Theorem bdsepnf 15534

Description: Version of ax-bdsep 15530 with one disjoint variable condition removed, the other disjoint variable condition replaced by a nonfreeness hypothesis, and without initial universal quantifier. See also bdsepnfALT 15535. Use bdsep1 15531 when sufficient. (Contributed by BJ, 5-Oct-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
bdsepnf.nf	|- F/ b ph
bdsepnf.1	|- BOUNDED ph

Assertion

Ref	Expression
bdsepnf	|- E. b A. x ( x e. b <-> ( x e. a /\ ph ) )

Distinct variable group:   a, b, x

Allowed substitution hints:   ph( x, a, b)

Proof of Theorem bdsepnf

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		bdsepnf.1	. . 3 |- BOUNDED ph
2	1	bdsepnft 15533	. 2 |- ( A. x F/ b ph -> E. b A. x ( x e. b <-> ( x e. a /\ ph ) ) )
3		bdsepnf.nf	. 2 |- F/ b ph
4	2, 3	mpg 1465	1 |- E. b A. x ( x e. b <-> ( x e. a /\ ph ) )

Syntax hints:   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105   A.wal 1362   F/wnf 1474   E.wex 1506  BOUNDED wbd 15458

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-5 1461  ax-7 1462  ax-gen 1463  ax-ie1 1507  ax-ie2 1508  ax-8 1518  ax-4 1524  ax-17 1540  ax-i9 1544  ax-ial 1548  ax-i5r 1549  ax-14 2170  ax-ext 2178  ax-bdsep 15530

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-nf 1475  df-cleq 2189  df-clel 2192

This theorem is referenced by: (None)