Theorem ax11o 1845

Description: Derivation of set.mm's original ax-11o 1846 from the shorter ax-11 1529 that has replaced it.

An open problem is whether this theorem can be proved without relying on ax-16 1837 or ax-17 1549.

Normally, ax11o 1845 should be used rather than ax-11o 1846, except by theorems specifically studying the latter's properties. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2007.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ax11o	|- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( x = y -> ( ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) ) )

Proof of Theorem ax11o

Dummy variable z is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ax-11 1529	. 2 |- ( x = z -> ( A. z ph -> A. x ( x = z -> ph ) ) )
2	1	ax11a2 1844	1 |- ( -. A. x x = y -> ( x = y -> ( ph -> A. x ( x = y -> ph ) ) ) )

Syntax hints:   -. wn 3   -> wi 4   A.wal 1371

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in2 616  ax-io 711  ax-5 1470  ax-7 1471  ax-gen 1472  ax-ie1 1516  ax-ie2 1517  ax-8 1527  ax-10 1528  ax-11 1529  ax-i12 1530  ax-4 1533  ax-17 1549  ax-i9 1553  ax-ial 1557

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-nf 1484  df-sb 1786

This theorem is referenced by:  ax11b  1849  equs5  1852