective subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑌) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) → 𝑆 ∈ (𝑋 + 𝑌))
Theorem	elpaddatriN 37824	Condition implying membership in a projective subspace sum with a point. (Contributed by NM, 1-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄))) → 𝑆 ∈ (𝑋 + {𝑄}))
Theorem	elpaddat 37825*	Membership in a projective subspace sum with a point. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑋 ≠ ∅) → (𝑆 ∈ (𝑋 + {𝑄}) ↔ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝑋 𝑆 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑄))))
Theorem	elpaddatiN 37826*	Consequence of membership in a projective subspace sum with a point. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑅 ∈ (𝑋 + {𝑄}))) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝑋 𝑅 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑄))
Theorem	elpadd2at 37827	Membership in a projective subspace sum of two points. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑆 ∈ ({𝑄} + {𝑅}) ↔ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))))
Theorem	elpadd2at2 37828	Membership in a projective subspace sum of two points. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑆 ∈ ({𝑄} + {𝑅}) ↔ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	paddunssN 37829	Projective subspace sum includes the set union of its arguments. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑋 ∪ 𝑌) ⊆ (𝑋 + 𝑌))
Theorem	elpadd0 37830	Member of projective subspace sum with at least one empty set. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ¬ (𝑋 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑌 ≠ ∅)) → (𝑆 ∈ (𝑋 + 𝑌) ↔ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑋 ∨ 𝑆 ∈ 𝑌)))
Theorem	paddval0 37831	Projective subspace sum with at least one empty set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ¬ (𝑋 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑌 ≠ ∅)) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) = (𝑋 ∪ 𝑌))
Theorem	padd01 37832	Projective subspace sum with an empty set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑋 + ∅) = 𝑋)
Theorem	padd02 37833	Projective subspace sum with an empty set. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴) → (∅ + 𝑋) = 𝑋)
Theorem	paddcom 37834	Projective subspace sum commutes. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) = (𝑌 + 𝑋))
Theorem	paddssat 37835	A projective subspace sum is a set of atoms. (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	sspadd1 37836	A projective subspace sum is a superset of its first summand. (ssun1 4107 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝑋 ⊆ (𝑋 + 𝑌))
Theorem	sspadd2 37837	A projective subspace sum is a superset of its second summand. (ssun2 4108 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 3-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝑋 ⊆ (𝑌 + 𝑋))
Theorem	paddss1 37838	Subset law for projective subspace sum. (unss1 4114 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑋 ⊆ 𝑌 → (𝑋 + 𝑍) ⊆ (𝑌 + 𝑍)))
Theorem	paddss2 37839	Subset law for projective subspace sum. (unss2 4116 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝑋 ⊆ 𝑌 → (𝑍 + 𝑋) ⊆ (𝑍 + 𝑌)))
Theorem	paddss12 37840	Subset law for projective subspace sum. (unss12 4117 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑊 ⊆ 𝐴) → ((𝑋 ⊆ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝑊) → (𝑋 + 𝑍) ⊆ (𝑌 + 𝑊)))
Theorem	paddasslem1 37841	Lemma for paddass 37859. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦) ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦)) → ¬ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑟 ∨ 𝑦))
Theorem	paddasslem2 37842	Lemma for paddass 37859. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧))) → 𝑧 ≤ (𝑟 ∨ 𝑦))
Theorem	paddasslem3 37843*	Lemma for paddass 37859. Restate projective space axiom ps-2 37499. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((¬ 𝑥 ≤ (𝑟 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑧) ∧ (𝑝 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑟) ∧ 𝑧 ≤ (𝑟 ∨ 𝑦))) → ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑠 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑧))))
Theorem	paddasslem4 37844*	Lemma for paddass 37859. Combine paddasslem1 37841, paddasslem2 37842, and paddasslem3 37843. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑝 ≠ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦))) ∧ (𝑝 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑟) ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧))) → ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑠 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑧)))
Theorem	paddasslem5 37845	Lemma for paddass 37859. Show 𝑠 ≠ 𝑧 by contradiction. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧) ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦))) → 𝑠 ≠ 𝑧)
Theorem	paddasslem6 37846	Lemma for paddass 37859. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑠 ≠ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑧))) → 𝑝 ≤ (𝑠 ∨ 𝑧))
Theorem	paddasslem7 37847	Lemma for paddass 37859. Combine paddasslem5 37845 and paddasslem6 37846. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ ((¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧) ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦)) ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑧))) → 𝑝 ≤ (𝑠 ∨ 𝑧))
Theorem	paddasslem8 37848	Lemma for paddass 37859. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍) ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑝 ≤ (𝑠 ∨ 𝑧))) → 𝑝 ∈ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem9 37849	Lemma for paddass 37859. Combine paddasslem7 37847 and paddasslem8 37848. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍) ∧ (¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧)) ∧ (𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑠 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑧)))) → 𝑝 ∈ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem10 37850	Lemma for paddass 37859. Use paddasslem4 37844 to eliminate 𝑠 from paddasslem9 37849. (Contributed by NM, 9-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦) ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍) ∧ (¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑝 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑟) ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧)))) → 𝑝 ∈ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem11 37851	Lemma for paddass 37859. The case when 𝑝 = 𝑧. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑝 = 𝑧) ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴)) ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍) → 𝑝 ∈ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem12 37852	Lemma for paddass 37859. The case when 𝑥 = 𝑦. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍) ∧ (𝑝 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑟) ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧)))) → 𝑝 ∈ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem13 37853	Lemma for paddass 37859. The case when 𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦). (Unlike the proof in Maeda and Maeda, we don't need 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦.) (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑧) ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌) ∧ (𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ 𝑝 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑟)))) → 𝑝 ∈ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem14 37854	Lemma for paddass 37859. Remove 𝑝 ≠ 𝑧, 𝑥 ≠ 𝑦, and ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) from antecedent of paddasslem10 37850, using paddasslem11 37851, paddasslem12 37852, and paddasslem13 37853. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑍) ∧ (𝑝 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑟) ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧)))) → 𝑝 ∈ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem15 37855	Lemma for paddass 37859. Use elpaddn0 37821 to eliminate 𝑦 and 𝑧 from paddasslem14 37854. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑌 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑍 ≠ ∅)) ∧ (𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ (𝑌 + 𝑍)) ∧ 𝑝 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑟))) → 𝑝 ∈ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem16 37856	Lemma for paddass 37859. Use elpaddn0 37821 to eliminate 𝑥 and 𝑟 from paddasslem15 37855. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ((𝑋 ≠ ∅ ∧ (𝑌 + 𝑍) ≠ ∅) ∧ (𝑌 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑍 ≠ ∅))) → (𝑋 + (𝑌 + 𝑍)) ⊆ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem17 37857	Lemma for paddass 37859. The case when at least one sum argument is empty. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ ¬ ((𝑋 ≠ ∅ ∧ (𝑌 + 𝑍) ≠ ∅) ∧ (𝑌 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑍 ≠ ∅))) → (𝑋 + (𝑌 + 𝑍)) ⊆ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddasslem18 37858	Lemma for paddass 37859. Combine paddasslem16 37856 and paddasslem17 37857. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴)) → (𝑋 + (𝑌 + 𝑍)) ⊆ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍))
Theorem	paddass 37859	Projective subspace sum is associative. Equation 16.2.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 68. In our version, the subspaces do not have to be nonempty. (Contributed by NM, 29-Dec-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴)) → ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍) = (𝑋 + (𝑌 + 𝑍)))
Theorem	padd12N 37860	Commutative/associative law for projective subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴)) → (𝑋 + (𝑌 + 𝑍)) = (𝑌 + (𝑋 + 𝑍)))
Theorem	padd4N 37861	Rearrangement of 4 terms in a projective subspace sum. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑊 ⊆ 𝐴)) → ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + (𝑍 + 𝑊)) = ((𝑋 + 𝑍) + (𝑌 + 𝑊)))
Theorem	paddidm 37862	Projective subspace sum is idempotent. Part of Lemma 16.2 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 68. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑋 + 𝑋) = 𝑋)
Theorem	paddclN 37863	The projective sum of two subspaces is a subspace. Part of Lemma 16.2 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 68. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) ∈ 𝑆)
Theorem	paddssw1 37864	Subset law for projective subspace sum valid for all subsets of atoms. (Contributed by NM, 14-Mar-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴)) → ((𝑋 ⊆ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝑍) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) ⊆ (𝑍 + 𝑍)))
Theorem	paddssw2 37865	Subset law for projective subspace sum valid for all subsets of atoms. (Contributed by NM, 14-Mar-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴)) → ((𝑋 + 𝑌) ⊆ 𝑍 → (𝑋 ⊆ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝑍)))
Theorem	paddss 37866	Subset law for projective subspace sum. (unss 4119 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Mar-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝑋 ⊆ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝑍) ↔ (𝑋 + 𝑌) ⊆ 𝑍))
Theorem	pmodlem1 37867*	Lemma for pmod1i 37869. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑍 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑝 ∈ 𝑍) ∧ (𝑞 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑟 ∈ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑝 ≤ (𝑞 ∨ 𝑟))) → 𝑝 ∈ (𝑋 + (𝑌 ∩ 𝑍)))
Theorem	pmodlem2 37868	Lemma for pmod1i 37869. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝑍) → ((𝑋 + 𝑌) ∩ 𝑍) ⊆ (𝑋 + (𝑌 ∩ 𝑍)))
Theorem	pmod1i 37869	The modular law holds in a projective subspace. (Contributed by NM, 10-Mar-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑆)) → (𝑋 ⊆ 𝑍 → ((𝑋 + 𝑌) ∩ 𝑍) = (𝑋 + (𝑌 ∩ 𝑍))))
Theorem	pmod2iN 37870	Dual of the modular law. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴)) → (𝑍 ⊆ 𝑋 → ((𝑋 ∩ 𝑌) + 𝑍) = (𝑋 ∩ (𝑌 + 𝑍))))
Theorem	pmodN 37871	The modular law for projective subspaces. (Contributed by NM, 26-Mar-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑍 ⊆ 𝐴)) → (𝑋 ∩ (𝑌 + (𝑋 ∩ 𝑍))) = ((𝑋 ∩ 𝑌) + (𝑋 ∩ 𝑍)))
Theorem	pmodl42N 37872	Lemma derived from modular law. (Contributed by NM, 8-Apr-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑆 = (PSubSp‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑍 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝑆)) → (((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍) ∩ ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑊)) = ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + ((𝑋 + 𝑍) ∩ (𝑌 + 𝑊))))
Theorem	pmapjoin 37873	The projective map of the join of two lattice elements. Part of Equation 15.5.3 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 63. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (pmap‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑀‘𝑋) + (𝑀‘𝑌)) ⊆ (𝑀‘(𝑋 ∨ 𝑌)))
Theorem	pmapjat1 37874	The projective map of the join of a lattice element and an atom. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (pmap‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑀‘(𝑋 ∨ 𝑄)) = ((𝑀‘𝑋) + (𝑀‘𝑄)))
Theorem	pmapjat2 37875	The projective map of the join of an atom with a lattice element. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (pmap‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑀‘(𝑄 ∨ 𝑋)) = ((𝑀‘𝑄) + (𝑀‘𝑋)))
Theorem	pmapjlln1 37876	The projective map of the join of a lattice element and a lattice line (expressed as the join 𝑄 ∨ 𝑅 of two atoms). (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (pmap‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑀‘(𝑋 ∨ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) = ((𝑀‘𝑋) + (𝑀‘(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))))
Theorem	hlmod1i 37877	A version of the modular law pmod1i 37869 that holds in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (pmap‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ + = (+𝑃‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑍 ∧ (𝐹‘(𝑋 ∨ 𝑌)) = ((𝐹‘𝑋) + (𝐹‘𝑌))) → ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∧ 𝑍) = (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑍))))
Theorem	atmod1i1 37878	Version of modular law pmod1i 37869 that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑌) → (𝑃 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)) = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ 𝑌))
Theorem	atmod1i1m 37879	Version of modular law pmod1i 37869 that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when an element meets an atom. (Contributed by NM, 2-Sep-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) ≤ 𝑍) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑍)) = (((𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) ∨ 𝑌) ∧ 𝑍))
Theorem	atmod1i2 37880	Version of modular law pmod1i 37869 that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) → (𝑋 ∨ (𝑃 ∧ 𝑌)) = ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑌))
Theorem	llnmod1i2 37881	Version of modular law pmod1i 37869 that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is a lattice line (expressed as the join 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) → (𝑋 ∨ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑌)) = ((𝑋 ∨ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∧ 𝑌))
Theorem	atmod2i1 37882	Version of modular law pmod2iN 37870 that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑋 ∧ (𝑌 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	atmod2i2 37883	Version of modular law pmod2iN 37870 that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 14-May-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑋) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) ∨ 𝑌) = (𝑋 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑌)))
Theorem	llnmod2i2 37884	Version of modular law pmod1i 37869 that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is a lattice line (expressed as the join 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄). (Contributed by NM, 16-Sep-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑋) → ((𝑋 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∨ 𝑌) = (𝑋 ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑌)))
Theorem	atmod3i1 37885	Version of modular law that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋) → (𝑃 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)) = (𝑋 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑌)))
Theorem	atmod3i2 37886	Version of modular law that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) → (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑃)) = (𝑌 ∧ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	atmod4i1 37887	Version of modular law that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jun-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-May-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑌) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∨ 𝑃) = ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑌))
Theorem	atmod4i2 37888	Version of modular law that holds in a Hilbert lattice, when one element is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) → ((𝑃 ∧ 𝑌) ∨ 𝑋) = ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑋) ∧ 𝑌))
Theorem	llnexchb2lem 37889	Lemma for llnexchb2 37890. (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LLines‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑁) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ↔ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = (𝑋 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))))
Theorem	llnexchb2 37890	Line exchange property (compare cvlatexchb2 37356 for atoms). (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LLines‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑁) ∧ ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑍)) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ≤ 𝑍 ↔ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) = (𝑋 ∧ 𝑍)))
Theorem	llnexch2N 37891	Line exchange property (compare cvlatexch2 37358 for atoms). (Contributed by NM, 18-Nov-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LLines‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑁) ∧ ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑍)) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ≤ 𝑍 → (𝑋 ∧ 𝑍) ≤ 𝑌))
Theorem	dalawlem1 37892	Lemma for dalaw 37907. Special case of dath2 37758, where 𝐶 is replaced by ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)). The remaining lemmas will eliminate the conditions on the atoms imposed by dath2 37758. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (LPlanes‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅) ∈ 𝑂 ∧ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑈) ∈ 𝑂) ∧ ((¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃)) ∧ (¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇) ∧ ¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈) ∧ ¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆)) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈))) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))))
Theorem	dalawlem2 37893	Lemma for dalaw 37907. Utility lemma that breaks ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)) into a join of two pieces. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ ((((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑇) ∧ 𝑆) ∨ (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑇)))
Theorem	dalawlem3 37894	Lemma for dalaw 37907. First piece of dalawlem5 37896. (Contributed by NM, 4-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑇) ∨ 𝑃) ∧ 𝑆) ≤ (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))))
Theorem	dalawlem4 37895	Lemma for dalaw 37907. Second piece of dalawlem5 37896. (Contributed by NM, 4-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑇) ≤ (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))))
Theorem	dalawlem5 37896	Lemma for dalaw 37907. Special case to eliminate the requirement ¬ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) in dalawlem1 37892. (Contributed by NM, 4-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))))
Theorem	dalawlem6 37897	Lemma for dalaw 37907. First piece of dalawlem8 37899. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑇) ∧ 𝑆) ≤ (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))))
Theorem	dalawlem7 37898	Lemma for dalaw 37907. Second piece of dalawlem8 37899. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → (((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑆) ∧ 𝑇) ≤ (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))))
Theorem	dalawlem8 37899	Lemma for dalaw 37907. Special case to eliminate the requirement ¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) in dalawlem1 37892. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))))
Theorem	dalawlem9 37900	Lemma for dalaw 37907. Special case to eliminate the requirement ¬ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) in dalawlem1 37892. (Contributed by NM, 6-Oct-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑈)) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)) ≤ (((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ (𝑇 ∨ 𝑈)) ∨ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ (𝑈 ∨ 𝑆))))