P. 379 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 37801-37900   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	bj-pw0ALT 37801	Alternate proof of pw0 4776. The proofs have a similar structure: pw0 4776 uses the definitions of powerclass and singleton as class abstractions, whereas bj-pw0ALT 37801 uses characterizations of their elements. Both proofs then use transitivity of a congruence relation (equality for pw0 4776 and biconditional for bj-pw0ALT 37801) to translate the property ss0b 4354 into the wanted result. To translate a biconditional into a class equality, pw0 4776 uses abbii 2829 (which yields an equality of class abstractions), while bj-pw0ALT 37801 uses eqriv 2759 (which requires a biconditional of membership of a given setvar variable). Note that abbii 2829, through its closed form abbi 2827, is proved from eqrdv 2760, which is the deduction form of eqriv 2759. In the other direction, velpw 4565 and velsn 4603 are proved from the definitions of powerclass and singleton using elabg 3633, which is a version of abbii 2829 suited for membership characterizations. (Contributed by BJ, 14-Apr-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝒫 ∅ = {∅}
Theorem	bj-sselpwuni 37802	Quantitative version of ssexg 5288: a subset of an element of a class is an element of the powerclass of the union of that class. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝑉)
Theorem	bj-unirel 37803	Quantitative version of uniexr 7766: if the union of a class is an element of a class, then that class is an element of the double powerclass of the union of this class. (Contributed by BJ, 6-Apr-2024.)
⊢ (∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝒫 ∪ 𝑉)
Theorem	bj-elpwg 37804	If the intersection of two classes is a set, then inclusion among these classes is equivalent to membership in the powerclass. Common generalization of elpwg 4563 and elpw2g 5302 (the latter of which could be proved from it). (Contributed by BJ, 31-Dec-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-velpwALT 37805*	This theorem bj-velpwALT 37805 and the next theorem bj-elpwgALT 37806 are alternate proofs of velpw 4565 and elpwg 4563 respectively, where one proves first the setvar case and then generalizes using vtoclbg 3522 instead of proving first the general case using elab2g 3637 and then specifying. Here, this results in needing an extra DV condition, a longer combined proof and use of ax-12 2215. In other cases, that order is better (e.g., vsnex 5404 proved before snexg 5409). (Contributed by BJ, 17-Jan-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ↔ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴)
Theorem	bj-elpwgALT 37806	Alternate proof of elpwg 4563. See comment for bj-velpwALT 37805. (Contributed by BJ, 17-Jan-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-vjust 37807	Justification theorem for dfv2 3456 if it were the definition. See also vjust 3454. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ {𝑥 ∣ ⊤} = {𝑦 ∣ ⊤}
Theorem	bj-nul 37808*	Two formulations of the axiom of the empty set ax-nul 5267. Proposal: place it right before ax-nul 5267. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (∅ ∈ V ↔ ∃𝑥∀𝑦 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)
Theorem	bj-nuliota 37809*	Definition of the empty set using the definite description binder. See also bj-nuliotaALT 37810. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ∅ = (℩𝑥∀𝑦 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)
Theorem	bj-nuliotaALT 37810*	Alternate proof of bj-nuliota 37809. Note that this alternate proof uses the fact that ℩𝑥𝜑 evaluates to ∅ when there is no 𝑥 satisfying 𝜑 (iotanul 6517). This is an implementation detail of the encoding currently used in set.mm and should be avoided. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Nov-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∅ = (℩𝑥∀𝑦 ¬ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑥)
Theorem	bj-vtoclgfALT 37811	Alternate proof of vtoclgf 3532. Proof from vtoclgft 3518. (This may have been the original proof before shortening.) (Contributed by BJ, 30-Sep-2019.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝜓)
Theorem	bj-elsn12g 37812	Join of elsng 4601 and elsn2g 4628. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Nov-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∨ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-elsnb 37813	Biconditional version of elsng 4601. (Contributed by BJ, 18-Nov-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ {𝐵} ↔ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-pwcfsdom 37814	Remove hypothesis from pwcfsdom 10596. Illustration of how to remove a "proof-facilitating hypothesis". Shortens theorems using pwcfsdom 10596. (Contributed by BJ, 14-Sep-2019.)
⊢ (ℵ‘𝐴) ≺ ((ℵ‘𝐴) ↑m (cf‘(ℵ‘𝐴)))
Theorem	bj-grur1 37815	Remove hypothesis from grur1 10833. Illustration of how to remove a "definitional hypothesis". This makes its uses longer, but the theorem feels more self-contained. It looks preferable when the defined term appears only once in the conclusion. (Contributed by BJ, 14-Sep-2019.)
⊢ ((𝑈 ∈ Univ ∧ 𝑈 ∈ ∪ (𝑅1 “ On)) → 𝑈 = (𝑅1‘(𝑈 ∩ On)))
Theorem	bj-bm1.3ii 37816*	The extension of a predicate (𝜑(𝑧)) is included in a set (𝑥) if and only if it is a set (𝑦). Sufficiency is obvious, and necessity is the content of the axiom of separation ax-sep 5255. Similar to Theorem 1.3(ii) of [BellMachover] p. 463. (Contributed by NM, 21-Jun-1993.) Generalized to a closed form biconditional with existential quantifications using two different setvars 𝑥, 𝑦 (which need not be disjoint). (Revised by BJ, 8-Aug-2022.) TODO: move after sepexi 5262. Relabel ("sepbi"?).
⊢ (∃𝑥∀𝑧(𝜑 → 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ ∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ 𝜑))
Theorem	bj-dfid2ALT 37817	Alternate version of dfid2 5556. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Nov-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) Use df-id 5554 instead to make the semantics of the construction df-opab 5172 clearer. (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ I = {⟨𝑥, 𝑥⟩ ∣ ⊤}
Theorem	bj-0nelopab 37818	The empty set is never an element in an ordered-pair class abstraction. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 5-Nov-2017.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 22-Jul-2023.) TODO: move to the main section when one can reorder sections so that we can use relopab 5809 (this is a very limited reordering).
⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}
Theorem	bj-brrelex12ALT 37819	Two classes related by a binary relation are both sets. Alternate proof of brrelex12 5711. (Contributed by BJ, 14-Jul-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ((Rel 𝑅 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐵) → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
Theorem	bj-epelg 37820	The membership relation and the membership predicate agree when the "containing" class is a set. General version of epel 5562 and closed form of epeli 5561. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Mar-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2015.) TODO: move it to the main section after reordering to have brrelex1i 5715 available. (Proof shortened by BJ, 14-Jul-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 E 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-epelb 37821	Two classes are related by the membership relation if and only if they are related by the membership relation (i.e., the first is an element of the second) and the second is a set (hence so is the first). TODO: move to Main after reordering to have brrelex2i 5716 available. Check if it is shorter to prove bj-epelg 37820 first or bj-epelb 37821 first. (Contributed by BJ, 14-Jul-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 E 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
Theorem	bj-nsnid 37822	A set does not contain the singleton formed on it. More precisely, one can prove that a class contains the singleton formed on it if and only if it is proper and contains the empty set (since it is "the singleton formed on" any proper class, see snprc 4681): ⊢ ¬ ({𝐴} ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (∅ ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ V)). (Contributed by BJ, 4-Feb-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ¬ {𝐴} ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	bj-rdg0gALT 37823	Alternate proof of rdg0g 8420. More direct since it bypasses tz7.44-1 8399 and rdg0 8414 (and vtoclg 3520, vtoclga 3539). (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-1995.) More direct proof. (Revised by BJ, 17-Nov-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (rec(𝐹, 𝐴)‘∅) = 𝐴)
Theorem	bj-vn0ALT 37824	Alternate proof of vn0 4294 which does not use eqabbw 2835 (and is shorter than vn0 4294 when eqabbw 2835 is inlined). (Contributed by BJ, 12-Jul-2026.) Using the same dummy variable for 𝑦 and 𝑧 slightly reduces the proof size. (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ V ≠ ∅
21.19.5.19  Axioms of separation and replacement This section proves basic relations among some standard axioms of set theory, in particular the axiom of separation (the universal closure of ax-sep 5255) and the version of the axiom of replacement requiring the functional relation in the axiom to be a (total) function, bj-rep 37826. These axioms often appear (as specific instances) in the hypotheses of the theorems in this section.
Theorem	bj-axnul 37825*	Over the base theory ax-1 6-- ax-5 1943, the axiom of separation implies the weak emptyset axiom. By "weak emptyset axiom", we mean the axiom asserting existence of an empty set (which can be called "the" empty set when the axiom of extensionality ax-ext 2734 is posited) provided existence of a set (the True truth constant existentially quantified over a fresh variable, extru 2008). This is the conclusion of bj-axnul 37825. Note that the weak emptyset axiom implies ⊢ (∃𝑥⊤ → ∃𝑦⊤) without DV conditions hence also the same statement as the weak emptyset axiom without DV conditions on 𝑥, but only on 𝑦, 𝑧. By "axiom of separation", we mean the universal closure of ax-sep 5255, simulated here by its instance with ⊥ substituted for 𝜑 (and with the variable used to assert existence in the weak emptyset axiom substituted for the containing set) as the hypothesis of bj-axnul 37825. In particular, the axiom of existence extru 2008 and the axiom of separation together imply the emptyset axiom (and conversely, the emptyset axiom implies the axiom of existence). Note: this theorem does not require a disjointness condition on 𝑦, 𝑧, although both axioms should be stated with all variables disjoint. This proof only uses an instance of the axiom of separation with a bounded formula, so is valid in a constructive setting (see the CZF section in the "Intuitionistic Logic Explorer" iset.mm). (Contributed by BJ, 8-Mar-2026.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ∀𝑥∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ⊥))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑥⊤ → ∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ⊥)
Theorem	bj-rep 37826*	Version of the axiom of replacement requiring the functional relation in the axiom to be a (total) function from ax-rep 5236 (in the form of axrep6 5245). (Contributed by BJ, 14-Mar-2026.) The proof proves the statement without the DV condition on 𝑥, 𝜑, but the DV condition is added to this statement to show that this weaker version is sufficient. (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∀𝑥(∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∃!𝑧𝜑 → ∃𝑡∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑡 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜑))
Theorem	bj-axseprep 37827*	Axiom of separation (universal closure of ax-sep 5255) from a weak form of the axiom of replacement requiring that the functional relation in it be a (total) function and the weak emptyset axiom (existence of an empty set provided existence of a set), as written in the theorem's hypotheses. This result shows that the weak emptyset axiom is not only the result of a cheap way to avoid an axiom redundancy (in this case, the existence axiom extru 2008) by adding it as an antecedent, but also permits to prove nontrivial results that hold in nonnecessarily nonempty universes. This proof is by cases so is not intuitionistic. The statement does not require a nonempty universe; most of the proof does not either, and the parts that do (e.g., near sb8ef 2386 and sbequ12r 2289 and eueq2 3671) could be reworked to avoid it. Proof modifications should not introduce steps relying on a nonempty universe, like alrimiv 1960. (Contributed by BJ, 14-Mar-2026.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (∃𝑥⊤ → ∃𝑦∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ⊥)    &   ⊢ ∀𝑥(∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∃!𝑡𝜓 → ∃𝑦∀𝑡(𝑡 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑡 = 𝑧) ∨ (¬ 𝜑 ∧ 𝑡 = 𝑎)))    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑥∃𝑦∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝜑))
Theorem	bj-axreprepsep 37828*	Strong axiom of replacement (universal closure of ax-rep 5236) from the axioms of separation and replacement as written in the theorem's hypotheses. The statement does not require a nonempty universe; most of the proof does not either, except for the use of 19.8a 2219, which could be removed by reworking the proof, since it is applied in a subexpression bound by the variable it introduces. Proof modifications should not introduce steps relying on a nonempty universe, like alrimiv 1960. (Contributed by BJ, 14-Mar-2026.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ∀𝑥∃𝑠∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ 𝑠 ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∧ ∃𝑧𝜑))    &   ⊢ ∀𝑠(∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑠 ∃!𝑧𝜑 → ∃𝑡∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑡 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑠 𝜑))    ⇒   ⊢ ∀𝑥(∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 ∃*𝑧𝜑 → ∃𝑡∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑡 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜑))
21.19.5.20  Evaluation at a class This section treats the existing predicate Slot (df-slot 17280) as "evaluation at a class" and for the moment does not introduce new syntax for it.
Theorem	bj-evaleq 37829	Equality theorem for the Slot construction. This is currently a duplicate of sloteq 17281 but may diverge from it if/when a token Eval is introduced for evaluation in order to separate it from Slot and any of its possible modifications. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → Slot 𝐴 = Slot 𝐵)
Theorem	bj-evalfun 37830	The evaluation at a class is a function. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2021.)
⊢ Fun Slot 𝐴
Theorem	bj-evalfn 37831	The evaluation at a class is a function on the universal class. (General form of slotfn 17282). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.) (Revised by BJ, 27-Dec-2021.)
⊢ Slot 𝐴 Fn V
Theorem	bj-evalf 37832	The evaluation at a class is a function from the universal class into the universal class. (Contributed by BJ, 17-Mar-2026.)
⊢ Slot 𝐴:V⟶V
Theorem	bj-evalval 37833	Value of the evaluation at a class. Closed form of strfvnd 17283 and strfvn 17284. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.) (Revised by BJ, 27-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (Slot 𝐴‘𝐹) = (𝐹‘𝐴))
Theorem	bj-evalid 37834	The evaluation at a set of the identity function is that set. General form of ndxarg 17294. The restriction to a set 𝑉 is necessary since the argument of the function Slot 𝐴 (like that of any function) has to be a set for the evaluation to be meaningful. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (Slot 𝐴‘( I ↾ 𝑉)) = 𝐴)
Theorem	bj-ndxarg 37835	Proof of ndxarg 17294 from bj-evalid 37834. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐸 = Slot 𝑁    &   ⊢ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐸‘ndx) = 𝑁
Theorem	bj-evalidval 37836	Closed general form of strndxid 17296. Both sides are equal to (𝐹‘𝐴) by bj-evalid 37834 and bj-evalval 37833 respectively, but bj-evalidval 37836 adds something to bj-evalid 37834 and bj-evalval 37833 in that Slot 𝐴 appears on both sides. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑈) → (𝐹‘(Slot 𝐴‘( I ↾ 𝑉))) = (Slot 𝐴‘𝐹))
21.19.5.21  Elementwise operations
Syntax	celwise 37837	Syntax for elementwise operations.
class elwise
Definition	df-elwise 37838*	Define the elementwise operation associated with a given operation. For instance, + is the addition of complex numbers (axaddf 11158), so if 𝐴 and 𝐵 are sets of complex numbers, then (𝐴(elwise‘ + )𝐵) is the set of numbers of the form (𝑥 + 𝑦) with 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 and 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵. The set of odd natural numbers is (({2}(elwise‘ · )ℕ0)(elwise‘ + ){1}), or less formally 2ℕ0 + 1. (Contributed by BJ, 22-Dec-2021.)
⊢ elwise = (𝑜 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑧 ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝑥 ∃𝑣 ∈ 𝑦 𝑧 = (𝑢𝑜𝑣)}))
21.19.5.22  Elementwise intersection (families of sets induced on a subset) Many kinds of structures are given by families of subsets of a given set: Moore collections (df-mre 17676), topologies (df-top 23125), pi-systems, rings of sets, delta-rings, lambda-systems/Dynkin systems, algebras/fields of sets, sigma-algebras/sigma-fields/tribes (df-siga 34627), sigma rings, monotone classes, matroids/independent sets, bornologies, filters. There is a natural notion of structure induced on a subset. It is often given by an elementwise intersection, namely, the family of intersections of sets in the original family with the given subset. In this subsection, we define this notion and prove its main properties. Classical conditions on families of subsets include being nonempty, containing the whole set, containing the empty set, being stable under unions, intersections, subsets, supersets, (relative) complements. Therefore, we prove related properties for the elementwise intersection. We will call (𝑋 ↾t 𝐴) the elementwise intersection on the family 𝑋 by the class 𝐴. REMARK: many theorems are already in set.mm: "MM> SEARCH *rest* / JOIN".
Theorem	bj-rest00 37839	An elementwise intersection on the empty family is the empty set. TODO: this is 0rest 17520. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (∅ ↾t 𝐴) = ∅
Theorem	bj-restsn 37840	An elementwise intersection on the singleton on a set is the singleton on the intersection by that set. Generalization of bj-restsn0 37843 and bj-restsnid 37845. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊) → ({𝑌} ↾t 𝐴) = {(𝑌 ∩ 𝐴)})
Theorem	bj-restsnss 37841	Special case of bj-restsn 37840. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝑌) → ({𝑌} ↾t 𝐴) = {𝐴})
Theorem	bj-restsnss2 37842	Special case of bj-restsn 37840. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐴) → ({𝑌} ↾t 𝐴) = {𝑌})
Theorem	bj-restsn0 37843	An elementwise intersection on the singleton on the empty set is the singleton on the empty set. Special case of bj-restsn 37840 and bj-restsnss2 37842. TODO: this is restsn 23401. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ({∅} ↾t 𝐴) = {∅})
Theorem	bj-restsn10 37844	Special case of bj-restsn 37840, bj-restsnss 37841, and bj-rest10 37846. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → ({𝑋} ↾t ∅) = {∅})
Theorem	bj-restsnid 37845	The elementwise intersection on the singleton on a class by that class is the singleton on that class. Special case of bj-restsn 37840 and bj-restsnss 37841. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ({𝐴} ↾t 𝐴) = {𝐴}
Theorem	bj-rest10 37846	An elementwise intersection on a nonempty family by the empty set is the singleton on the empty set. TODO: this generalizes rest0 23400 and could replace it. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑋 ≠ ∅ → (𝑋 ↾t ∅) = {∅}))
Theorem	bj-rest10b 37847	Alternate version of bj-rest10 37846. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {∅}) → (𝑋 ↾t ∅) = {∅})
Theorem	bj-restn0 37848	An elementwise intersection on a nonempty family is nonempty. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑋 ≠ ∅ → (𝑋 ↾t 𝐴) ≠ ∅))
Theorem	bj-restn0b 37849	Alternate version of bj-restn0 37848. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ (𝑉 ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑋 ↾t 𝐴) ≠ ∅)
Theorem	bj-restpw 37850	The elementwise intersection on a powerset is the powerset of the intersection. This allows to prove for instance that the topology induced on a subset by the discrete topology is the discrete topology on that subset. See also restdis 23409 (which uses distop 23226 and restopn2 23408). (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝒫 𝑌 ↾t 𝐴) = 𝒫 (𝑌 ∩ 𝐴))
Theorem	bj-rest0 37851	An elementwise intersection on a family containing the empty set contains the empty set. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊) → (∅ ∈ 𝑋 → ∅ ∈ (𝑋 ↾t 𝐴)))
Theorem	bj-restb 37852	An elementwise intersection by a set on a family containing a superset of that set contains that set. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ (𝑋 ↾t 𝐴)))
Theorem	bj-restv 37853	An elementwise intersection by a subset on a family containing the whole set contains the whole subset. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝑋 ∧ ∪ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑋) → 𝐴 ∈ (𝑋 ↾t 𝐴))
Theorem	bj-resta 37854	An elementwise intersection by a set on a family containing that set contains that set. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝑋 ↾t 𝐴)))
Theorem	bj-restuni 37855	The union of an elementwise intersection by a set is equal to the intersection with that set of the union of the family. See also restuni 23393 and restuni2 23398. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊) → ∪ (𝑋 ↾t 𝐴) = (∪ 𝑋 ∩ 𝐴))
Theorem	bj-restuni2 37856	The union of an elementwise intersection on a family of sets by a subset is equal to that subset. See also restuni 23393 and restuni2 23398. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝑋) → ∪ (𝑋 ↾t 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	bj-restreg 37857	A reformulation of the axiom of regularity using elementwise intersection. (RK: might have to be placed later since theorems in this section are to be moved early (in the section related to the algebra of sets).) (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∅ ∈ (𝐴 ↾t 𝐴))
21.19.5.23  Moore collections (complements)
Theorem	bj-raldifsn 37858*	All elements in a set satisfy a given property if and only if all but one satisfy that property and that one also does. Typically, this can be used for characterizations that are proved using different methods for a given element and for all others, for instance zero and nonzero numbers, or the empty set and nonempty sets. (Contributed by BJ, 7-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {𝐵})𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)))
Theorem	bj-0int 37859*	If 𝐴 is a collection of subsets of 𝑋, like a Moore collection or a topology, two equivalent ways to say that arbitrary intersections of elements of 𝐴 relative to 𝑋 belong to some class 𝐵: the LHS singles out the empty intersection (the empty intersection relative to 𝑋 is 𝑋 and the intersection of a nonempty family of subsets of 𝑋 is included in 𝑋, so there is no need to intersect it with 𝑋). In typical applications, 𝐵 is 𝐴 itself. (Contributed by BJ, 7-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋 → ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 𝐴 ∖ {∅})∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(𝑋 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	bj-mooreset 37860*	A Moore collection is a set. Therefore, the class Moore of all Moore sets defined in df-bj-moore 37862 is actually the class of all Moore collections. This is also illustrated by the lack of sethood condition in bj-ismoore 37863. Note that the closed sets of a topology form a Moore collection, so a topology is a set, and this remark also applies to many other families of sets (namely, as soon as the whole set is required to be a set of the family, then the associated kind of family has no proper classes: that this condition suffices to impose sethood can be seen in this proof, which relies crucially on uniexr 7766). Note: if, in the above predicate, we substitute 𝒫 𝑋 for 𝐴, then the last ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 could be weakened to ⊆ 𝑋, and then the predicate would be obviously satisfied since ⊢ ∪ 𝒫 𝑋 = 𝑋 (unipw 5429), making 𝒫 𝑋 a Moore collection in this weaker sense, for any class 𝑋, even proper, but the addition of this single case does not add anything interesting. Instead, we have the biconditional bj-discrmoore 37869. (Contributed by BJ, 8-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Syntax	cmoore 37861	Syntax for the class of Moore collections.
class Moore
Definition	df-bj-moore 37862*	Define the class of Moore collections. This is indeed the class of all Moore collections since these all are sets, as proved in bj-mooreset 37860, and as illustrated by the lack of sethood condition in bj-ismoore 37863. This is to df-mre 17676 (defining Moore) what df-top 23125 (defining Top) is to df-topon 23142 (defining TopOn). For the sake of consistency, the function defined at df-mre 17676 should be denoted by "MooreOn". Note: df-mre 17676 singles out the empty intersection. This is not necessary. It could be written instead ⊢ Moore = (𝑥 ∈ V ↦ {𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑥 ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝒫 𝑦(𝑥 ∩ ∩ 𝑧) ∈ 𝑦}) and the equivalence of both definitions is proved by bj-0int 37859. There is no added generality in defining a "Moore predicate" for arbitrary classes, since a Moore class satisfying such a predicate is automatically a set (see bj-mooreset 37860). TODO: move to the main section. For many families of sets, one can define both the function associating to each set the set of families of that kind on it (like df-mre 17676 and df-topon 23142) or the class of all families of that kind, independent of a base set (like df-bj-moore 37862 or df-top 23125). In general, the former will be more useful and the extra generality of the latter is not necessary. Moore collections, however, are particular in that they are more ubiquitous and are used in a wide variety of applications (for many families of sets, the family of families of a given kind is often a Moore collection, for instance). Therefore, in the case of Moore families, having both definitions is useful. (Contributed by BJ, 27-Apr-2021.)
⊢ Moore = {𝑥 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝑥(∪ 𝑥 ∩ ∩ 𝑦) ∈ 𝑥}
Theorem	bj-ismoore 37863*	Characterization of Moore collections. Note that there is no sethood hypothesis on 𝐴: it is implied by either side (this is obvious for the LHS, and is the content of bj-mooreset 37860 for the RHS). (Contributed by BJ, 9-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Moore ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	bj-ismoored0 37864	Necessary condition to be a Moore collection. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Moore → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	bj-ismoored 37865	Necessary condition to be a Moore collection. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Moore)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	bj-ismoored2 37866	Necessary condition to be a Moore collection. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Moore)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∩ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	bj-ismooredr 37867*	Sufficient condition to be a Moore collection. Note that there is no sethood hypothesis on 𝐴: it is a consequence of the only hypothesis. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴) → (∪ 𝐴 ∩ ∩ 𝑥) ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Moore)
Theorem	bj-ismooredr2 37868*	Sufficient condition to be a Moore collection (variant of bj-ismooredr 37867 singling out the empty intersection). Note that there is no sethood hypothesis on 𝐴: it is a consequence of the first hypothesis. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅)) → ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Moore)
Theorem	bj-discrmoore 37869	The powerclass 𝒫 𝐴 is a Moore collection if and only if 𝐴 is a set. It is then called the discrete Moore collection. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ 𝒫 𝐴 ∈ Moore)
Theorem	bj-0nmoore 37870	The empty set is not a Moore collection. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ Moore
Theorem	bj-snmoore 37871	A singleton is a Moore collection. See bj-snmooreb 37872 for a biconditional version. (Contributed by BJ, 10-Apr-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝐴} ∈ Moore)
Theorem	bj-snmooreb 37872	A singleton is a Moore collection, biconditional version. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Dec-2021.) (Proof shortened by BJ, 10-Apr-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V ↔ {𝐴} ∈ Moore)
Theorem	bj-prmoore 37873	A pair formed of two nested sets is a Moore collection. (Note that in the statement, if 𝐵 is a proper class, we are in the case of bj-snmoore 37871). A direct consequence is ⊢ {∅, 𝐴} ∈ Moore. More generally, any nonempty well-ordered chain of sets that is a set is a Moore collection. We also have the biconditional ⊢ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉 → ({𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ Moore ↔ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴))). (Contributed by BJ, 11-Apr-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) → {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ Moore)
21.19.5.24  Maps-to notation for functions with three arguments
Theorem	bj-0nelmpt 37874	The empty set is not an element of a function (given in maps-to notation). (Contributed by BJ, 30-Dec-2020.)
⊢ ¬ ∅ ∈ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)
Theorem	bj-mptval 37875	Value of a function given in maps-to notation. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Dec-2020.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 → (((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)‘𝑋) = 𝑌 ↔ 𝑋(𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐵)𝑌)))
Theorem	bj-dfmpoa 37876*	An equivalent definition of df-mpo 7422. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) = {⟨𝑠, 𝑡⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑠 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝑡 = 𝐶)}
Theorem	bj-mpomptALT 37877*	Alternate proof of mpompt 7531. (Contributed by BJ, 30-Dec-2020.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝑧 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ↦ 𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐷)
Syntax	cmpt3 37878	Syntax for maps-to notation for functions with three arguments.
class (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐷)
Definition	df-bj-mpt3 37879*	Define maps-to notation for functions with three arguments. See df-mpt 5191 and df-mpo 7422 for functions with one and two arguments respectively. This definition is analogous to bj-dfmpoa 37876. (Contributed by BJ, 11-Apr-2020.)
⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 𝐷) = {⟨𝑠, 𝑡⟩ ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 (𝑠 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝑡 = 𝐷)}
21.19.5.25  Currying Currying and uncurrying. See also df-cur 8269 and df-unc 8270. Contrary to these, the definitions in this section are parameterized.
Syntax	csethom 37880	Syntax for the set of set morphisms.
class Set⟶
Definition	df-bj-sethom 37881*	Define the set of functions (morphisms of sets) between two sets. Same as df-map 8832 with arguments swapped. TODO: prove the same staple lemmas as for ↑m. Remark: one may define Set⟶ = (𝑥 ∈ dom Struct , 𝑦 ∈ dom Struct ↦ {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:(Base‘𝑥)⟶(Base‘𝑦)}) so that for morphisms between other structures, one could write ... = {𝑓 ∈ (𝑥 Set⟶ 𝑦) ∣ ...}. (Contributed by BJ, 11-Apr-2020.)
⊢ Set⟶ = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V ↦ {𝑓 ∣ 𝑓:𝑥⟶𝑦})
Syntax	ctophom 37882	Syntax for the set of topological morphisms.
class Top⟶
Definition	df-bj-tophom 37883*	Define the set of continuous functions (morphisms of topological spaces) between two topological spaces. Similar to df-cn 23458 (which is in terms of topologies instead of topological spaces). (Contributed by BJ, 10-Feb-2022.)
⊢ Top⟶ = (𝑥 ∈ TopSp, 𝑦 ∈ TopSp ↦ {𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘𝑥) Set⟶ (Base‘𝑦)) ∣ ∀𝑢 ∈ (TopOpen‘𝑦)(◡𝑓 “ 𝑢) ∈ (TopOpen‘𝑥)})
Syntax	cmgmhom 37884	Syntax for the set of magma morphisms.
class Mgm⟶
Definition	df-bj-mgmhom 37885*	Define the set of magma morphisms between two magmas. If domain and codomain are semigroups, monoids, or groups, then one obtains the set of morphisms of these structures. (Contributed by BJ, 10-Feb-2022.)
⊢ Mgm⟶ = (𝑥 ∈ Mgm, 𝑦 ∈ Mgm ↦ {𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘𝑥) Set⟶ (Base‘𝑦)) ∣ ∀𝑢 ∈ (Base‘𝑥)∀𝑣 ∈ (Base‘𝑥)(𝑓‘(𝑢(+g‘𝑥)𝑣)) = ((𝑓‘𝑢)(+g‘𝑦)(𝑓‘𝑣))})
Syntax	ctopmgmhom 37886	Syntax for the set of topological magma morphisms.
class TopMgm⟶
Definition	df-bj-topmgmhom 37887*	Define the set of topological magma morphisms (continuous magma morphisms) between two topological magmas. If domain and codomain are topological semigroups, monoids, or groups, then one obtains the set of morphisms of these structures. This definition is currently stated with topological monoid domain and codomain, since topological magmas are currently not defined in set.mm. (Contributed by BJ, 10-Feb-2022.)
⊢ TopMgm⟶ = (𝑥 ∈ TopMnd, 𝑦 ∈ TopMnd ↦ ((𝑥 Top⟶ 𝑦) ∩ (𝑥 Mgm⟶ 𝑦)))
Syntax	ccur- 37888	Syntax for the parameterized currying function.
class curry_
Definition	df-bj-cur 37889*	Define currying. See also df-cur 8269. (Contributed by BJ, 11-Apr-2020.)
⊢ curry_ = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∈ ((𝑥 × 𝑦) Set⟶ 𝑧) ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑥 ↦ (𝑏 ∈ 𝑦 ↦ (𝑓‘⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩)))))
Syntax	cunc- 37890	Notation for the parameterized uncurrying function.
class uncurry_
Definition	df-bj-unc 37891*	Define uncurrying. See also df-unc 8270. (Contributed by BJ, 11-Apr-2020.)
⊢ uncurry_ = (𝑥 ∈ V, 𝑦 ∈ V, 𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝑓 ∈ (𝑥 Set⟶ (𝑦 Set⟶ 𝑧)) ↦ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑥, 𝑏 ∈ 𝑦 ↦ ((𝑓‘𝑎)‘𝑏))))
21.19.5.26  Setting components of extensible structures Groundwork for changing the definition, syntax and token for component-setting in extensible structures. See https://github.com/metamath/set.mm/issues/2401
Syntax	cstrset 37892	Syntax for component-setting in extensible structures.
class [𝐵 / 𝐴]struct𝑆
Definition	df-strset 37893	Component-setting in extensible structures. Define the extensible structure [𝐵 / 𝐴]struct𝑆, which is like the extensible structure 𝑆 except that the value 𝐵 has been put in the slot 𝐴 (replacing the current value if there was already one). In such expressions, 𝐴 is generally substituted for slot mnemonics like Base or +g or dist. The V in this definition was chosen to be closer to df-sets 17262, but since extensible structures are functions on ℕ, it will be more natural to replace it with ℕ when df-strset 37893 becomes the main definition. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Feb-2022.)
⊢ [𝐵 / 𝐴]struct𝑆 = ((𝑆 ↾ (V ∖ {(𝐴‘ndx)})) ∪ {⟨(𝐴‘ndx), 𝐵⟩})
Theorem	setsstrset 37894	Relation between df-sets 17262 and df-strset 37893. Temporary theorem kept during the transition from the former to the latter. (Contributed by BJ, 13-Feb-2022.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → [𝐵 / 𝐴]struct𝑆 = (𝑆 sSet ⟨(𝐴‘ndx), 𝐵⟩))
21.19.6  Extended real and complex numbers, real and complex projective lines In this section, we indroduce several supersets of the set ℝ of real numbers and the set ℂ of complex numbers. Once they are given their usual topologies, which are locally compact, both topological spaces have a one-point compactification. They are denoted by ℝ̂ and ℂ̂ respectively, defined in df-bj-cchat 37993 and df-bj-rrhat 37995, and the point at infinity is denoted by ∞, defined in df-bj-infty 37991. Both ℝ and ℂ also have "directional compactifications", denoted respectively by ℝ̅, defined in df-bj-rrbar 37989 (already defined as ℝ*, see df-xr 11275) and ℂ̅, defined in df-bj-ccbar 37976. Since ℂ̅ does not seem to be standard, we describe it in some detail. It is obtained by adding to ℂ a "point at infinity at the end of each ray with origin at 0". Although ℂ̅ is not an important object in itself, the motivation for introducing it is to provide a common superset to both ℝ̅ and ℂ and to define algebraic operations (addition, opposite, multiplication, inverse) as widely as reasonably possible. Mathematically, ℂ̅ is the quotient of ((ℂ × ℝ≥0) ∖ {⟨0, 0⟩}) by the diagonal multiplicative action of ℝ>0 (think of the closed "northern hemisphere" in ℝ^3 identified with (ℂ × ℝ), that each open ray from 0 included in the closed northern half-space intersects exactly once). Since in set.mm, we want to have a genuine inclusion ℂ ⊆ ℂ̅, we instead define ℂ̅ as the (disjoint) union of ℂ with a circle at infinity denoted by ℂ∞. To have a genuine inclusion ℝ̅ ⊆ ℂ̅, we define +∞ and -∞ as certain points in ℂ∞. Thanks to this framework, one has the genuine inclusions ℝ ⊆ ℝ̅ and ℝ ⊆ ℝ̂ and similarly ℂ ⊆ ℂ̅ and ℂ ⊆ ℂ̂. Furthermore, one has ℝ ⊆ ℂ as well as ℝ̅ ⊆ ℂ̅ and ℝ̂ ⊆ ℂ̂. Furthermore, we define the main algebraic operations on (ℂ̅ ∪ ℂ̂), which is not very mathematical, but "overloads" the operations, so that one can use the same notation in all cases.
21.19.6.1  Complements on class abstractions of ordered pairs and binary relations
Theorem	bj-nfald 37895	Variant of nfald 2360. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	bj-nfexd 37896	Variant of nfexd 2361. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥∃𝑦𝜓)
Theorem	cgsex2gd 37897*	Implicit substitution inference for general classes. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-1995.) Adapt cgsex2g 3498 to deduction form. (Revised by BJ, 28-Mar-2026.) Do not use cgsex2g 3498. (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → 𝜓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝜒 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝜓 ∧ 𝜒) ↔ 𝜃))
Theorem	copsex2gd 37898*	Implicit substitution inference for ordered pairs. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.) Use a similar proof to copsex4g 5476 to reduce axiom usage. (Revised by SN, 1-Sep-2024.) Adapt copsex2g 5474 $p to deduction form. (Revised by BJ, 28-Mar-2026.) Do not use copsex2g 5474. (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)) → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓) ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	copsex2d 37899*	Implicit substitution deduction for ordered pairs. (Contributed by BJ, 25-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓) ↔ 𝜒))
Theorem	copsex2b 37900*	Biconditional form of copsex2d 37899. TODO: prove a relative version, that is, with ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝑉∃𝑦 ∈ 𝑊...(𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊). (Contributed by BJ, 27-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑥𝜒)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → Ⅎ𝑦𝜒)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 = 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐵)) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑥∃𝑦(⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝜓) ↔ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ∧ 𝜒)))