Theorem ax11a2 1835

Description: Derive ax-11o 1837 from a hypothesis in the form of ax-11 1520. The hypothesis is even weaker than ax-11 1520, with z both distinct from x and not occurring in ph. Thus the hypothesis provides an alternate axiom that can be used in place of ax11o 1836. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ax11a2.1	|- ( x = z -> ( A. z ph -> A. x ( x = z -> ph ) ) )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ax11a2	|- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( x = y -> ( ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) ) )

Distinct variable groups:   x, z   y, z   ph, z

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, y)

Proof of Theorem ax11a2

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax-17 1540	. . 3 |- ( ph -> A. z ph )
2		ax11a2.1	. . 3 |- ( x = z -> ( A. z ph -> A. x ( x = z -> ph ) ) )
3	1, 2	syl5 32	. 2 |- ( x = z -> ( ph -> A. x ( x = z -> ph ) ) )
4	3	ax11v2 1834	1 |- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( x = y -> ( ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) ) )

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   -> wi 4   A.wal 1362

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in2 616  ax-io 710  ax-5 1461  ax-7 1462  ax-gen 1463  ax-ie1 1507  ax-ie2 1508  ax-8 1518  ax-10 1519  ax-11 1520  ax-i12 1521  ax-4 1524  ax-17 1540  ax-i9 1544  ax-ial 1548

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-nf 1475  df-sb 1777

This theorem is referenced by:  ax11o  1836