ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  ax11o Unicode version

Theorem ax11o 1778
Description: Derivation of set.mm's original ax-11o 1779 from the shorter ax-11 1469 that has replaced it.

An open problem is whether this theorem can be proved without relying on ax-16 1770 or ax-17 1491.

Normally, ax11o 1778 should be used rather than ax-11o 1779, except by theorems specifically studying the latter's properties. (Contributed by NM, 3-Feb-2007.)

Assertion
Ref Expression
ax11o  |-  ( -. 
A. x  x  =  y  ->  ( x  =  y  ->  ( ph  ->  A. x ( x  =  y  ->  ph )
) ) )

Proof of Theorem ax11o
Dummy variable  z is distinct from all other variables.
StepHypRef Expression
1 ax-11 1469 . 2  |-  ( x  =  z  ->  ( A. z ph  ->  A. x
( x  =  z  ->  ph ) ) )
21ax11a2 1777 1  |-  ( -. 
A. x  x  =  y  ->  ( x  =  y  ->  ( ph  ->  A. x ( x  =  y  ->  ph )
) ) )
Colors of variables: wff set class
Syntax hints:   -. wn 3    -> wi 4   A.wal 1314
This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in2 589  ax-io 683  ax-5 1408  ax-7 1409  ax-gen 1410  ax-ie1 1454  ax-ie2 1455  ax-8 1467  ax-10 1468  ax-11 1469  ax-i12 1470  ax-4 1472  ax-17 1491  ax-i9 1495  ax-ial 1499
This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-nf 1422  df-sb 1721
This theorem is referenced by:  ax11b  1782  equs5  1785
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator