Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > scottexs | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Theorem scheme version of scottex 9314. The collection of all 𝑥 of minimum rank such that 𝜑(𝑥) is true, is a set. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2003.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
scottexs | ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} ∈ V |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | nfcv 2977 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} | |
2 | nfab1 2979 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥{𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} | |
3 | nfv 1915 | . . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(rank‘𝑧) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦) | |
4 | 2, 3 | nfralw 3225 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑧) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦) |
5 | nfv 1915 | . . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦) | |
6 | fveq2 6670 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (rank‘𝑧) = (rank‘𝑥)) | |
7 | 6 | sseq1d 3998 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → ((rank‘𝑧) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦) ↔ (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦))) |
8 | 7 | ralbidv 3197 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝑧 = 𝑥 → (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑧) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦))) |
9 | 1, 2, 4, 5, 8 | cbvrabw 3489 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑧) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = {𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} |
10 | df-rab 3147 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦))} | |
11 | abid 2803 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ↔ 𝜑) | |
12 | df-ral 3143 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦))) | |
13 | df-sbc 3773 | . . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑}) | |
14 | 13 | imbi1i 352 | . . . . . . 7 ⊢ (([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦))) |
15 | 14 | albii 1820 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)) ↔ ∀𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦))) |
16 | 12, 15 | bitr4i 280 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦))) |
17 | 11, 16 | anbi12i 628 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)) ↔ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))) |
18 | 17 | abbii 2886 | . . 3 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦))} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} |
19 | 9, 10, 18 | 3eqtri 2848 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑧) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} = {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} |
20 | scottex 9314 | . 2 ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} (rank‘𝑧) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)} ∈ V | |
21 | 19, 20 | eqeltrri 2910 | 1 ⊢ {𝑥 ∣ (𝜑 ∧ ∀𝑦([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 → (rank‘𝑥) ⊆ (rank‘𝑦)))} ∈ V |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 398 ∀wal 1535 ∈ wcel 2114 {cab 2799 ∀wral 3138 {crab 3142 Vcvv 3494 [wsbc 3772 ⊆ wss 3936 ‘cfv 6355 rankcrnk 9192 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1796 ax-4 1810 ax-5 1911 ax-6 1970 ax-7 2015 ax-8 2116 ax-9 2124 ax-10 2145 ax-11 2161 ax-12 2177 ax-ext 2793 ax-rep 5190 ax-sep 5203 ax-nul 5210 ax-pow 5266 ax-pr 5330 ax-un 7461 ax-reg 9056 ax-inf2 9104 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 209 df-an 399 df-or 844 df-3or 1084 df-3an 1085 df-tru 1540 df-ex 1781 df-nf 1785 df-sb 2070 df-mo 2622 df-eu 2654 df-clab 2800 df-cleq 2814 df-clel 2893 df-nfc 2963 df-ne 3017 df-ral 3143 df-rex 3144 df-reu 3145 df-rab 3147 df-v 3496 df-sbc 3773 df-csb 3884 df-dif 3939 df-un 3941 df-in 3943 df-ss 3952 df-pss 3954 df-nul 4292 df-if 4468 df-pw 4541 df-sn 4568 df-pr 4570 df-tp 4572 df-op 4574 df-uni 4839 df-int 4877 df-iun 4921 df-br 5067 df-opab 5129 df-mpt 5147 df-tr 5173 df-id 5460 df-eprel 5465 df-po 5474 df-so 5475 df-fr 5514 df-we 5516 df-xp 5561 df-rel 5562 df-cnv 5563 df-co 5564 df-dm 5565 df-rn 5566 df-res 5567 df-ima 5568 df-pred 6148 df-ord 6194 df-on 6195 df-lim 6196 df-suc 6197 df-iota 6314 df-fun 6357 df-fn 6358 df-f 6359 df-f1 6360 df-fo 6361 df-f1o 6362 df-fv 6363 df-om 7581 df-wrecs 7947 df-recs 8008 df-rdg 8046 df-r1 9193 df-rank 9194 |
This theorem is referenced by: hta 9326 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |