Theorem ax11o 1815

Description: Derivation of set.mm's original ax-11o 1816 from the shorter ax-11 1499 that has replaced it.

An open problem is whether this theorem can be proved without relying on ax-16 1807 or ax-17 1519.

Normally, ax11o 1815 should be used rather than ax-11o 1816, except by theorems specifically studying the latter's properties. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2007.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ax11o	|- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( x = y -> ( ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) ) )

Proof of Theorem ax11o

Dummy variable z is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax-11 1499	. 2 |- ( x = z -> ( A. z ph -> A. x ( x = z -> ph ) ) )
2	1	ax11a2 1814	1 |- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( x = y -> ( ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) ) )

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   -> wi 4   A.wal 1346

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in2 610  ax-io 704  ax-5 1440  ax-7 1441  ax-gen 1442  ax-ie1 1486  ax-ie2 1487  ax-8 1497  ax-10 1498  ax-11 1499  ax-i12 1500  ax-4 1503  ax-17 1519  ax-i9 1523  ax-ial 1527

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1454  df-sb 1756

This theorem is referenced by:  ax11b  1819  equs5  1822