P. 19 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 1801-1900   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	sb6x 1801	Equivalence involving substitution for a variable not free. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 12-Aug-2011.)
|- ( ph -> A. x ph )   =>    |- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) )
Theorem	nfs1f 1802	If x is not free in ph, it is not free in [ y / x ] ph. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/ x ph   =>    |- F/ x [ y / x ] ph
Theorem	hbs1f 1803	If x is not free in ph, it is not free in [ y / x ] ph. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
|- ( ph -> A. x ph )   =>    |- ( [ y / x ] ph -> A. x [ y / x ] ph )
Theorem	sbequ5 1804	Substitution does not change an identical variable specifier. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by NM, 21-Dec-2004.)
|- ( [ w / z ] A. x x = y <-> A. x x = y )
Theorem	sbequ6 1805	Substitution does not change a distinctor. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by NM, 14-May-2005.)
|- ( [ w / z ] -. A. x x = y <-> -. A. x x = y )
Theorem	sbt 1806	A substitution into a theorem remains true. (See chvar 1779 and chvarv 1964 for versions using implicit substitition.) (Contributed by NM, 21-Jan-2004.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
|- ph   =>    |- [ y / x ] ph
Theorem	equsb1 1807	Substitution applied to an atomic wff. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- [ y / x ] x = y
Theorem	equsb2 1808	Substitution applied to an atomic wff. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- [ y / x ] y = x
Theorem	sbiedh 1809	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution (deduction version of sbieh 1812). New proofs should use sbied 1810 instead. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-1994.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ph -> A. x ph )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ch -> A. x ch ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( x = y -> ( ps <-> ch ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( [ y / x ] ps <-> ch ) )
Theorem	sbied 1810	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution (deduction version of sbie 1813). (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2016.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- ( ph -> F/ x ch )   &    |- ( ph -> ( x = y -> ( ps <-> ch ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( [ y / x ] ps <-> ch ) )
Theorem	sbiedv 1811*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution (deduction version of sbie 1813). (Contributed by NM, 7-Jan-2017.)
|- ( ( ph /\ x = y ) -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( [ y / x ] ps <-> ch ) )
Theorem	sbieh 1812	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution. New proofs should use sbie 1813 instead. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-1994.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ps -> A. x ps )   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> ps )
Theorem	sbie 1813	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-1994.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2016.) (Revised by Wolf Lammen, 30-Apr-2018.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> ps )
Theorem	sbiev 1814*	Conversion of implicit substitution to explicit substitution. Version of sbie 1813 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by Wolf Lammen, 18-Jan-2023.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> ps )
Theorem	equsalv 1815*	An equivalence related to implicit substitution. Version of equsal 1749 with a disjoint variable condition. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-1993.) (Revised by BJ, 31-May-2019.)
|- F/ x ps   &    |- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x ( x = y -> ph ) <-> ps )
1.3.11  Theorems using axiom ax-11
Theorem	equs5a 1816	A property related to substitution that unlike equs5 1851 doesn't require a distinctor antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.)
|- ( E. x ( x = y /\ A. y ph ) -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) )
Theorem	equs5e 1817	A property related to substitution that unlike equs5 1851 doesn't require a distinctor antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.) (Revised by NM, 3-Feb-2015.)
|- ( E. x ( x = y /\ ph ) -> A. x ( x = y -> E. y ph ) )
Theorem	ax11e 1818	Analogue to ax-11 1528 but for existential quantification. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 31-Dec-2017.) (Proved by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2018.)
|- ( x = y -> ( E. x ( x = y /\ ph ) -> E. y ph ) )
Theorem	ax10oe 1819	Quantifier Substitution for existential quantifiers. Analogue to ax10o 1737 but for E. rather than A.. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Dec-2017.)
|- ( A. x x = y -> ( E. x ps -> E. y ps ) )
Theorem	drex1 1820	Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. Part of Theorem 9.4 of [Megill] p. 448 (p. 16 of preprint). (Contributed by NM, 27-Feb-2005.) (Revised by NM, 3-Feb-2015.)
|- ( A. x x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x x = y -> ( E. x ph <-> E. y ps ) )
Theorem	drsb1 1821	Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. Part of Theorem 9.4 of [Megill] p. 448 (p. 16 of preprint). (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( A. x x = y -> ( [ z / x ] ph <-> [ z / y ] ph ) )
Theorem	exdistrfor 1822	Distribution of existential quantifiers, with a bound-variable hypothesis saying that y is not free in ph, but x can be free in ph (and there is no distinct variable condition on x and y). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Feb-2018.)
|- ( A. x x = y \/ A. x F/ y ph )   =>    |- ( E. x E. y ( ph /\ ps ) -> E. x ( ph /\ E. y ps ) )
Theorem	sb4a 1823	A version of sb4 1854 that doesn't require a distinctor antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.)
|- ( [ y / x ] A. y ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) )
Theorem	equs45f 1824	Two ways of expressing substitution when y is not free in ph. (Contributed by NM, 25-Apr-2008.)
|- ( ph -> A. y ph )   =>    |- ( E. x ( x = y /\ ph ) <-> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) )
Theorem	sb6f 1825	Equivalence for substitution when y is not free in ph. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by NM, 30-Apr-2008.)
|- ( ph -> A. y ph )   =>    |- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) )
Theorem	sb5f 1826	Equivalence for substitution when y is not free in ph. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by NM, 18-May-2008.)
|- ( ph -> A. y ph )   =>    |- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> E. x ( x = y /\ ph ) )
Theorem	sb4e 1827	One direction of a simplified definition of substitution that unlike sb4 1854 doesn't require a distinctor antecedent. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.)
|- ( [ y / x ] ph -> A. x ( x = y -> E. y ph ) )
Theorem	hbsb2a 1828	Special case of a bound-variable hypothesis builder for substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.)
|- ( [ y / x ] A. y ph -> A. x [ y / x ] ph )
Theorem	hbsb2e 1829	Special case of a bound-variable hypothesis builder for substitution. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.)
|- ( [ y / x ] ph -> A. x [ y / x ] E. y ph )
Theorem	hbsb3 1830	If y is not free in ph, x is not free in [ y / x ] ph. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( ph -> A. y ph )   =>    |- ( [ y / x ] ph -> A. x [ y / x ] ph )
Theorem	nfs1 1831	If y is not free in ph, x is not free in [ y / x ] ph. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- F/ y ph   =>    |- F/ x [ y / x ] ph
Theorem	sbcof2 1832	Version of sbco 1995 where x is not free in ph. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Dec-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A. x ph )   =>    |- ( [ y / x ] [ x / y ] ph <-> [ y / x ] ph )
1.4  Predicate calculus with distinct variables
1.4.1  Derive the axiom of distinct variables ax-16
Theorem	spimv 1833*	A version of spim 1760 with a distinct variable requirement instead of a bound-variable hypothesis. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph -> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x ph -> ps )
Theorem	aev 1834*	A "distinctor elimination" lemma with no restrictions on variables in the consequent, proved without using ax-16 1836. (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2006.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 21-Jun-2011.)
|- ( A. x x = y -> A. z w = v )
Theorem	ax16 1835*	Theorem showing that ax-16 1836 is redundant if ax-17 1548 is included in the axiom system. The important part of the proof is provided by aev 1834. See ax16ALT 1881 for an alternate proof that does not require ax-10 1527 or ax12 1534. This theorem should not be referenced in any proof. Instead, use ax-16 1836 below so that theorems needing ax-16 1836 can be more easily identified. (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2006.)
|- ( A. x x = y -> ( ph -> A. x ph ) )
Axiom	ax-16 1836*	Axiom of Distinct Variables. The only axiom of predicate calculus requiring that variables be distinct (if we consider ax-17 1548 to be a metatheorem and not an axiom). Axiom scheme C16' in [Megill] p. 448 (p. 16 of the preprint). It apparently does not otherwise appear in the literature but is easily proved from textbook predicate calculus by cases. It is a somewhat bizarre axiom since the antecedent is always false in set theory, but nonetheless it is technically necessary as you can see from its uses. This axiom is redundant if we include ax-17 1548; see Theorem ax16 1835. This axiom is obsolete and should no longer be used. It is proved above as Theorem ax16 1835. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A. x x = y -> ( ph -> A. x ph ) )
Theorem	dveeq2 1837*	Quantifier introduction when one pair of variables is distinct. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2002.)
|- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( z = y -> A. x z = y ) )
Theorem	dveeq2or 1838*	Quantifier introduction when one pair of variables is distinct. Like dveeq2 1837 but connecting A. x x = y by a disjunction rather than negation and implication makes the theorem stronger in intuitionistic logic. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Feb-2018.)
|- ( A. x x = y \/ F/ x z = y )
Theorem	dvelimfALT2 1839*	Proof of dvelimf 2042 using dveeq2 1837 (shown as the last hypothesis) instead of ax12 1534. This shows that ax12 1534 could be replaced by dveeq2 1837 (the last hypothesis). (Contributed by Andrew Salmon, 21-Jul-2011.)
|- ( ph -> A. x ph )   &    |- ( ps -> A. z ps )   &    |- ( z = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( z = y -> A. x z = y ) )   =>    |- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( ps -> A. x ps ) )
Theorem	nd5 1840*	A lemma for proving conditionless ZFC axioms. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2002.)
|- ( -. A. y y = x -> ( z = y -> A. x z = y ) )
Theorem	exlimdv 1841*	Deduction from Theorem 19.23 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-1994.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps -> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x ps -> ch ) )
Theorem	ax11v2 1842*	Recovery of ax11o 1844 from ax11v 1849 without using ax-11 1528. The hypothesis is even weaker than ax11v 1849, with z both distinct from x and not occurring in ph. Thus the hypothesis provides an alternate axiom that can be used in place of ax11o 1844. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.)
|- ( x = z -> ( ph -> A. x ( x = z -> ph ) ) )   =>    |- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( x = y -> ( ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) ) )
Theorem	ax11a2 1843*	Derive ax-11o 1845 from a hypothesis in the form of ax-11 1528. The hypothesis is even weaker than ax-11 1528, with z both distinct from x and not occurring in ph. Thus the hypothesis provides an alternate axiom that can be used in place of ax11o 1844. (Contributed by NM, 2-Feb-2007.)
|- ( x = z -> ( A. z ph -> A. x ( x = z -> ph ) ) )   =>    |- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( x = y -> ( ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) ) )
1.4.2  Derive the obsolete axiom of variable substitution ax-11o
Theorem	ax11o 1844	Derivation of set.mm's original ax-11o 1845 from the shorter ax-11 1528 that has replaced it. An open problem is whether this theorem can be proved without relying on ax-16 1836 or ax-17 1548. Normally, ax11o 1844 should be used rather than ax-11o 1845, except by theorems specifically studying the latter's properties. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2007.)
|- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( x = y -> ( ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) ) )
Axiom	ax-11o 1845	Axiom ax-11o 1845 ("o" for "old") was the original version of ax-11 1528, before it was discovered (in Jan. 2007) that the shorter ax-11 1528 could replace it. It appears as Axiom scheme C15' in [Megill] p. 448 (p. 16 of the preprint). It is based on Lemma 16 of [Tarski] p. 70 and Axiom C8 of [Monk2] p. 105, from which it can be proved by cases. To understand this theorem more easily, think of " -. A. x x = y ->..." as informally meaning "if x and y are distinct variables, then..." The antecedent becomes false if the same variable is substituted for x and y, ensuring the theorem is sound whenever this is the case. In some later theorems, we call an antecedent of the form -. A. x x = y a "distinctor." This axiom is redundant, as shown by Theorem ax11o 1844. This axiom is obsolete and should no longer be used. It is proved above as Theorem ax11o 1844. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( x = y -> ( ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) ) )
1.4.3  More theorems related to ax-11 and substitution
Theorem	albidv 1846*	Formula-building rule for universal quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x ps <-> A. x ch ) )
Theorem	exbidv 1847*	Formula-building rule for existential quantifier (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x ps <-> E. x ch ) )
Theorem	ax11b 1848	A bidirectional version of ax-11o 1845. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-2006.)
|- ( ( -. A. x x = y /\ x = y ) -> ( ph <-> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) )
Theorem	ax11v 1849*	This is a version of ax-11o 1845 when the variables are distinct. Axiom (C8) of [Monk2] p. 105. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 15-Dec-2017.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) )
Theorem	ax11ev 1850*	Analogue to ax11v 1849 for existential quantification. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Jan-2018.)
|- ( x = y -> ( E. x ( x = y /\ ph ) -> ph ) )
Theorem	equs5 1851	Lemma used in proofs of substitution properties. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( E. x ( x = y /\ ph ) -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) )
Theorem	equs5or 1852	Lemma used in proofs of substitution properties. Like equs5 1851 but, in intuitionistic logic, replacing negation and implication with disjunction makes this a stronger result. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Feb-2018.)
|- ( A. x x = y \/ ( E. x ( x = y /\ ph ) -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) )
Theorem	sb3 1853	One direction of a simplified definition of substitution when variables are distinct. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( E. x ( x = y /\ ph ) -> [ y / x ] ph ) )
Theorem	sb4 1854	One direction of a simplified definition of substitution when variables are distinct. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( [ y / x ] ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) )
Theorem	sb4or 1855	One direction of a simplified definition of substitution when variables are distinct. Similar to sb4 1854 but stronger in intuitionistic logic. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Feb-2018.)
|- ( A. x x = y \/ A. x ( [ y / x ] ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) )
Theorem	sb4b 1856	Simplified definition of substitution when variables are distinct. (Contributed by NM, 27-May-1997.)
|- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( [ y / x ] ph <-> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) )
Theorem	sb4bor 1857	Simplified definition of substitution when variables are distinct, expressed via disjunction. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Mar-2018.)
|- ( A. x x = y \/ A. x ( [ y / x ] ph <-> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) )
Theorem	hbsb2 1858	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( [ y / x ] ph -> A. x [ y / x ] ph ) )
Theorem	nfsb2or 1859	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for substitution. Similar to hbsb2 1858 but in intuitionistic logic a disjunction is stronger than an implication. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Feb-2018.)
|- ( A. x x = y \/ F/ x [ y / x ] ph )
Theorem	sbequilem 1860	Propositional logic lemma used in the sbequi 1861 proof. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Feb-2018.)
|- ( ph \/ ( ps -> ( ch -> th ) ) )   &    |- ( ta \/ ( ps -> ( th -> et ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph \/ ( ta \/ ( ps -> ( ch -> et ) ) ) )
Theorem	sbequi 1861	An equality theorem for substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof modified by Jim Kingdon, 1-Feb-2018.)
|- ( x = y -> ( [ x / z ] ph -> [ y / z ] ph ) )
Theorem	sbequ 1862	An equality theorem for substitution. Used in proof of Theorem 9.7 in [Megill] p. 449 (p. 16 of the preprint). (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( x = y -> ( [ x / z ] ph <-> [ y / z ] ph ) )
Theorem	drsb2 1863	Formula-building lemma for use with the Distinctor Reduction Theorem. Part of Theorem 9.4 of [Megill] p. 448 (p. 16 of preprint). (Contributed by NM, 27-Feb-2005.)
|- ( A. x x = y -> ( [ x / z ] ph <-> [ y / z ] ph ) )
Theorem	spsbe 1864	A specialization theorem, mostly the same as Theorem 19.8 of [Margaris] p. 89. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 29-Dec-2017.)
|- ( [ y / x ] ph -> E. x ph )
Theorem	spsbim 1865	Specialization of implication. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 21-Jan-2018.)
|- ( A. x ( ph -> ps ) -> ( [ y / x ] ph -> [ y / x ] ps ) )
Theorem	spsbbi 1866	Specialization of biconditional. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 21-Jan-2018.)
|- ( A. x ( ph <-> ps ) -> ( [ y / x ] ph <-> [ y / x ] ps ) )
Theorem	sbbidh 1867	Deduction substituting both sides of a biconditional. New proofs should use sbbid 1868 instead. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ph -> A. x ph )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( [ y / x ] ps <-> [ y / x ] ch ) )
Theorem	sbbid 1868	Deduction substituting both sides of a biconditional. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-1993.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( [ y / x ] ps <-> [ y / x ] ch ) )
Theorem	sbequ8 1869	Elimination of equality from antecedent after substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof revised by Jim Kingdon, 20-Jan-2018.)
|- ( [ y / x ] ph <-> [ y / x ] ( x = y -> ph ) )
Theorem	sbft 1870	Substitution has no effect on a nonfree variable. (Contributed by NM, 30-May-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Wolf Lammen, 3-May-2018.)
|- ( F/ x ph -> ( [ y / x ] ph <-> ph ) )
Theorem	sbid2h 1871	An identity law for substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( ph -> A. x ph )   =>    |- ( [ y / x ] [ x / y ] ph <-> ph )
Theorem	sbid2 1872	An identity law for substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.)
|- F/ x ph   =>    |- ( [ y / x ] [ x / y ] ph <-> ph )
Theorem	sbidm 1873	An idempotent law for substitution. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jun-1994.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 21-Jan-2018.)
|- ( [ y / x ] [ y / x ] ph <-> [ y / x ] ph )
Theorem	sb5rf 1874	Reversed substitution. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2005.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
|- ( ph -> A. y ph )   =>    |- ( ph <-> E. y ( y = x /\ [ y / x ] ph ) )
Theorem	sb6rf 1875	Reversed substitution. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
|- ( ph -> A. y ph )   =>    |- ( ph <-> A. y ( y = x -> [ y / x ] ph ) )
Theorem	sb8h 1876	Substitution of variable in universal quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.) (Proof shortened by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jan-2018.)
|- ( ph -> A. y ph )   =>    |- ( A. x ph <-> A. y [ y / x ] ph )
Theorem	sb8eh 1877	Substitution of variable in existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-1993.) (Proof rewritten by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jan-2018.)
|- ( ph -> A. y ph )   =>    |- ( E. x ph <-> E. y [ y / x ] ph )
Theorem	sb8 1878	Substitution of variable in universal quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jan-2018.)
|- F/ y ph   =>    |- ( A. x ph <-> A. y [ y / x ] ph )
Theorem	sb8e 1879	Substitution of variable in existential quantifier. (Contributed by NM, 12-Aug-1993.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2016.) (Proof shortened by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jan-2018.)
|- F/ y ph   =>    |- ( E. x ph <-> E. y [ y / x ] ph )
1.4.4  Predicate calculus with distinct variables (cont.)
Theorem	ax16i 1880*	Inference with ax-16 1836 as its conclusion, that does not require ax-10 1527, ax-11 1528, or ax12 1534 for its proof. The hypotheses may be eliminable without one or more of these axioms in special cases. (Contributed by NM, 20-May-2008.)
|- ( x = z -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ( ps -> A. x ps )   =>    |- ( A. x x = y -> ( ph -> A. x ph ) )
Theorem	ax16ALT 1881*	Version of ax16 1835 that does not require ax-10 1527 or ax12 1534 for its proof. (Contributed by NM, 17-May-2008.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( A. x x = y -> ( ph -> A. x ph ) )
Theorem	spv 1882*	Specialization, using implicit substitition. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-1993.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   =>    |- ( A. x ph -> ps )
Theorem	spimev 1883*	Distinct-variable version of spime 1763. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph -> ps ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. x ps )
Theorem	speiv 1884*	Inference from existential specialization, using implicit substitition. (Contributed by NM, 19-Aug-1993.)
|- ( x = y -> ( ph <-> ps ) )   &    |- ps   =>    |- E. x ph
Theorem	equvin 1885*	A variable introduction law for equality. Lemma 15 of [Monk2] p. 109. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( x = y <-> E. z ( x = z /\ z = y ) )
Theorem	a16g 1886*	A generalization of Axiom ax-16 1836. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 25-May-2011.)
|- ( A. x x = y -> ( ph -> A. z ph ) )
Theorem	a16gb 1887*	A generalization of Axiom ax-16 1836. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( A. x x = y -> ( ph <-> A. z ph ) )
Theorem	a16nf 1888*	If there is only one element in the universe, then everything satisfies F/. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2016.)
|- ( A. x x = y -> F/ z ph )
Theorem	2albidv 1889*	Formula-building rule for 2 existential quantifiers (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 4-Mar-1997.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A. x A. y ps <-> A. x A. y ch ) )
Theorem	2exbidv 1890*	Formula-building rule for 2 existential quantifiers (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 1-May-1995.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x E. y ps <-> E. x E. y ch ) )
Theorem	3exbidv 1891*	Formula-building rule for 3 existential quantifiers (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 1-May-1995.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x E. y E. z ps <-> E. x E. y E. z ch ) )
Theorem	4exbidv 1892*	Formula-building rule for 4 existential quantifiers (deduction form). (Contributed by NM, 3-Aug-1995.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps <-> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( E. x E. y E. z E. w ps <-> E. x E. y E. z E. w ch ) )
Theorem	19.9v 1893*	Special case of Theorem 19.9 of [Margaris] p. 89. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1995.) (Revised by NM, 21-May-2007.)
|- ( E. x ph <-> ph )
Theorem	exlimdd 1894	Existential elimination rule of natural deduction. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 9-Feb-2017.)
|- F/ x ph   &    |- F/ x ch   &    |- ( ph -> E. x ps )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ps ) -> ch )   =>    |- ( ph -> ch )
Theorem	19.21v 1895*	Special case of Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. Notational convention: We sometimes suffix with "v" the label of a theorem eliminating a hypothesis such as ( ph -> A. x ph ) in 19.21 1605 via the use of distinct variable conditions combined with ax-17 1548. Conversely, we sometimes suffix with "f" the label of a theorem introducing such a hypothesis to eliminate the need for the distinct variable condition; e.g., euf 2058 derived from df-eu 2056. The "f" stands for "not free in" which is less restrictive than "does not occur in". (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( A. x ( ph -> ps ) <-> ( ph -> A. x ps ) )
Theorem	alrimiv 1896*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 5-Aug-1993.)
|- ( ph -> ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> A. x ps )
Theorem	alrimivv 1897*	Inference from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 31-Jul-1995.)
|- ( ph -> ps )   =>    |- ( ph -> A. x A. y ps )
Theorem	alrimdv 1898*	Deduction from Theorem 19.21 of [Margaris] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 10-Feb-1997.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps -> ch ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ps -> A. x ch ) )
Theorem	nfdv 1899*	Apply the definition of not-free in a context. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 11-Aug-2016.)
|- ( ph -> ( ps -> A. x ps ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> F/ x ps )
Theorem	2ax17 1900*	Quantification of two variables over a formula in which they do not occur. (Contributed by Alan Sare, 12-Apr-2011.)
|- ( ph -> A. x A. y ph )